Theme: Cooperation

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/87045742_212213076843520_31793515466

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/87045742_212213076843520_31793515466

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/87045742_212213076843520_3179351546613727232_n_212213073510187.jpg ON FARMERS IN THE DIVISION OF LABOR

    (The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson)

    Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.)

    Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized, and distribution.

    A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools).

    But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers.

    This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices.

    As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).

    —-

    (See attached net income for farms)ON FARMERS IN THE DIVISION OF LABOR

    (The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson)

    Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.)

    Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized, and distribution.

    A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools).

    But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers.

    This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices.

    As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).

    —-

    (See attached net income for farms)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 08:41:00 UTC

  • RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITY Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary

    RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITY

    Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability.

    Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.

    MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM

    … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake)

    … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain

    … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain

    … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain

    Amoral – no affect on others at gain.

    … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain

    … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain

    … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain

    … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake)

    The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 09:39:00 UTC

  • he is saying that we don’t understand each other, but (supposedly) we need eacho

    he is saying that we don’t understand each other, but (supposedly) we need eachother.

    i have a very different understanding: eugenic vs dysgenic


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 03:42:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229974425971437569

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229967996883472384

  • The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form

    (getting close to most reductive and complete form)SOVEREIGNTY REQUIRES RECIPROCITYReciprocity in Nature:  ( …cooperation and consciousness … ) Reciprocity in Deed(Actions): Due Diligence in tests of productive, fully informed[6], voluntary transfer[7] of demonstrated interests[2] within the limits of proportionality[4], free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality[8]; and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability[5]. Reciprocity in Word(Speech): Due Diligence in categorical and internal consistency within the limits of human faculties; operationally possible within the limits of human abilities, empirically correspondent within the limits of realism, naturalism and operationalism, rational within the limits of bounded rationality[1], reciprocal in rational choice, and fully accounted within stated limits. If you cannot pass those tests you cannot claim to engage in reciprocity in display, word, or deed. If you cannot engage in reciprocity you are either ignorant or ir-reciprocal. Even if you are ignorant, once informed, and continue you are ir-reciprocal. DECIDABILITY We may boycott(separate) if not a threat, cooperate(cohabitate) if we can, or prey(war) upon one another if we must. Since all irreciprocity constitutes free riding, parasitism, or predation, the only reason to let another individual or group exist, is reciprocity – all others are not only enemies, but devolutionary, and prohibiting the transcendence of man into the gods we imagined. This is the Natural Law. EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY: An Entrepreneurial Militia, Using Technology, Adaptability, Maneuver, and Speed Under Contractual Warfare, Oath, Duty, Loyalty Status in exchange for Heroism, Wealth, Excellence, Beauty With Differences adjudicated by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Under Natural Law of Reciprocity, Jury, Thang or Senate, King as judge of last resort. Leaving only survival in markets for everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polity, defense, and war. Causing suppression of the reproduction of the less able, and the devotion of the savings in surplus to the production of commons, and the disproportionate returns on the commons. And devoting high investment to the raising of our offspring to produce and defend the commons. (…) Transcendence of man into gods the gods we imagined. THE LAW OF OPTIMUM POLITIES A Power distribution of the Natural law(Suppression of Parasitism); A Pareto Distribution of Assets (organize voluntary production); A Nash Distribution of Rewards (Market Income); An Egalitarian Distribution of Commons (Earnings); At the cost of A Suppression of Reproduction of the Demonstrated Underclasses (Eugenics); Equal Distribution of Defense of all of the above. And Zero Tolerance for Violation of any of the above (Intolerance). EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the west’s unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from a animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. OPTIMUM HUMAN ORDER There is no more coherent or successful nor possibly superior means for humans to evolve into the gods we imagine, with each generation living in the optimum conditions while doing so. ENFORCEMENT “So perhaps you don’t understand. This isn’t a negotiation. This isn’t a compromise. These are demands. We will restore our sovereignty, and leave you in peace, or we will conquer, enslave, or kill you – and all like you – until your consent is no longer required.” === Definitions:

    1. Bounded Rationality: man is not omniscient, omnipotent, or free or error, and seeks practical action in satisfaction of wants within his limits rather than optimums.

    2. Demonstrated Interest: man demonstrates continuous consumption, acquisition, preservation. Anything man demonstrates an interest in consuming, acquiring, preserving, whether by action or refraining from action, constitutes a demonstrated interest. In P law we categories demonstrated interest as Property-in-toto when referring to individuals or Capital-in-toto when referring to commons and we enumerate all categories of both under the definition of property-in-toto.

    3. Operational, Operationalism: possible to perform and speak of performing, a sequence of subjectively testable human actions. where subjectively testable means by imitating (physical), sympathizing (thinking), empathizing (feeling).

    4. Limits of Proportionality: incentive to defect given predictable future given accumulated results of reciprocal display word and deed. (Defense against systemic undermining).

    5. Restitutability: the possibility of restitution, and sufficient resources to perform restitution.

    6. Fully Informed: Reciprocal in Speech (testimony).

    7. Voluntary Transfer: loss, consumption, transfer of possession, right, or title

    8. Negative Externality: involuntary transfer against the demonstrated intersets of those not involved in the action or exchange.

  • The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form

    (getting close to most reductive and complete form)SOVEREIGNTY REQUIRES RECIPROCITYReciprocity in Nature:  ( …cooperation and consciousness … ) Reciprocity in Deed(Actions): Due Diligence in tests of productive, fully informed[6], voluntary transfer[7] of demonstrated interests[2] within the limits of proportionality[4], free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality[8]; and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability[5]. Reciprocity in Word(Speech): Due Diligence in categorical and internal consistency within the limits of human faculties; operationally possible within the limits of human abilities, empirically correspondent within the limits of realism, naturalism and operationalism, rational within the limits of bounded rationality[1], reciprocal in rational choice, and fully accounted within stated limits. If you cannot pass those tests you cannot claim to engage in reciprocity in display, word, or deed. If you cannot engage in reciprocity you are either ignorant or ir-reciprocal. Even if you are ignorant, once informed, and continue you are ir-reciprocal. DECIDABILITY We may boycott(separate) if not a threat, cooperate(cohabitate) if we can, or prey(war) upon one another if we must. Since all irreciprocity constitutes free riding, parasitism, or predation, the only reason to let another individual or group exist, is reciprocity – all others are not only enemies, but devolutionary, and prohibiting the transcendence of man into the gods we imagined. This is the Natural Law. EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY: An Entrepreneurial Militia, Using Technology, Adaptability, Maneuver, and Speed Under Contractual Warfare, Oath, Duty, Loyalty Status in exchange for Heroism, Wealth, Excellence, Beauty With Differences adjudicated by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Under Natural Law of Reciprocity, Jury, Thang or Senate, King as judge of last resort. Leaving only survival in markets for everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polity, defense, and war. Causing suppression of the reproduction of the less able, and the devotion of the savings in surplus to the production of commons, and the disproportionate returns on the commons. And devoting high investment to the raising of our offspring to produce and defend the commons. (…) Transcendence of man into gods the gods we imagined. THE LAW OF OPTIMUM POLITIES A Power distribution of the Natural law(Suppression of Parasitism); A Pareto Distribution of Assets (organize voluntary production); A Nash Distribution of Rewards (Market Income); An Egalitarian Distribution of Commons (Earnings); At the cost of A Suppression of Reproduction of the Demonstrated Underclasses (Eugenics); Equal Distribution of Defense of all of the above. And Zero Tolerance for Violation of any of the above (Intolerance). EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the west’s unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from a animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. OPTIMUM HUMAN ORDER There is no more coherent or successful nor possibly superior means for humans to evolve into the gods we imagine, with each generation living in the optimum conditions while doing so. ENFORCEMENT “So perhaps you don’t understand. This isn’t a negotiation. This isn’t a compromise. These are demands. We will restore our sovereignty, and leave you in peace, or we will conquer, enslave, or kill you – and all like you – until your consent is no longer required.” === Definitions:

    1. Bounded Rationality: man is not omniscient, omnipotent, or free or error, and seeks practical action in satisfaction of wants within his limits rather than optimums.

    2. Demonstrated Interest: man demonstrates continuous consumption, acquisition, preservation. Anything man demonstrates an interest in consuming, acquiring, preserving, whether by action or refraining from action, constitutes a demonstrated interest. In P law we categories demonstrated interest as Property-in-toto when referring to individuals or Capital-in-toto when referring to commons and we enumerate all categories of both under the definition of property-in-toto.

    3. Operational, Operationalism: possible to perform and speak of performing, a sequence of subjectively testable human actions. where subjectively testable means by imitating (physical), sympathizing (thinking), empathizing (feeling).

    4. Limits of Proportionality: incentive to defect given predictable future given accumulated results of reciprocal display word and deed. (Defense against systemic undermining).

    5. Restitutability: the possibility of restitution, and sufficient resources to perform restitution.

    6. Fully Informed: Reciprocal in Speech (testimony).

    7. Voluntary Transfer: loss, consumption, transfer of possession, right, or title

    8. Negative Externality: involuntary transfer against the demonstrated intersets of those not involved in the action or exchange.

  • The biggest impact all of us seem to have is (a) share posts and tweets, (b) to

    The biggest impact all of us seem to have is (a) share posts and tweets, (b) to make short video about our solutions not methodology (c) to make short videos how some one of our policies solves a problem for both right and left, and (d) we need to spend this year starting a political party.

    We need to appeal to both sides as finding a peaceful resolution.

    The purpose of civil war position is to remind both sides that the unthinkable is thinkable, and possible – that’s why we need to take positive action to resolve differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 11:03:00 UTC

  • 1) Whiteness = Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism(Science), Recipro

    1) Whiteness = Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism(Science), Reciprocity and Truth Regardless of Cost(Natural Law), Voluntary Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities(Meritocracy), and suppression of underclass reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 17:22:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228731220344918018

    Reply addressees: @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182788963989426178

  • Categories of Religion

    Categories of Religion

    Feb 13, 2020, 11:55 AM By: Luke Weinhagen, via Brandon Hayes (Core) (expanded) (added “Internecitic Religion”) [E]xamining the effects of belief systems from the frame of symbiosis – Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner Neutralitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and no cost to the non-practitioner Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Internecitic Religion – harm to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner’

    85130731_10218928802823757_6094154075824193536_o.jpg
    85046746_206469310751230_4465482015956795392_o.jpg
  • Categories of Religion

    Categories of Religion

    Feb 13, 2020, 11:55 AM By: Luke Weinhagen, via Brandon Hayes (Core) (expanded) (added “Internecitic Religion”) [E]xamining the effects of belief systems from the frame of symbiosis – Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner Neutralitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and no cost to the non-practitioner Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Internecitic Religion – harm to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner’

    85130731_10218928802823757_6094154075824193536_o.jpg
    85046746_206469310751230_4465482015956795392_o.jpg
  • Why do I care? No more woo woo in cognitive science please. If you can’t pass th

    Why do I care? No more woo woo in cognitive science please. If you can’t pass the mirror test, the gesture test, sympathy test (cooperation), demonstrate natural operational grammar (language), and create multi-part tools, or enter into agreement (consent) then you’re far behind.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 19:41:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227679190314573825

    Reply addressees: @robinhanson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227678491539365890


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @robinhanson To equate sentience (feeling of changes in state), and awareness (of change instate of environment) and semi-consiousness (prediction of future states and possible reactions), consciousness (prediction of future permutations of state), to transformations of state is a leap.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227678491539365890