COMPARE GROUP STRATEGIES: GREEK ARISTOCRATIC EPIC CYCLE VS JEWISH UNDERCLASS TESTAMENTS AND BIBLE
Let’s see if I can help y’all understand the group competitive strategy in the Tanakh compared to the group strategy of the Epic cycle of the greeks.
Analyzing the group competitive… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1788663954794803307
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-09 20:36:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788669504643379665
So, Again, Are Ethnocentrism and Ethnonationalism a Property of Natural Law?
I had to think about this one a bit more. Because The Natural Law of Cooperation is a first principle, and I have tried to limit the scope of natural law just that first NECESSARY principle from which… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1787509995241664780
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-07 06:16:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787728300418150761
Well done.
(And yes this type of clarity is why I’m a little adamant that you stick around and ‘serve the common good’ despite that social media is flooded with vocal overconfident wishful thinking dark triads, the vapidly ignorant, and mouth breathers. 😉 )
Hugs
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-07 04:23:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787699761790791968
Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787699167579541675
And a high school audience.
“Title: Individual Success Comes from Working Together as a Society, Made Possible by Heroes Working for the Common Good
The author is making a few key points:
While focusing on individual success is practical and leads to the best results for individuals, the economy, and politics, no one succeeds completely alone. All human achievements depend on being part of a society that provides resources and has rules.
The author disagrees with Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” (rules for how robots should behave). The author thinks these rules only work if society creates the right conditions for them.
How far into the future people think (called “time preference”) when making decisions depends on how well society provides shared resources. This affects things like preserving genetic traits, physical appearance, civilization, and culture over time.
Although it might seem like this view goes against wanting a country for a specific ethnic group (an “ethnostate”), the author argues that it actually supports this idea. Having the power to get people to be patient and think long-term leads to the best shared resources for the past, present, and future.
For the author, “Whiteness” means individuals being responsible for things that benefit both themselves and society. It means respecting ancestors, investing in shared resources now, and passing on resources to future generations. This allows continuous improvement through a culture of pursuing truth, excellence, beauty, cooperation, and heroically overcoming challenges.
The author believes understanding these points provides a scientific and inspiring worldview. It can be the basis for laws and a natural religion to preserve European people, their connection to their ancestors, and nature.”
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:46:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787584756294512642
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787578815318729162
Now for a postgrad audience:
“Title: Individual-ism is a Product of Commons-ism, Which is a Product of Hero-ism for the Common Good
The author posits that while the pursuit of individual maximization of potential is pragmatic and optimal in various domains (individual, economic, and political), it is inherently contingent upon the individual’s participation in and regulation by the commons produced by a polity.
The author critiques Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics as a sophistic metaphysical presumption, arguing that their viability is predicated on the existence of a polity that generates and necessitates them as a commons.
Furthermore, the author asserts that the time preference of an individual’s decision-making criteria, exemplified by the choice of the limit of genetic persistence of group genome, morphology, phenotype, civilization, and culture, is also a product of the polity’s capacity to produce commons sufficient to extend both individual and group time preferences to that limit.
While this may appear to contradict the ambitions of preserving an ethnostate, the author argues that it actually vindicates it. The pursuit of power to institutionalize the delay of gratification by extending time preference in the production of the optimum discovered and known commons for past, present, and future is justified.
The author defines “Whiteness” as the institutional demand for individual responsibility across the spectrum of private to common for shared producers of that commons, and responsibility for the past debt to ancestors, present cost of commons for one another, and transfer of that inheritance and cost as an investment for future generations. This produces continuous evolution in duty to truth, excellence, beauty, and the institution of discounts on complex cooperation, stress, uncertainty, and a mindfulness and culture of heroism in their production.
The author concludes by asserting that understanding these concepts provides a scientific, profound, and inspirational foundation for a natural religion of European people, their ancestors, and nature, as well as the criteria for the foundations of law to ensure the persistence of their people.”
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:44:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787584151589097472
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787578815318729162
“Here’s a translation of the article that a first-year college student should be able to understand:
Title: Individual success comes from working together as a society, which is made possible by people being heroes for the common good
The author is making a few main points:
While focusing on individual success is practical and leads to the best outcomes for individuals, the economy, and politics, no one succeeds entirely on their own. All human achievements depend on being part of a society that provides resources and has rules.
The author qualifies Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” (rules for how robots should behave). The author thinks these rules only work if society creates the conditions for them.
How long-term people think (called “time preference”) when making decisions depends on how well society provides shared resources. This affects things like preserving genetic traits, physical traits, civilization, and culture over time.
Although it may seem like this view goes against wanting an ethnostate (a state or country for a particular ethnic group), the author argues the opposite is true. Having the power to get people to be patient and think long-term leads to the best shared resources for the past, present and future.
For the author, “Whiteness” means individuals being responsible for things that benefit themselves and society as a whole. It means paying debts to ancestors, investing in shared resources in the present, and passing on resources to future generations. This allows continuous improvement through a culture of pursuing truth, excellence, beauty, cooperation, and heroically overcoming challenges.
The author believes understanding these points provides a scientific and inspiring worldview. It can be the basis for laws and a natural religion to preserve European people and their connection to their ancestors and nature.”
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:41:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787583528592429057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787578815318729162
INDIVIDUAL-ISM IS A PRODUCT OF COMMONS-ISM IS A PRODUCT OF HERO-ISM FOR THE COMMON GOOD
–“I try to think of genetic “self” preservation like Asimov’s 3 Laws of Robotics”–
(Ethocentism)
Unfortunately while individual maximization of potential is both practical in individual, economic, and political application, and as such is an optimum product of the commons of a polity, no man is an island, and as such all human achievement of potential is and always will be a product of his participation in and regulation by a commons produced by a polity. As such, as with many sophistries in philosophy, Asimov’s three laws depend upon a polity to produce and necessitate them as a commons.
And secondly, because this is another sophistic metaphysical presumption, the time preference of one’s criteria for decision making such as you’ve demonstrated by the choice of the limit of genetic persistence of the group genome, morphology, phenotype, civilization, and culture, is also a product of the capacity of the polity to produce commons sufficient to extend both individual and group time preference to that limit.
While at first glance this may seem contrary to your ambitions to preserve an ethnostate, the opposite is true. It’s a vindication of it.
As such, justifying the pursuit of power to institutionalize delay of gratification by extending time preference in the production of the optimum discovered and known commons for both past present and future: Whiteness: the institutional demand for the individual responsibility for the spectrum of private to common for shared producers of that commons, and responsibility for the past debt to ancestors, present cost of commons for one another, and transfer of that inheritance and cost as investment for future generations: producing continuous evolution in duty to truth, excellence, beauty and the institution of discounts on complex cooperation, stress, uncertainty, and mindfulness and culture of heroism in their production.
If you understand this it is both science, profound, inspirational, the foundation of a natural religion of European people for their ancestors and nature, and the criteria for the foundations of law to persist our people.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:16:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787577132022915073
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787544074200773072
I am trying to leave choices open for those who differ so they can choose their way and we choose ours.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 16:44:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787523854895645161
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787520674250002565
(not wanting to criticize, because that’s got a grain of truth in it but it’s also a naturalistic fallacy. Meaning we cannot choose not to cooperate with others as individuals, but we may cooperate with others as a group, and we may integrate with others as a group – especially…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 16:01:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787513075878244725
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787511929876963454
(NLI Note)
Self-Organizing – In both embodiment and the physics chapters I have not adequately explained that the result of the discovery of opportunities and cooperation between assemblies (cells etc) to seize those opportunities, produces ‘self organizing’ behavior as a result. This term is well understood, particularly in economics, which does operationalize the reasons why (Incentives and exchanges) humans produce self organizing.
However, outside of economics we require the work in this volume to explain what we currently know of self organizing – though as Michael Levin has pointed out we aren’t sure exactly how bioelectric cooperation between cells produces body form (though I suspect I could enumerate possible ways and that they’d be be small in number and likely obvious (polarity, accumulated bias in charge).
So we’ll have to go through the two chapters and ensure that we’ve tied the disciplines together with the use of that term.
Why did we miss it? I think because we were so concerned about integration of the inputs transformations and outputs that we didn’t tie the disciplines together with the term.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 15:20:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787502733437648896