Theme: Cooperation

  • Because the content does not roll out constantly, but they want to ‘be involved’

    Because the content does not roll out constantly, but they want to ‘be involved’, they have developed a community that discusses all sorts of nonsense.

    We have split it into different forums so that serious and non-serious content can be separated.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-20 20:31:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803888396479402212

    Reply addressees: @TheoAdoreDore @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803862562531885336

  • “The right does not need to, nor is it likely to, unify – it needs to align in t

    —“The right does not need to, nor is it likely to, unify – it needs to align in the defeat of the enemy:
    Frith: Peace between kith and kin;
    Grith (Kings Peace): Truce with those who are aligned.
    –Heiðrūn ( @freefolkworks )


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-16 16:43:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1802381493421174931

  • “The right does not need to, nor is it likely to, unify – it needs to align in t

    —“The right does not need to, nor is it likely to, unify – it needs to align in the defeat of the enemy:
    Frith: Peace between kith and kin;
    Grith (Kings Peace): Truce with those who are aligned.
    –Heiðrūn ( @freefolkworks )


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-16 16:43:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1802381493353988096

  • MORE ON FEMALE FRIENDSHIPS. So, I can think of a few women, one who is gay, the

    MORE ON FEMALE FRIENDSHIPS.
    So, I can think of a few women, one who is gay, the other straight and married in particular, and a number of my assistants, who I both counted on for advice, trusted with everything, and still deeply care about. There are others that were relationship… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1800553572104323565


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-11 17:38:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800583513294455248

  • FEMINISM AND WITCHCRAFT? 😉 –“The modern version of Lysistrata [Aristophanes’ p

    FEMINISM AND WITCHCRAFT? 😉
    –“The modern version of Lysistrata [Aristophanes’ play] serves no greater purpose than to demand that men cooperate with women en masse even as women defect against men. It’s an attempt to eat your cake while still having it, and it has been wildly… https://t.co/K8Y6K1TPcZ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-11 14:15:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800532311508664490

  • THE LAW OF RIGHTS 1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desir

    THE LAW OF RIGHTS
    1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desired, a want must be brought into existence. (Need for Non Aggression to permit Cooperation.)
    2. A right always consists of agreement with others, to produce insurance and responsibility to enforce that insurance – as such rights are a always and everywhere a political construct. (Informal Contract)
    3. Some rights are necessary for cohabitation and cooperation – self determination by self determined means by insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity in our demonstrated investments. (Natural Rights)
    4. Some rights are utilitarian in the collective search for scale, and the returns on scale. (Commons)
    5. Some rights are arbitrary. (Privileges that impose on the returns from the production of commons.)
    6. Some rights are violations even if we don’t recognize them as such. (Violate Sovereignty and Reciprocity)
    7. Some rights are harms and we do recognize them as such, but the rights that come before them inhibit our ability to revoke them. (Undermine responsibility for insurance of the sovereignty, reciprocity,, and produce incentive for non-cooperation, non-cohabitation, separation, and if necessary war.)

    Political, social, and economic orders form when the wants of individuals are sufficient to produce an agreement for non aggression against demonstrated investments and responsibility for reciprocal insurance against aggression, rather than the state of avoidance, parasitism, or predation and the costs of that defense.

    Political social and economic orders collapse when the arbitrary, the violations, and the harms accumulate sufficiently to terminate the incentive to cooperate and thus generate demand to separate, or defeat, or decimate.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 15:17:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798011171074723840

  • THE LAW OF RIGHTS 1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desir

    THE LAW OF RIGHTS
    1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desired, a want must be brought into existence. (Need for Non Aggression to permit Cooperation.)
    2. A right always consists of agreement with others, to produce insurance and responsibility to enforce that insurance – as such rights are a always and everywhere a political construct. (Informal Contract)
    3. Some rights are necessary for cohabitation and cooperation – self determination by self determined means by insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity in our demonstrated investments. (Natural Rights)
    4. Some rights are utilitarian in the collective search for scale, and the returns on scale. (Commons)
    5. Some rights are arbitrary. (Privileges that impose on the returns from the production of commons.)
    6. Some rights are violations even if we don’t recognize them as such. (Violate Sovereignty and Reciprocity)
    7. Some rights are harms and we do recognize them as such, but the rights that come before them inhibit our ability to revoke them. (Undermine responsibility for insurance of the sovereignty, reciprocity,, and produce incentive for non-cooperation, non-cohabitation, separation, and if necessary war.)

    Political, social, and economic orders form when the wants of individuals are sufficient to produce an agreement for non aggression against demonstrated investments and responsibility for reciprocal insurance against aggression, rather than the state of avoidance, parasitism, or predation and the costs of that defense.

    Political social and economic orders collapse when the arbitrary, the violations, and the harms accumulate sufficiently to terminate the incentive to cooperate and thus generate demand to separate, or defeat, or decimate.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @Homeschool_LLC @forgeoffreedom


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 15:16:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798010981597016064

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798005801438880062

  • Like many things the simple imitations we do within our groups are evolved utili

    Like many things the simple imitations we do within our groups are evolved utilitarianisms. When we cooperate with outgroups our ingroup morals are irrelevant since it is violation of the outgroup’s morals that causes retaliation. When we predict outcomes of any group, all groups, the moral standard of weights and measures (universals) are how we both distinguish between groups and resolve conflicts between them.

    Ingroup morality: the set of via positiva rules we live by.
    Outgroup morality: pure pragmatism
    Universally Decidable Morality: the set of via negativa rules we must live by to avoid retaliation, conflict, and war.

    Conflict between groups is universally decidable (via neutral)
    Conflict within groups is decidable by variation from positivas.
    Conflict across groups is predictable by variation from universal decidabily (via negativa)

    I am not sure why this is hard to understand but it seems to be challenging for a lot of people.

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 19:09:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796619922023272449

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796618485738410070

  • “The internet has made every woman delusional.”– (a woman) Context: The collaps

    –“The internet has made every woman delusional.”– (a woman)

    Context: The collapse of dating, mating, reproduction, family, intersexual relations, and political cooperation. Why? Because women are suggestible rather than rational, and the resulting success of the marxist sequence’s capture of European feminism (legal equality) with marxist sewing of sex, class, cultural, and racial conflict – in order to march through the institutions of cultural production, in order to destroy western knowledge, traditions, cultural memory, and institutions that are the LEAST divisive and LEAST constraining in the world, by claiming ‘whiteness’ is oppression rather than a demand for integration into middle class responsibility for self, the private, and the common.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-27 19:40:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795178401432502274

  • Nope. it’s evidence that well meaning men can misunderstand one another but stil

    Nope. it’s evidence that well meaning men can misunderstand one another but still come to terms and seek to understand. ;). I mean, I’d rather we convince people of that more so than any other point. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:45:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793382663832650158

    Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793378753764376660