Racism is natural and beneficial self defense by more genetically pacified, cognitively and emotionally evolved, and culturally advanced, people from less pacified, evolved, and advanced peoples. Fix brown superstition, free riding, criminality, and violence, or we must separate.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-03 11:15:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268139236814880768
Reply addressees: @SadiqKhan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268136900465954817
Racism is natural and beneficial self defense by more genetically pacified, cognitively and emotionally evolved, and culturally advanced, people from less pacified, evolved, and advanced peoples. Fix brown superstition, free riding, criminality, and violence, or we must separate.
Reply addressees: @SadiqKhan
—“Can you relate in-group vs out-group to morality = reciprocity ?”—Scott Claremont
Morality = Rules of cooperation INGROUP VS OUTGROUP 1. Ingroup, 2. outgroup … a. outgroup trade, … b. outgroup boycott, … c. outgroup competitor, … d. outgroup parasite … e. outgroup predator Ingroup by definition = cooperation (moral) Ingroup always requires reciprocity. Ingroup oten requires investment (risk) Ingroup often requires insurance Ingroup may require subsidy. Outgroup by definition only requires utility. Outgroup may or may not require reciprocity Outgroup does not require investment (risk) Outgroup does not demand insurance Outgroup does not require subsidy. Outgroup non-cooperation is dis-utilitarian Outgroup non-cooperation does not require reciprocity Outgroup non-cooperation does not require investment Outgroup non-cooperation does not require insurance Outgroup non-cooperation does not require subsidy Outgroup enemy is harmful Outgroup enemy requires irreciprocity Outgroup enemy requires costs to impose costs Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their insurance Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their subsidies Lesson: you can’t use one rule for scale. Humans are monkeys that want to imitate or follow a single pre-cognitive intuitions rather than think (remember or reason). But spectra require disambiguation and thought. There are no points(ideal types) only lines (spectra).
—“Can you relate in-group vs out-group to morality = reciprocity ?”—Scott Claremont
Morality = Rules of cooperation INGROUP VS OUTGROUP 1. Ingroup, 2. outgroup … a. outgroup trade, … b. outgroup boycott, … c. outgroup competitor, … d. outgroup parasite … e. outgroup predator Ingroup by definition = cooperation (moral) Ingroup always requires reciprocity. Ingroup oten requires investment (risk) Ingroup often requires insurance Ingroup may require subsidy. Outgroup by definition only requires utility. Outgroup may or may not require reciprocity Outgroup does not require investment (risk) Outgroup does not demand insurance Outgroup does not require subsidy. Outgroup non-cooperation is dis-utilitarian Outgroup non-cooperation does not require reciprocity Outgroup non-cooperation does not require investment Outgroup non-cooperation does not require insurance Outgroup non-cooperation does not require subsidy Outgroup enemy is harmful Outgroup enemy requires irreciprocity Outgroup enemy requires costs to impose costs Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their insurance Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their subsidies Lesson: you can’t use one rule for scale. Humans are monkeys that want to imitate or follow a single pre-cognitive intuitions rather than think (remember or reason). But spectra require disambiguation and thought. There are no points(ideal types) only lines (spectra).
SOVEREIGNTARIANISM REQUIRES RECIPROCAL INSURANCE: LOVE.
—“There is a lot of brotherly love and care for each other over here. That’s a very noble thing in a world of radical individualism.”– Noah J Revoy
We talk about rule of law, but that’s our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, leftist evil. We mention sovereignty, which is the objective. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire.
SOVEREIGNTARIANISM REQUIRES RECIPROCAL INSURANCE: LOVE.
—“There is a lot of brotherly love and care for each other over here. That’s a very noble thing in a world of radical individualism.”– Noah J Revoy
We talk about rule of law, but that’s our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, leftist evil. We mention sovereignty, which is the objective. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire.
EXCHANGE OF KIN AS SECURITY
—“Uncle Curt, what was it called when Kings would exchange Princes for a required amount of time, and keep as their ward the exchanged Prince? As this was keep the Peace.”—
Meaning changes over time. So that’s why it doesn’t immediately come to you. Hostage: “a lodger held by a landlord as security”. It’s hostage, although it means something more like ‘guest held as security’. The modern meaning has been twisted – and fairly recently. COMPARISONS A hostage held as security under guarantee of safety vs a hostage hold for ransom under threat of harm. So it’s held as hostage (safe), vs held for ransom (harm). ETYMOLOGY hostage (n.) late 13c., from Old French ostage, hostage “kindness, hospitality; residence, dwelling; rent, tribute; compensation; guarantee, pledge, bail; person given as security or hostage” (11c., Modern French ôtage), which is of uncertain origin. Either from hoste “guest” (see host (n.1)) via notion of “a lodger held by a landlord as security” [Watkins, Barnhart]; or else from Late Latin obsidanus “condition of being held as security,” from obses “hostage,” from ob- “before” + base of sedere “to sit,” with spelling influenced by Latin hostis. [OED, Century Dictionary]
EXCHANGE OF KIN AS SECURITY
—“Uncle Curt, what was it called when Kings would exchange Princes for a required amount of time, and keep as their ward the exchanged Prince? As this was keep the Peace.”—
Meaning changes over time. So that’s why it doesn’t immediately come to you. Hostage: “a lodger held by a landlord as security”. It’s hostage, although it means something more like ‘guest held as security’. The modern meaning has been twisted – and fairly recently. COMPARISONS A hostage held as security under guarantee of safety vs a hostage hold for ransom under threat of harm. So it’s held as hostage (safe), vs held for ransom (harm). ETYMOLOGY hostage (n.) late 13c., from Old French ostage, hostage “kindness, hospitality; residence, dwelling; rent, tribute; compensation; guarantee, pledge, bail; person given as security or hostage” (11c., Modern French ôtage), which is of uncertain origin. Either from hoste “guest” (see host (n.1)) via notion of “a lodger held by a landlord as security” [Watkins, Barnhart]; or else from Late Latin obsidanus “condition of being held as security,” from obses “hostage,” from ob- “before” + base of sedere “to sit,” with spelling influenced by Latin hostis. [OED, Century Dictionary]
EQUILIBRATING GENDER COGNITIVE LOAD: TRIBES
—“I’ve thought of who’s the most clearsighted of all. Is it married mothers with many children? Or is it some male category?”— atalay oral @baetsailray
WOMEN grow rational increasingly with each child, and my … educated guess .. is that female cognitive load evolved for five to six children, which his how many can survive at once in most conditions. Male nervous systems evolved to include the tribe, territory, and resources, of which females are a resource. So we deal with collections. Female nervous systems evolved to include her offspring: individuals. Until she ‘average’s a ‘tribe’ like males, she is not able to produce intuitive averages similar to males: TRIBE.
EQUILIBRATING GENDER COGNITIVE LOAD: TRIBES
—“I’ve thought of who’s the most clearsighted of all. Is it married mothers with many children? Or is it some male category?”— atalay oral @baetsailray
WOMEN grow rational increasingly with each child, and my … educated guess .. is that female cognitive load evolved for five to six children, which his how many can survive at once in most conditions. Male nervous systems evolved to include the tribe, territory, and resources, of which females are a resource. So we deal with collections. Female nervous systems evolved to include her offspring: individuals. Until she ‘average’s a ‘tribe’ like males, she is not able to produce intuitive averages similar to males: TRIBE.