That’s all there is to it. The rest is romantic language to evangelize it. The result limits us to adversarial justice before a jury, markets in cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities and war, and hiring administrators to govern our commons. That’s it. Period.
Reply addressees: @SpartanCowboy2 @party_blanket @John67415445 @StefanMolyneux
Theme: Cooperation
-
That’s all there is to it. The rest is romantic language to evangelize it. The r
-
THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY? The future increase in selec
THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY?
The future increase in selection pressure by intelligence is not a hard problem to solve at all. 1 – Groups divide by kinship interest, 2 – Elites for each group compete for and evolve their group. 3 – Limit bottom reproduction until marginal differences between groups are eliminated.
What’s the worst? Collecting the brightest in one polity thereby leaving all other polities behind, while fomenting conflict in that polity. What’s worst of all? Fomenting that conflict in the only laboring, working, lower-middle, and middle-class population that has developed high trust and truth-before-face, upon which the entire meritocratic edifice that gives the opportunity to those diverse elites is constructed – thereby ensuring the destruction of the high trust polity and return of kinship interest above all.
The world is not complex. If it seems so it is the lies used to circumvent the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; the lies used to circumvent that only Europeans discovered, applied, and adapted to them; and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, and disease; and that the world hates Europeans for doing so, and casts Europeans as oppressors as a proxy for nature and natures’ god, for most adapting to those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. That is the reason for european exceptionalism. And the world shudders and does everything possible to deny it.
So what is the real problem? By inventing the age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and spreading around the world, Europeans reunited mankind, sought to bring them to their level of adaptation to physical natural and evolutionary laws – and the world it seems, cannot adapt and do so.
And so by the middle of this century, just as the european colonial project failed, the Jewish cosmopolitan project in all its Marxist, postmodernist, feminist forms, will fail, and we will end the costly failed experiment, and return to a conflict of civilizations, led by core states, advancing kinship interests, cooperating by trade, in a world where we must once again develop civilizational trade routes to survive, which will place us once again into military conflict over the returns on those routes.
In other words, a return to normal, and a return to speciation, especially speciation by intelligence – just as we have always speciated. And the chance that I err herein approaches zero.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-18 18:28:00 UTC
-
by Luke Weinhagen Moral actions are those that consists of the sub-set of behavi
by Luke Weinhagen
Moral actions are those that consists of the sub-set of behavioral adaptations, within the limits of reciprocity that allows the production/accumulation of trust, and preserves an in-group’s capacity for intergenerational transfer of value.
Reciprocity[guards against decreases in trust]—Amoral[trust neutral]—Moral[promotes increases in trust]
CD: Nice take
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-17 17:04:00 UTC
-
MORALITY Falsify the following statement: The only displays, words or deeds that
MORALITY
Falsify the following statement:
The only displays, words or deeds that are not criminal, unethical, or immoral consist of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition upon the costs of the demonstrated interests of others – a condition we call ‘reciprocity’ (PRODUCTIVITY, GAIN)
Because only such display, word, and deed, avoids the production of the incentive for retaliation for imposition of costs against against demonstrated interests, and as a consequence the continuous cumulative reversal of the incentives to cooperate, rather than return to the natural self and group interest to engage in boycott, parasitism, or predation. (COST, LOSS )
As such any display word or deed that is not immoral is either amoral or moral – where we demarcate the amoral from the moral by the requirement under morality for transfer of increases in demonstrated interests directly or indirectly by externality. (INVESTMENT)
Individuals demonstrate instinctual differences in moral biases, and seek to advance those biases as rather than moral preference but moral weight and measure, when such biases are merely expressions of genetic and reproductive interests, and as such serve as negotiating positions – terms of voluntary cooperation. (ADVERTISING)
Groups of individuals produce compromise norms that satisfy these same criteria. (MARKETS)
But in all cases, via negativa, all conflicts are decidable by tests of reciprocity – which is precisely how all cases in the world are judged. (JURISPRUDENCE)
In other words: morality is empirical. It’s Reciprocity within the limits of individual, normative, or universal demands.
(You won’t falsify that.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-17 14:05:00 UTC
-
Wrong question. Why should those of us that invest in defense, institutions, com
Wrong question. Why should those of us that invest in defense, institutions, commons, markets tolerate you and your free riding instead of replacing you with someone who isn’t a dead weight, and forcing you out, hanging you, or fining you?
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 16:28:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272566691432665090
Reply addressees: @pinktastic615 @ChillAnarchist @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272565602138361856
-
Wrong question. Why should those of us that invest in defense, institutions, com
Wrong question. Why should those of us that invest in defense, institutions, commons, markets tolerate you and your free riding instead of replacing you with someone who isn’t a dead weight, and forcing you out, hanging you, or fining you?
Reply addressees: @pinktastic615 @ChillAnarchist @JulieBorowski -
They demonstrate the failure of argumentation ethics: people don’t seek the trut
They demonstrate the failure of argumentation ethics: people don’t seek the truth. They seek to deprive the opposition of coercive interests.
avoidance< negotiation< cooperation >undermining >conflict
That’s what people do.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 15:48:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272556528738992131
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @jamesfoxhiggins @Sexy_Cave_Beast @StefanMolyneux @JohnMarkSays @WorMartiN @Jay_D007
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272555856404586496
-
They demonstrate the failure of argumentation ethics: people don’t seek the trut
They demonstrate the failure of argumentation ethics: people don’t seek the truth. They seek to deprive the opposition of coercive interests.
avoidance< negotiation< cooperation >undermining >conflict
That’s what people do.
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @jamesfoxhiggins @Sexy_Cave_Beast @StefanMolyneux @JohnMarkSays @WorMartiN @Jay_D007 -
If you think I’m wrong, then stop and presume otherwise. Either you don’t unders
If you think I’m wrong, then stop and presume otherwise. Either you don’t understand, or I’m baiting you into a game where everyone can learn. (including me). Men love to compete.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 14:27:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271811476869853184
-
If you think I’m wrong, then stop and presume otherwise. Either you don’t unders
If you think I’m wrong, then stop and presume otherwise. Either you don’t understand, or I’m baiting you into a game where everyone can learn. (including me). Men love to compete.