@JarvisWitts we have agreed to produce a platform and strategy on the condition all parties refrained n from taking the bait.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-18 20:10:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416852995787083778
@JarvisWitts we have agreed to produce a platform and strategy on the condition all parties refrained n from taking the bait.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-18 20:10:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416852995787083778
Again, disambiguate lawyering (bad), from judging, regulating, legislating, and constitutions, to the one constitution that would state the science of cooperation and means of resolving conflicts and producing commons. Schools teach lawyering. We teach the science of LAW.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-16 10:10:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1415977230241570818
Why limits on voluntary association are culturally damaging: many of us would live better(cheaper) lives in apartments and condos precisely because they’re lower overhead. But because we can’t regulate who we live with we can’t produce quality low-cost housing for ‘us’. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1413178610110828547
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-08 16:52:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1413179197221113859
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1413178610110828547
a karl (a leader) gains advantage (opportunities) by providing incentives to imitate or follow (or obey), and the result is the production of commons by scaling marginal indifference of task and time preference.
We’re bots.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-08 16:30:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1413173693992349698
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1413153826945658887
10) Others who come here(yourself included) do not want to pay the cost of loyalty(duty) to the army (polity), that produces high investment parenting, norms, and institutions for the production of those who are fit for production of commons, and fit for self-sufficiency in them.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 23:37:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411469271876710402
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411469270853292034
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
9) Europeans pay the high cost of continuous adaptation – and it is costly in reason, psychology, emotion, and action.
So we produce a high investment parenting in producing people FIT for producing COMMONS and suppressing the reproduction of those unfit for producing commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411469270853292034
Or let’s put it differently: all organizations adapt to opportunities. As such we must always produce competitive organizations to deprive one another of parasitic opportunities, limiting them to productive opportunities despite the higher cost of productivity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:58:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411444155021246468
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411440725305315330
Wrong question. Can humans produce a condition of reciprocity and proportionality, with a system of rules we call the law, and a system of organizations that facilitate cooperation and dispute resolution? Then yes. The problem is preventing parasitism. Libertarianism=parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:18:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411434194102853636
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411433332332797955
16. Isn’t the only solution continuing the 5000 years of European evolutionary success using a universal militia, where all members insure one another’s self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty via truth, reciprocity, proportionality, and rule of law? https://t.co/KpVOXI4vV3



Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414339475619842
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414335256248323
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
15. Isn’t libertarianism just another iteration of the Abrahamic method of false promise: inserting another column into this table of the history of Abrahamic methods of false promise? https://t.co/0EMlVjBDhR
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414335256248323
… of freedom from physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws? (Meaning: Scarcity, amorality, self-interest, reciprocity, proportionality, mutation, genetic load, the necessity of natural selection, and necessity of defeating the red queen?) https://t.co/f8EJZwXhA1

Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414326234292229
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414322169929728
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
13. Isn’t rothbardianism a false promise of freedom from the physical laws of the universe: the logical, the physical, the behavioral, and the evolutionary? So isn’t rothbardianism simply an evolution of marxism, which is a false promise (Fraud) … https://t.co/PNSjOg6QsI
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414322169929728
the incentive for cooperation among all animals consists of categories of opportunity, productivity, and insurance. It’s just economics. and as such it’s just physics. intelligence just assists the economics, and physics.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-01 01:13:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1410406132913410057