Theme: Cooperation

  • Me: takes a shopping cart from a random little old lady so she doesn’t have to w

    Me: takes a shopping cart from a random little old lady so she doesn’t have to walk it across the lot.
    Her: “Do you need it?”
    Me: “No. Just putting it away for you”.
    Her: “wow. a surprise.”
    Me: “Shouldn’t be. We all did it – not long ago”

    “Whiteness”. Manners. It was the norm.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:35:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325945147981524994

  • The lower working and middle classes in european civilization practice ‘whitenes

    The lower working and middle classes in european civilization practice ‘whiteness’ (the european group strategy) despite its high personal cost to them, because the benefits to all are so much higher than all alternatives. Other peoples can’t do it w/o equal ethnic homogeneity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 18:44:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325871818943553537

  • same difference. idea is not to cut them out but to force exchanges (trades)

    same difference. idea is not to cut them out but to force exchanges (trades).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-08 00:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325235970040532992

    Reply addressees: @____DT__

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325233822288519170

  • The grant of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity is itself recipro

    The grant of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity is itself reciprocal. Meaning that if we do not obtain self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity in exchange from others then they’re ‘outside the law’. Meaning, outside of moral constraint.

    Meaning “Prey”.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-07 23:19:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325216226470211584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325216225333563394


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    European civ, where ethnically European Americans are some of the last survivors, was created by our ancient law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, commons before self (duty), truth before face, survival in adversarial markets (merit), limiting reproduction.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1325216225333563394

  • Whiteness : The Hand of God

    “Whiteness” isn’t oppression, it’s evolutionary domestication of lesser evolved peoples by the continuation of natural selection using self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, adversarial markets, and the suppression of reproduction of those that can’t compete. Whiteness=Nature. Nature = formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. THose laws are the laws of nature and nature’s god. Whiteness = God’s Hand. Christianity made whiteness tolerable by the underclasses, whose only excellence is excellence in doing no harm. This is the secret to western civilization and the reason for the Germanization of Christianity. Representative Democracy can never achieve anything other than voting an oligarchy into or out of office. Representative Democracy produces no goods other than emotional security. Direct democracy that assents or vetos appropriations within the natural law of the european people, can limit the production of harms or bads. So, Instead, it’s “Whiteness”: RULE OF LAW of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and cooperation by adversarial competition in markets in everything, and the absence of arbitrary authority. All other people fail. Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’: reproductive persistence by self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, cooperation by adversarial competition,and markets in everything. Group differences are the result of genetic load (Defect), more so than genetic (behavioral) advantage. The difference between classes subraces and races is accumulated genetic load (defect) by the absence of natural selection. We are, unfortunately, unwilling to solve the social, economic, political, and evolutionary problem of those with birth defects: those unable or unwilling to conform to ‘Whiteness’: The physical, natural, evolutionary laws. The solution of course is to take care of them despite their behavioral birth defects, but prohibit their reproduction, thereby ending that chain of defects. They handed us a softball by criticizing ‘whiteness’ thereby unknowingly confirming white superiority, because of the ignorance that white civilization is the most conformal with the laws of the universe – the laws of nature and nature’s god.    

  • Whiteness : The Hand of God

    “Whiteness” isn’t oppression, it’s evolutionary domestication of lesser evolved peoples by the continuation of natural selection using self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, adversarial markets, and the suppression of reproduction of those that can’t compete. Whiteness=Nature. Nature = formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. THose laws are the laws of nature and nature’s god. Whiteness = God’s Hand. Christianity made whiteness tolerable by the underclasses, whose only excellence is excellence in doing no harm. This is the secret to western civilization and the reason for the Germanization of Christianity. Representative Democracy can never achieve anything other than voting an oligarchy into or out of office. Representative Democracy produces no goods other than emotional security. Direct democracy that assents or vetos appropriations within the natural law of the european people, can limit the production of harms or bads. So, Instead, it’s “Whiteness”: RULE OF LAW of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and cooperation by adversarial competition in markets in everything, and the absence of arbitrary authority. All other people fail. Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’: reproductive persistence by self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, cooperation by adversarial competition,and markets in everything. Group differences are the result of genetic load (Defect), more so than genetic (behavioral) advantage. The difference between classes subraces and races is accumulated genetic load (defect) by the absence of natural selection. We are, unfortunately, unwilling to solve the social, economic, political, and evolutionary problem of those with birth defects: those unable or unwilling to conform to ‘Whiteness’: The physical, natural, evolutionary laws. The solution of course is to take care of them despite their behavioral birth defects, but prohibit their reproduction, thereby ending that chain of defects. They handed us a softball by criticizing ‘whiteness’ thereby unknowingly confirming white superiority, because of the ignorance that white civilization is the most conformal with the laws of the universe – the laws of nature and nature’s god.    

  • Whiteness Conspiracy Theory: Conformity to the physical natural and evolutionary

    Whiteness Conspiracy Theory: Conformity to the physical natural and evolutionary laws, using sovereignty, reciprocity and markets, provides adaptive advantage by reducing the friction of the underclass in the continuous reformation of Pareto distributions within those markets.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-06 13:07:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324699943488135168

    Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324699213201068032


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Steve_Sailer @mattyglesias Whiteness Conspiracy Theories: Whites earn their advantages. They discover, adapt to, and apply the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe including continuing natural selection by self determination under sovereignty, reciprocity and resulting markets. Period.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1324699213201068032

  • That’s what I meant by i’m not sure because consent requires ‘to what’ and need

    That’s what I meant by i’m not sure because consent requires ‘to what’ and need not be reciprocal.

    Reciprocal Agreement is by definition reciprocal.

    So parties consent to an agreement.
    Or parties consent to god knows what.
    So it’s more that I don’t know the unambiguous term.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 23:50:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324499350781861891

    Reply addressees: @NRxAuthors

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324498602245431298

  • Under rule of law you agree to the law in exchange for participation with others

    Under rule of law you agree to the law in exchange for participation with others in the territory. If you break that law, and don’t survive competition in the court,then you have a choice of restitution and punishment, or not. If not then as outside the law you’re ‘prey’ for all.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 23:44:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324497835438546949

  • Scientific Government: Resident, Citizen, and Participatory Incentives

    SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES Three Markets:

    • Via negativa market for juridical DEFENSE,
    • via reciproca markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (marriage), production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services (TRADE), and
    • via positiva markets for the production of commons (OFFENSE)

    And Three Classes:

    • All People require civil(private) juridical defense.
    • All Residents require institutional (govt) juridical defense.
    • All Citizens who have demonstrated competence and contribution to the commons may have access to political force(participation) by their achievements, creating Houses of the Classes as a market for the production of commons.

    Limiting participation to property-owning males having performed public service in military, emergency, or civilian corps – and extending it to their wives and children; increasing credit capacity and retirement benefits by their number of children produces optimum incentives. Creating a separate house of females as a substitute for the church may or may not constrain women’s natural hostility to capitalization vs hyperconsumption. We don’t yet know.