The majority women confusing taking care of one another with enabling one another.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 20:04:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869836124757397504
The majority women confusing taking care of one another with enabling one another.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 20:04:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869836124757397504
The science says that reduction of frictions of cooperation and production of incentives for coopreation that produce economic velocity, increases in energy capture per capita, increases in choices that result and create a virtuous cycle of the compression of time per capture of energy. There is no economic theory that disagrees with this. There can’t be. It’s just physics. Instead, we struggle over how much we an abuse those laws to attempt to accelerate that capture. And this matters because all economic, political, military, and strategic conflict is just a matter of population, economy, technology, and comparative advantage.
Again, it’s just physics. You can attempt to cheat these laws for some time and of course some groups do but the equilbrium always returns and there are no exceptions. Humans are just batteries that attempt to compress energy into time in a virtuous circle just like all the universe does the same.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-18 22:48:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869515038446518272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869513841824178369
As I said, and you deny with regularity – the anglosphere built the world empire and united the world empire into a pseudo-empire by the optimum means of cooperation – trade – from which every single participant without exception benefitted more than those few that did not.
However, the fact that the ideology could ‘free ride’ on that geopolitical strategy precisely because of the scientific, economic, cultural, and political dominance of that pseudo-empire is an entirely separate dimension of causality whose correction at the time was not as useful as it’s correction is in the present time. As such ‘correction is in proces’.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @ArcologyTech
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:25:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868391989781401600
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868391126874341501
–“Morality as its evolutionary purpose, increasing the fitness of a genetically related tribe via internal cooperation and altruistic punishment for crime and defection. It doesn’t work on either individual or global level.”–
Again, you are trying to redefine morality…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 19:58:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868385258770706756
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868383363989479509
MY POINT HERE: Marriage and Family Create Common Interest from Which High Trust Can Evolve and Without Which It Cannot. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1868024497850462331
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-14 20:24:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868029208842363088
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1868024497850462331
MY POINT HERE: Marriage and Family Create Common Interest from Which High Trust Can Evolve and Without Which It Cannot.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-14 20:24:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868029208796205056
WHAT IF WE ARE RETURNING TO MOST MEN AND WOMEN LIVING SEPARATE LIVES – AND DURABLE MARRIAGE IS LIMITED TO UPPER CLASSES AGAIN?
Men and women living shared lives is not the norm in human history. It’s a product of agrarianism – and we’re a post-agrarian civilization. In the not-too-distant past men spent most of their time with men, and women with women. The irish only stopped serial marriage in the 1800s. The jews only in the 1500s. There are still populations in east asia where men visit at night and otherwise stay with their families. Today, in africa, there are still groups where men and women live in different buildings.
There is no longer a need for marriage for a woman to maintain self sufficiency. Even for her to have a child. There is no longer an incentive other than affection and sex for many people to maintain long term relationships.
So was farming an unnatural aberration and are we returning to hunter gatherer and early agrarian relationships?
On the other hand given the collapse of reproduction among such people, and less so among the traditional nuclear family, and even less so among the traditional extended family group, are we going to breed out those people from the polity? (It’s happening already).
My point here is that marriage is an extraordinary advantage for SOME – where the family is of higher value than individual freedom in its absence. But it is not for others. And moreover, if we restore liability for interference in a marriage, end child support, alimony, and common property leaving costs to the custodial parent, then incentives will do their work, the malincentives for divorce – largely to the detriment of men and children – will be suppressed again. The consequences would include a suppression of marriage for those unfit for it, and a preservation of marriage for those fit for it. And the resulting eugenic consequences of that policy.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-14 20:05:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868024497674272768
There is a difference between being correct and employing correctness suicidally. It doesn’t matter if the lost boys of the right are correct if they burn every bridge extended to them. Which they do. Every single time. The definition of madness is repeatedly repeating what…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 19:28:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867652759392244185
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @pundasdad @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867652070654030316
(a) Laws of nature result in the natural law of cooperation.
(b) christian ethics are largely compatible with natural law. The open question is the problem of creating weakness by christian universalism instead of nationalism, or at least, only between christians – else…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-05 17:05:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864717640750764075
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864711373688602713
POSSIBLE CAUSES FOR THE PERPETUATION OF ADHD TRAITS
–“Group success often depends on diverse personality and cognitive types.”–
1. Adaptive Advantages in Evolutionary Contexts
Hyperfocus and Creativity:
Traits associated with ADHD, such as hyperfocus during periods of intense interest, may have been advantageous for solving complex problems or innovating.
Enhanced creativity and novel problem-solving skills would have been valuable in dynamic or changing environments.
Exploration and Risk-Taking:
High impulsivity and novelty-seeking behavior, common in ADHD, may have conferred survival benefits in hunter-gatherer societies:
Foragers: Individuals prone to explore new territories, resources, or methods of survival may have benefited their groups.
Scouts: High-risk, high-reward behaviors could have been advantageous for discovering food sources or avoiding threats.
Rapid Response and Vigilance:
ADHD-like traits may enhance alertness to environmental changes, benefiting individuals in roles requiring quick reactions or adaptability (e.g., during hunting or combat).
2. Trade-Offs in Cognitive and Behavioral Traits
Short-Term Advantages vs. Long-Term Costs:
The impulsivity and distractibility of ADHD may lead to short-term successes in certain high-stakes or dynamic situations, offsetting the longer-term disadvantages.
Specialization in Group Dynamics:
In a tribal setting, individuals with ADHD-like traits may have filled unique niches, complementing those with more consistent focus and planning skills.
Group success often depends on diverse personality and cognitive types.
3. Balancing Selection
Heterozygote Advantage:Genes associated with ADHD may confer advantages in heterozygous states, while homozygous expression results in more severe manifestations of the disorder.
This dynamic maintains genetic diversity within the population.
Environmental Dependence:
Traits that are maladaptive in modern, sedentary, and structured societies may have been adaptive in ancestral environments.
Selection pressures can shift, making certain traits less advantageous without entirely removing them.
4. Gene-Pleiotropy and Overlap with Other Traits
Shared Genetic Pathways:
ADHD-associated genes may also influence other traits that are highly adaptive, such as intelligence, creativity, or social influence.
For example, genes affecting dopamine signaling may enhance reward sensitivity, increasing motivation in some contexts despite leading to impulsivity in others.
Pleiotropic Effects:
Genes involved in ADHD may also play roles in other biological systems or behaviors, making them resistant to negative selection because they provide overall net benefits.
5. Modern Mismatch with Evolutionary Context
ADHD traits may have been adaptive in environments requiring high mobility, rapid adaptation, and risk-taking but are less so in modern settings that prioritize sustained attention, routine, and long-term planning.
The rise of structured educational systems and workplace environments may have highlighted ADHD as a disorder rather than an adaptive variant.
6. Weak Selection Pressure Against ADHD
ADHD does not typically result in significantly reduced reproductive fitness:Many individuals with ADHD have children and pass on their genes.
The disorder often manifests more as a variation in behavioral traits rather than as a catastrophic condition that would eliminate carriers from the gene pool.
Examples of ADHD Traits in Historical or Evolutionary Contexts
Explorers and Innovators: Risk-taking and novelty-seeking traits associated with ADHD likely drove exploration, discovery, and technological advances.
Leaders in Crisis: Impulsivity and rapid decision-making may have been valuable in chaotic or high-pressure situations.
Group Success: Diversity in cognitive styles ensured that groups could respond to a wider range of challenges and opportunities.
Summary
The persistence of ADHD in the population likely reflects a balance between its adaptive benefits in certain contexts and its modern disadvantages in structured, sedentary societies. ADHD traits are maintained because they provide group-level or individual-level advantages in dynamic, unpredictable environments, outweighing their costs under ancestral conditions. Natural selection operates on the totality of traits and their contributions to survival and reproduction, and ADHD traits appear to have played a meaningful role in human evolution.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-04 19:41:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864394504389971970