October 8th, 2018 3:09 PM WHAT DOES MARKETS IN EVERYTHING MEAN? (Literally Everything) Markets in everything: 1 – Association (Disassociation), 2 – Reproduction, (Families), 3 – Cooperation, (interpersonal, social), 4 – Production, (commercial), 6 – Commons, ( private and public ), 5 – Frames: Disciplines/Paradigms/Grammars (conceptual), ……(this is the hard one to get across that I’m not done with), 7 – Polities ( Institutions ), and; 8 – Warfare (Conflict and Defense ). I resort to using ‘everything’ to keep it simple. But maybe just enumerating all of them like I do everything else is better for clarity.
Theme: Cooperation
-
WHAT DOES MARKETS IN EVERYTHING MEAN? (Literally Everything) Markets in everythi
WHAT DOES MARKETS IN EVERYTHING MEAN?
(Literally Everything)
Markets in everything:
1 – Association (Disassociation),
2 – Reproduction, (Families),
3 – Cooperation, (interpersonal, social),
4 – Production, (commercial),
6 – Commons, ( private and public ),
5 – Frames: Disciplines/Paradigms/Grammars (conceptual),
……(this is the hard one to get across that I’m not done with),
7 – Polities ( Institutions ), and;
8 – Warfare (Conflict and Defense ).
I resort to using ‘everything’ to keep it simple. But maybe just enumerating all of them like I do everything else is better for clarity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 15:09:00 UTC
-
YES, GAME THEORY IS JUST A RUBK’S CUBE – A TOY – BUT…. LET’S LOOK AT THAT A MO
YES, GAME THEORY IS JUST A RUBK’S CUBE – A TOY – BUT…. LET’S LOOK AT THAT A MOMENT…
—“Curt, What are your thoughts on Game Theory? Is it a valuable tool for describing group or individual behavior or just a kind of Rubix Cube for involuntarily celibate economists.”—Vincent Cucchiara
While it is useful as a general principle that layers of prisoner’s dilemmas are always at play and therefore unpredictable, it’s a dead end since only the first, second, and at most third order are perceptible and calculable and demonstrated by man. No real world game (market) is that trivial.
Same with logics. We are all pretty good with first order logic and sometimes second order, but beyond that it’s just a language game for logicians – no one does or can think in those terms. Because no one expresses ideas that trivial.
Causal density is simply too high.
I’d make the same argument about Operationalism, in that it’s only important to understand general rules produced by operational analysis the way we understand norms and laws – we just do (use or repeat) them. The fact that it is incredibly burdensome and requires a great deal of knowledge to speak in operational language lets us make proofs when we need to the way we do with engineering, recipes, programming, and mathematics, but people will continue to speak in norms as a means of limiting the cost of neural economy (computational efficiency). We always and everywhere seek to limit physical, emotional, and intellectual costs – particularly when a norm exists that lets us communicate while avoiding them: (i.e. manners, vocabulary, narratives, traditions.)
We are always battling the problem of neural economy (computational efficiency) and this is why normative concepts are helpful – they function as useful puzzle pieces that eliminate our demand for computation of everything all the time, in real time, which is exhausting. The value of neurons is that they generalize.
Our whole problem boils down to ensuring constant relations between the real world and our generalizations of it. Unfortunately we are ignorant, we err, we bias, and we tell white, grey, and black lies to ‘maintain the peace’ as frequently as we speak in constant relations with the existential universe.
It’s bad enough we have to use prices and bank balances…. lol
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 13:56:00 UTC
-
Yes, Game Theory Is Just a Rubik’s Cube – a Toy – But…. Let’s Look at That a Moment…
October 8th, 2018 1:56 PM YES, GAME THEORY IS JUST A RUBK’S CUBE – A TOY – BUT…. LET’S LOOK AT THAT A MOMENT…
—“Curt, What are your thoughts on Game Theory? Is it a valuable tool for describing group or individual behavior or just a kind of Rubix Cube for involuntarily celibate economists.”—âVincent Cucchiaraâ
[W]hile it is useful as a general principle that layers of prisoner’s dilemmas are always at play and therefore unpredictable, it’s a dead end since only the first, second, and at most third order are perceptible and calculable and demonstrated by man. No real world game (market) is that trivial. Same with logics. We are all pretty good with first order logic and sometimes second order, but beyond that it’s just a language game for logicians – no one does or can think in those terms. Because no one expresses ideas that trivial. Causal density is simply too high. I’d make the same argument about Operationalism, in that it’s only important to understand general rules produced by operational analysis the way we understand norms and laws – we just do (use or repeat) them. The fact that it is incredibly burdensome and requires a great deal of knowledge to speak in operational language lets us make proofs when we need to the way we do with engineering, recipes, programming, and mathematics, but people will continue to speak in norms as a means of limiting the cost of neural economy (computational efficiency). We always and everywhere seek to limit physical, emotional, and intellectual costs – particularly when a norm exists that lets us communicate while avoiding them: (i.e. manners, vocabulary, narratives, traditions.) We are always battling the problem of neural economy (computational efficiency) and this is why normative concepts are helpful – they function as useful puzzle pieces that eliminate our demand for computation of everything all the time, in real time, which is exhausting. The value of neurons is that they generalize. Our whole problem boils down to ensuring constant relations between the real world and our generalizations of it. Unfortunately we are ignorant, we err, we bias, and we tell white, grey, and black lies to ‘maintain the peace’ as frequently as we speak in constant relations with the existential universe. It’s bad enough we have to use prices and bank balances…. lol Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine -
Yes, Game Theory Is Just a Rubik’s Cube – a Toy – But…. Let’s Look at That a Moment…
October 8th, 2018 1:56 PM YES, GAME THEORY IS JUST A RUBK’S CUBE – A TOY – BUT…. LET’S LOOK AT THAT A MOMENT…
—“Curt, What are your thoughts on Game Theory? Is it a valuable tool for describing group or individual behavior or just a kind of Rubix Cube for involuntarily celibate economists.”—âVincent Cucchiaraâ
[W]hile it is useful as a general principle that layers of prisoner’s dilemmas are always at play and therefore unpredictable, it’s a dead end since only the first, second, and at most third order are perceptible and calculable and demonstrated by man. No real world game (market) is that trivial. Same with logics. We are all pretty good with first order logic and sometimes second order, but beyond that it’s just a language game for logicians – no one does or can think in those terms. Because no one expresses ideas that trivial. Causal density is simply too high. I’d make the same argument about Operationalism, in that it’s only important to understand general rules produced by operational analysis the way we understand norms and laws – we just do (use or repeat) them. The fact that it is incredibly burdensome and requires a great deal of knowledge to speak in operational language lets us make proofs when we need to the way we do with engineering, recipes, programming, and mathematics, but people will continue to speak in norms as a means of limiting the cost of neural economy (computational efficiency). We always and everywhere seek to limit physical, emotional, and intellectual costs – particularly when a norm exists that lets us communicate while avoiding them: (i.e. manners, vocabulary, narratives, traditions.) We are always battling the problem of neural economy (computational efficiency) and this is why normative concepts are helpful – they function as useful puzzle pieces that eliminate our demand for computation of everything all the time, in real time, which is exhausting. The value of neurons is that they generalize. Our whole problem boils down to ensuring constant relations between the real world and our generalizations of it. Unfortunately we are ignorant, we err, we bias, and we tell white, grey, and black lies to ‘maintain the peace’ as frequently as we speak in constant relations with the existential universe. It’s bad enough we have to use prices and bank balances…. lol Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine -
As Tribes Each Loving our Histories, advancing our Nation, Tribe, Clan, Kin, and
As Tribes Each Loving our Histories, advancing our Nation, Tribe, Clan, Kin, and Family, without imposing costs upon one another, we are in harmony. As ideological monopolies attempting to… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=300432690553628&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 16:22:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047884685026766849
-
As Tribes Each Loving our Histories, advancing our Nation, Tribe, Clan, Kin, and
As Tribes Each Loving our Histories, advancing our Nation, Tribe, Clan, Kin, and Family, without imposing costs upon one another, we are in harmony. As ideological monopolies attempting to eradicate history, nation, tribe, sclan, kin, and family, we are eternal enemies. Only the monotheists attempt this evil monopoly. End the monopoly of monotheism, and end universalism, communism, islamism, semitism, abrahamism, corporatism, and the war between the races. There is only one universal law between men: non imposition. It is a negative law, not a positive one. With this one negative law, all positive choices are available that do not impose the costs of survival and domestication upon others. The problem is that the monotheisms, monopolies, all favor the interests of dysgenic reproduction, and the devolution of all capital and civilizations that fall under it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 12:22:00 UTC
-
“Politically, socially, or otherwise: as fragmentation grows linearly, the surfa
—“Politically, socially, or otherwise: as fragmentation grows linearly, the surface area across which a coherent system must retain interfaces grows exponentially. This selection pressure tends to prune nuanced interfaces, and leave those that favor binary states of info sorting.” – Matthew Pirkowski
( via Brandon Hayes )
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 21:04:00 UTC
-
Joslin on Parasitism, Immorality, Predation
by Bill Joslin Repost from October 1, 2017 · Re: parasitism, immorality, predation etc… First thing to get is that predation, parasitism and cooperation are all natural consequences of the same natural phenomena – life must seek asymmetrical benefit to survive. From there – cooperation because it multiplies agency through aligning agents, opposed to predation and parasitism which reduces net agency, provides the only strategy (application of natural phenomena) which has an unlimited time horizon. Predation ends when the prey have been consumed – the more successful the predator the more likely the prey supply is reduced to zero; the more successful the parasite the more degradation of the hosts health. Predation and parasitism cap their success – their success increases their limits to success. Cooperation, however, when success increases, limits decrease. When we extend the interpersonal strategy (cooperation) to our pool of resources (environment- including social=material, intellectual) our extraction of asymmetrical benefits increases the health of the pool of resources (stewardship) woof.
-
Joslin on Parasitism, Immorality, Predation
by Bill Joslin Repost from October 1, 2017 · Re: parasitism, immorality, predation etc… First thing to get is that predation, parasitism and cooperation are all natural consequences of the same natural phenomena – life must seek asymmetrical benefit to survive. From there – cooperation because it multiplies agency through aligning agents, opposed to predation and parasitism which reduces net agency, provides the only strategy (application of natural phenomena) which has an unlimited time horizon. Predation ends when the prey have been consumed – the more successful the predator the more likely the prey supply is reduced to zero; the more successful the parasite the more degradation of the hosts health. Predation and parasitism cap their success – their success increases their limits to success. Cooperation, however, when success increases, limits decrease. When we extend the interpersonal strategy (cooperation) to our pool of resources (environment- including social=material, intellectual) our extraction of asymmetrical benefits increases the health of the pool of resources (stewardship) woof.