RT @curtdoolittle: It’s because I”m not trying to reconcile or compromise, but revolt and separate so we cooperate by market rather than su…
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-26 20:59:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1121881524721344512
Cooperation is only valuable until it is not.
It’s not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-23 18:06:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1120750891647127552
It’s not tiny at the margins, but then women have dominated the middle of society (the easy jobs) because you’re correct in that verbal superiority and cooperative flexibility are more valuable in the middle of the curve, and aggression(at the bottom) and superiority(top) matter.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-20 18:13:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1119665388294475776
Reply addressees: @WildHoodLawyer @EPoe187 @0ldG0ds128 @jrwill9
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118856173409775617
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118856173409775617
All any of us care about, is if we call you up you show up. If you show up we win. It won’t be easy. We will all pay a price. But we will win.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 19:38:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1116062853511905281
There is only one natural law of cooperation: Productive, Fully Informed, Voluntary, Exchange – free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated investments of others. That’s it. This free trade is just another example of Ghetto Ethics in Natural Law guise.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-09 21:15:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115724910926663681
Reply addressees: @mikerosenwald @tylercowen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115640295134257152
IN REPLY TO:
@mikerosenwald
My friend @tylercowen new book is out today. It is an all-in defense of American capitalism. Even if you disagree with him, you should read it because a) intellectual bubbles suck and b) to see an extraordinary mind at work. https://t.co/7IgvkfbLX6
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115640295134257152
Once they have turned your women against you, then you must treat your women as the enemy as well. You are no longer working on their behalf any more than they are working on your behalf. They turned our women against us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-09 17:16:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115664808903229441
—“Morality binds people into groups. It gives us tribalism, it gives us genocide, war, and politics. But it also gives us heroism, altruism, and sainthood.”—Jonathan Haidt
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-03 01:14:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1113248484076007424
(FB 1541973192 Timestamp) THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING THE INVITE So why is it that you have all made such amazing progress together? I mean. All of you have made dramatic progress. and while I think some of it is feedback from synchronicity with current events, the reality is that for some reason a lot of people are reaching ‘sufficient mastery’ at the same time. We want, (I want), to know, for the purpose of future education of others, what you have (bill has) done in Sheepdog that works so effectively. In contrast, absolutists tend to learn the fastest but then they defect into wordplay instead of action. I feel like I am attracting and filtering people who then aggregate into like-groups and work together. I want to understand how we can create a spectrum of these ‘groups’ whether intentionally or by slowly fostering the right people. And I want to (a) run classes on the one hand and (b) organize and plan for ‘action’ on the other. Thanks for any help you can provide.
(FB 1541973192 Timestamp) THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING THE INVITE So why is it that you have all made such amazing progress together? I mean. All of you have made dramatic progress. and while I think some of it is feedback from synchronicity with current events, the reality is that for some reason a lot of people are reaching ‘sufficient mastery’ at the same time. We want, (I want), to know, for the purpose of future education of others, what you have (bill has) done in Sheepdog that works so effectively. In contrast, absolutists tend to learn the fastest but then they defect into wordplay instead of action. I feel like I am attracting and filtering people who then aggregate into like-groups and work together. I want to understand how we can create a spectrum of these ‘groups’ whether intentionally or by slowly fostering the right people. And I want to (a) run classes on the one hand and (b) organize and plan for ‘action’ on the other. Thanks for any help you can provide.
(FB 1542035680 Timestamp) LOVE by Nick’s Reason Love is not something that needs to be ‘found’ or ‘felt’ in any great intuitive way. Love is a skill that requires discipline. I can love anyone. In a sexual relationship, all that is required is a sexual attraction and the rest of the love thing is the application and discipline of the skill, love. Now, taking it the next step further, to love someone for a lifetime will require other calculations to be made which are again not something that needs to be ‘found’ or ‘felt’ but simply measured, understood and reciprocal. These include character, values & goals. With the ingredients of sexual attraction, the application of the loving skill and the measured reciprocation of character, values, and goals you have the recipe of a lifelong relationship. The love of a sexual relationship by this definition isnât any different to how one would love all their other kin (minus the sexuality) —âI Love Youâ means âI promise that if you test the hypothesis that my happiness depends on your own, against my actions, you will not find it untrueâ— Eli Harman