Which is frustrating because if you would help us get rid of our problem instead of fighting us we would have a future together against much greater numbers.
But as usual, you use the jewish method of undermining – because you can’t grasp how stupid (naive) western people are.
@galt_the @JohnNune1 So while I comprehend that we are naive, and we are going through our “200 years together” that you already have, and going through the same cycle of jewish deception, the difference is that we have the ability to restore truthful speech and high trust
@galt_the @JohnNune1 So while I comprehend that we are naive, and we are going through our “200 years together” that you already have, and going through the same cycle of jewish deception, the difference is that we have the ability to restore truthful speech and high trust
There is more value in as many similar but different ‘tribal’ leaders who support one another than in cooperation, because men are particular (picky) in their tribal alliances and seek those least different from them. Group value is in when all tribes must act – together.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Don’t counter signal on my time. There are enough of us to get it done. Those who won’t are just gutless free riders who need real men to follow. So it’s up to real men to get the job done.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Explanation: Defection. The differences in behavior between male loyalty vs female devotion reflect reproductive interests. This is not covered in the literature but explains gender distributions all walks of life more so than minor iq diffs of outliers. Econ in everything.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81041691_173436870721141_8715498446229864448_o_173436867387808.jpg EXPANDING THE BULLET LIST: WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?
LETS USE MINIMUM DETAIL
“Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”
That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very.
Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?
This scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.
We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.
We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.
We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.
That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.
One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally – which is a problem for the left.
The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.
That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.
Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.
See?
LETS ADD A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method.
Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements.
By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech.
We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench).
Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons.
And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of.
In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes
WHAT IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT? (A GRAMMAR)
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism?
What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism?
What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions?
Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols?
So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)?
Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational.
What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations).
It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.EXPANDING THE BULLET LIST: WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?
LETS USE MINIMUM DETAIL
“Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”
That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very.
Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?
This scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.
We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.
We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.
We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.
That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.
One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally – which is a problem for the left.
The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.
That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.
Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.
See?
LETS ADD A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method.
Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements.
By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech.
We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench).
Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons.
And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of.
In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes
WHAT IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT? (A GRAMMAR)
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism?
What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism?
What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions?
Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols?
So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)?
Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational.
What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations).
It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.
The brain is a simple organ – there is just a lot of it. We evolved to acquire. That’s why we have expensive brains, why we can cooperate, why we can speak: to help us acquire.When imagining a future condition (fantasizing) we (bias) stimulate reward and novelty but ignore costs. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1207509665715765248
Status (reputation) is a survival asset (capital-in-toto), because it controls access to, and cost of, opportunity for cooperation, providing discounts/premiums. We evolved hypersensitivity to status(reputation), and it’s our *most* dominant system of self and other measurement. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1207613233558888448
There is an organization that exploded across the world based on the same two things being applied to the learning of P, creating opportunity to fail and playing king of the hill to accelerate development. The guy who built this organization is Greg Glassman, Founder of CrossFit Inc.
Track down some of the early videos/material, not the Competition/Games related stuff, and you find some pretty solid and productive applications of king of the hill. Make it measurable, then put points on each measurement and say “Go”. Winning points go up on the board.
(if you listen to the war college lecture and replace the concept “fitness” with “reciprocity” you will start to see similarities in what P is doing with creating methods of measurement, falsification and due diligence – part 4 of the War College lecture goes a bit about the impact of turning development into competition)
Not really. (a)Can you testify to your claims and can the other person testify to theirs? (b)Is your claim or the other person’s reciprocal? (c)Nearly all claims of common good are false, and consist only of excuses by which to use some means of coercion, to seek rents (gains).
(I’m about finished with the propertarian project although there are always nuances to work with, but this is worth repeating.)
KING OF THE HILL GAMES
I teach by creating games that men will compete in. This is how men are best taught. Instead of asking questions I start arguments. Instead of preaching an angle, I attack a proposition and force others to defend it. Instead of assuming equality I play king of the hill and bait them into attacking me. Instead of writing essays of appeal I write arguments to criticize.
BAIT MEN INTO DOMINANCE PLAY.
Teaching men is really easy: Bait them into dominance play.
Just as exhaustive forgiveness in tit-for-tat is the optimum cooperative strategy, exhaustive baiting for dominance play is the optimum MALE cooperative strategy.
Set up King of the Hill games where ANY forward progress gets the men recognition. Do not criticize failure, only cowardice, attention seeking, or time wasting.
If you are too predictable you will ruin the game. You must present a variety of challenges.
We cannot feel ‘good’ about learning by conformity the way girls and women do. We must play at fighting or it’s not worth our time.
AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM: KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN
I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. Iâ��ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early.
Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it�s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument.
I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them.
My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me“. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development).
That is why this game works.
Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating.
The internet does change. Men don�t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases.
The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience.
I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.)
You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview � because I�m not very much like my online persona.
This is educational entertainment and theatre.
I DON’T DO HATE
I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy.
But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty.
I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence.
I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement.
I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement.
I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.
