(FB 1549047293 Timestamp) —“The cost of high trust must be matched by a higher cost of violating it.”—Steve Pender
Theme: Cooperation
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549771287 Timestamp) We don’t strategize and plan really. I mean, bill and I talk about personal stuff once in a while, but I mean, we all just riff off each other. So it’s not like eli or bill or john mark or anyone else asks me anything…. I don’t control anything and I don’t want to…
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549771287 Timestamp) We don’t strategize and plan really. I mean, bill and I talk about personal stuff once in a while, but I mean, we all just riff off each other. So it’s not like eli or bill or john mark or anyone else asks me anything…. I don’t control anything and I don’t want to…
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549919526 Timestamp) OUR TRIBES AND PACKS MUST WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A SHARED END: OUR SURVIVAL Look. It’s just reciprocity. Don’t swing at me and mine. It’s not complicated. I don’t swing at others unless they swing first …. or say something so stupid it’s incomprehensible to me (Peterson on “Darwinian Truth” or Taleb on “IQ”… omfg., or basically whenever (((anyone))) in the libertine movement makes and excuse for high fraud.). I stated my vision again yesterday. And I’ll state it more clearly here: Men form packs, and packs unite in tribes. They form tribes to concentrate forces behind leaders. Yet, there are only three means of coercion: 1 – force vs defense, 2 – payment vs missed payment, 3 – and inclusion vs ostracization. So we form groups of: 1 – Force (authoritarian, force), 2 – Operation (rule of law and commerce, science), and 3 – Morality (religion, moralism). These constitute the three political archetype of aggression, exchange, and boycott. We also seem to have adopted the GSRRM of the left (women’s strategy) which is undermining, and technically speaking that is an extension of boycott, moralizing, religion. And because of these three cognitive frameworks, we need leaders of each personality group, cognitive fram, leadership, and strategy. Because together we form a division of knowledge perception comprehension and labor. But here is what it will boil down to. The religious provide human shields (defense), the libertarians provide the communication, propaganda and supply, and the fascists fight. And as far as I know this is the history of how people work albeit with significant overlap. Something of this nature will evolve. The only thing that matters is that: A) we will restore some sort of authority rather than the chaos of the parasites against our people. B) we will restore a constitution and an political and bureaucratic system of policy by which our people are no longer preyed upon by. C) we will restore our religion to the status of a conditional monopoly since all religions contain morals, ethics, laws which are incompatible and lead only to middle eastern chaos and despotism. This is how it will be. Because this is how it must be. Nothing else is possible. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549919526 Timestamp) OUR TRIBES AND PACKS MUST WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A SHARED END: OUR SURVIVAL Look. It’s just reciprocity. Don’t swing at me and mine. It’s not complicated. I don’t swing at others unless they swing first …. or say something so stupid it’s incomprehensible to me (Peterson on “Darwinian Truth” or Taleb on “IQ”… omfg., or basically whenever (((anyone))) in the libertine movement makes and excuse for high fraud.). I stated my vision again yesterday. And I’ll state it more clearly here: Men form packs, and packs unite in tribes. They form tribes to concentrate forces behind leaders. Yet, there are only three means of coercion: 1 – force vs defense, 2 – payment vs missed payment, 3 – and inclusion vs ostracization. So we form groups of: 1 – Force (authoritarian, force), 2 – Operation (rule of law and commerce, science), and 3 – Morality (religion, moralism). These constitute the three political archetype of aggression, exchange, and boycott. We also seem to have adopted the GSRRM of the left (women’s strategy) which is undermining, and technically speaking that is an extension of boycott, moralizing, religion. And because of these three cognitive frameworks, we need leaders of each personality group, cognitive fram, leadership, and strategy. Because together we form a division of knowledge perception comprehension and labor. But here is what it will boil down to. The religious provide human shields (defense), the libertarians provide the communication, propaganda and supply, and the fascists fight. And as far as I know this is the history of how people work albeit with significant overlap. Something of this nature will evolve. The only thing that matters is that: A) we will restore some sort of authority rather than the chaos of the parasites against our people. B) we will restore a constitution and an political and bureaucratic system of policy by which our people are no longer preyed upon by. C) we will restore our religion to the status of a conditional monopoly since all religions contain morals, ethics, laws which are incompatible and lead only to middle eastern chaos and despotism. This is how it will be. Because this is how it must be. Nothing else is possible. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550326545 Timestamp) —“This means you recognise the value of these practices mentioned? (Preaching/prayer/feasting). What have, or what would/should the people found/find shelter in if not ch*rches?”— Benjamin Baker I recognize: 1 – The value of Teaching and Repeating in group forum to restate the terms of our contract with one another for reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. 2 – The use of Verbal Repetition (self programming) to satisfy our physical neuroticism – particularly when under stress, and 3 – The use of Celebrating together to eliminate our differences, therefore reducing social stresses of animals extremely conscious of their status in the pack (male) or herd (female) That’s because I recognize that people need mindfulness. I recognize that abrahamic religion is the worst possible means of achieving it. The fact that people ‘need or find shelter’ in a religion is evidence that it is evil. Cognitive behavioral therapy can not only prevent that need, but cure it. The church closed the stoic schools in order to make people dependent, where the stoic schools made people eindependent. The church wants addicts like drug dealers want addicts and for the same reason. Our people want MINDFULNESS so that they do not need to be SEDATED and be ADDICTS to lies or drugs, or alcohol, or sex, or whatever else they need to sedate themselves in the absence of mindfulness. My problem is coming up with a 12 step program of sorts to help addicts of semitic deceit to become fully human again. This is my interpretation of Peterson’s work: he’s half restoring stoicism through self help rather than creating the program of education such that self help is not necessary. It is no longer possible to convince educated people with experience in the world of the supernatural. We are no longer dumb and ignorant enough. I’m proposing the ‘scientific’ way of achieving the same ends.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550326545 Timestamp) —“This means you recognise the value of these practices mentioned? (Preaching/prayer/feasting). What have, or what would/should the people found/find shelter in if not ch*rches?”— Benjamin Baker I recognize: 1 – The value of Teaching and Repeating in group forum to restate the terms of our contract with one another for reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. 2 – The use of Verbal Repetition (self programming) to satisfy our physical neuroticism – particularly when under stress, and 3 – The use of Celebrating together to eliminate our differences, therefore reducing social stresses of animals extremely conscious of their status in the pack (male) or herd (female) That’s because I recognize that people need mindfulness. I recognize that abrahamic religion is the worst possible means of achieving it. The fact that people ‘need or find shelter’ in a religion is evidence that it is evil. Cognitive behavioral therapy can not only prevent that need, but cure it. The church closed the stoic schools in order to make people dependent, where the stoic schools made people eindependent. The church wants addicts like drug dealers want addicts and for the same reason. Our people want MINDFULNESS so that they do not need to be SEDATED and be ADDICTS to lies or drugs, or alcohol, or sex, or whatever else they need to sedate themselves in the absence of mindfulness. My problem is coming up with a 12 step program of sorts to help addicts of semitic deceit to become fully human again. This is my interpretation of Peterson’s work: he’s half restoring stoicism through self help rather than creating the program of education such that self help is not necessary. It is no longer possible to convince educated people with experience in the world of the supernatural. We are no longer dumb and ignorant enough. I’m proposing the ‘scientific’ way of achieving the same ends.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550407650 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION The law exists so that those with material interests (power) preserve the value of cooperation by forcing people into, and limiting them to, the market, and denying them non-market means (within the limits of cost and ability). Propertarianism explains how to use this law (logic) to suppress those forms of parasitism that are currently not, because we lacked a means of doing so. In particular (and I have only come to understand this myself over the past few years) it suppresses baiting into moral hazard, which is the general technique of exploitation that is in use. (including your sophism above). P it’s purely empirical. “people do this”, “this is why”, “self interest of those with interests”, “where almost all but the marginal cases have interests.” You can build any political order with P that you want precisely because it is an algorithmic logic (grammar), as long as you do it truthfully. To falsify P would require you falsify rational choice, reciprocity, and self interest. To state you would prefer to built some other form of government no matter how honest or dishonest, productive or parasitic, would still be explicable in P, and peoples’ behavior under it would still be universally expliable with P, because P is not a philosophy (should) but a science (is). It is the science and logic of what we call the psychological, linguistic, social sciences, and political sciences. Now you can ‘bitch’ about the fact that I use this logic to advocate for rule of law – the most parsimonious expression of that science – because you like or do not like that particular world (because it would crush ‘creativity in dishonesty’) which means ‘witty people’ have no more utility in their manipulation of others in order to obtain self image, social status, and various forms of influence. But that is the point altogether. P is simply ‘true’. What you do it it is a matter of your (power-group’s) preferences. I prefer to crush the abrahamic deceits (baiting into moral hazard by sophisms, pseudosciences, supernaturalisms, and deceits) and to use this to save my people from their lies. Maybe you prefer otherwise. But I am fairly sure that the mainstream will prefer my argument and policy recommendations over the alternatives and this lowers their resistance to its implementation relative to your alternatives. Again. Please don’t try to be smarter. You aren’t in the first place (even close) and P is quite a superpower – just like reason, empiricism, and science were superpowers before it. The more I use P, the better I get at it, the more I understand the revolution in human thought and experience that would be brought about is as great as the previous revolutions provided by western thought (reason, empiricism, science).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550407650 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION The law exists so that those with material interests (power) preserve the value of cooperation by forcing people into, and limiting them to, the market, and denying them non-market means (within the limits of cost and ability). Propertarianism explains how to use this law (logic) to suppress those forms of parasitism that are currently not, because we lacked a means of doing so. In particular (and I have only come to understand this myself over the past few years) it suppresses baiting into moral hazard, which is the general technique of exploitation that is in use. (including your sophism above). P it’s purely empirical. “people do this”, “this is why”, “self interest of those with interests”, “where almost all but the marginal cases have interests.” You can build any political order with P that you want precisely because it is an algorithmic logic (grammar), as long as you do it truthfully. To falsify P would require you falsify rational choice, reciprocity, and self interest. To state you would prefer to built some other form of government no matter how honest or dishonest, productive or parasitic, would still be explicable in P, and peoples’ behavior under it would still be universally expliable with P, because P is not a philosophy (should) but a science (is). It is the science and logic of what we call the psychological, linguistic, social sciences, and political sciences. Now you can ‘bitch’ about the fact that I use this logic to advocate for rule of law – the most parsimonious expression of that science – because you like or do not like that particular world (because it would crush ‘creativity in dishonesty’) which means ‘witty people’ have no more utility in their manipulation of others in order to obtain self image, social status, and various forms of influence. But that is the point altogether. P is simply ‘true’. What you do it it is a matter of your (power-group’s) preferences. I prefer to crush the abrahamic deceits (baiting into moral hazard by sophisms, pseudosciences, supernaturalisms, and deceits) and to use this to save my people from their lies. Maybe you prefer otherwise. But I am fairly sure that the mainstream will prefer my argument and policy recommendations over the alternatives and this lowers their resistance to its implementation relative to your alternatives. Again. Please don’t try to be smarter. You aren’t in the first place (even close) and P is quite a superpower – just like reason, empiricism, and science were superpowers before it. The more I use P, the better I get at it, the more I understand the revolution in human thought and experience that would be brought about is as great as the previous revolutions provided by western thought (reason, empiricism, science).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550537786 Timestamp) Loving y’all tonight. Even the pissed-off Christians. We all fight for the good by the means we understand and are available to us. If you’ll fight for our people that’s fine. that’s all that’s necessary. We all need to fight the good fight.