Theme: Cooperation

  • Self regulation requires self determiniation. Herd behavior requires collective

    Self regulation requires self determiniation. Herd behavior requires collective determination. Pack behavior requires self determination.
    You buy herd adaptability by surrender of self determination and self regulation.
    You buy climbing the dominance hierarchy by the opposite. https://twitter.com/hoeberian/status/1450152399994294277

  • So in P-Law we operationalize sociology as “Compatibilism, Cooperationism, and T

    So in P-Law we operationalize sociology as “Compatibilism, Cooperationism, and Trifunctionalism”
    We’re compatible – near opposites.
    We’re able to cooperate, and cooperation provides decidability on ‘goods’ (vs bads)
    There are three means of influence and we organize by them. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1450146798564171779

  • “Q: CURT CAN YOU EXPLAIN FIRE GAZING ETC IN MEN?” We are seeking signals of non-

    “Q: CURT CAN YOU EXPLAIN FIRE GAZING ETC IN MEN?”

    We are seeking signals of non-aggression from one another – women by social non-aggression, and men by physical non-aggression. Yet we are female-empathic-social super predators and male-physical-political superpredators.

    We developed many ‘technologies’ and ‘adaptations’ so that we could release the stresses of self-regulation of female social superpredation, and male political superpredation.

    This is why we evolved by neoteny – just like dogs from wolves – by slowing the rate of maturity so that we could develop agency. So what we see in female antisocial behavior and male anti-social behavior is female internalization and emotional-social self-and-other harm, and male externalization and physical self-and-other harm.

    Likewise, we developed externalization of emotional stress as chatter between women (providing ‘mindfulness’) and externalization of emotional stress between males in fire gazing, or hunting, or sport-watching, (giving us time for our stresses to run down) trash-talking, and loyalty signaling. Or as we traditionally said: women say kindnesses they don’t mean, and men say insults they don’t mean, and this is how we ameliorate the stress of our ‘mammalian’ instincts.

    This is also the source of religion which is largely for the satisfaction of female need for mindfulness, and campfire-sitting, sport or debate, which is largely for the satisfaction of male need for mindfulness.

    It is also why women and men both change the subject whenever the opposite sex walks into the room. Because it reintroduces intersexual stress, and prevents intra-sexual stress reduction.

    We are pretty simple animals really. It’s all the stories we tell one another instead of the truth that makes life seem complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-18 16:17:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107123430366804576

  • @KnightofGab We are seeking for signals of non-aggression from one another – wom

    @KnightofGab We are seeking for signals of non-aggression from one another – women by social non aggression, and men by physical non-aggression. Yet we are female-empathic-social super predators, and male-physical-political superpredators.

    We developed many ‘technologies’ and ‘adaptations’ so that we could release the stresses of self regulation of female social superpredation, and male political superpredation.

    This is why we evolved by neoteny – just like dogs from wolves – by slowing the rate of maturity so that we could develop agency. So what we see in female antisocial behavior and male anti social behavior is female internalization, and emotional-social self-and-other harm, and male externalization and physical self-and-other harm.

    Likewise we developed externalization of emotional stress as chatter between women (providing ‘mindfulness’) and externalization of emotional stress between males in fire gazing, or hunting, or sport-watching, (giving us time for our stresses to run down) trash talking, and loyalty signaling. Or as we traditinoally said: women say kindnesses they don’t mean, and men say insults they don’t mean, and this is how we ameliorate the stress of our ‘mammalian’ instincts.

    This is also the source of religion which is largely for the satisfaction of female need for mindfulness, and campfire-sitting, sport or debate, which is largely for the satisfaction of male need for mindfulness.

    It is also why women and men both change the subject whenever the opposite sex walks into the room. Because it reintroduces intersexual stress, and prevents intra-sexual stress reduction.

    We are pretty simple animals really. It’s all the stories we tell one another instead of the truth that makes life seem complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-18 16:15:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107123424771840830

  • Yes relationships require we learn the difference between hearing, listening, co

    Yes relationships require we learn the difference between hearing, listening, considering, and what’s worth discussing. Most human speech consists of thinking out loud, and trust relationships let us do so safely. Much speech is just anger, frustration, or joy release. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-18 13:12:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1450087509246070795

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @ShannonConsta15 @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1450085942761504771

  • Ex Wife: “The secret to a happy marriage is low expectations”. This is a humorou

    Ex Wife: “The secret to a happy marriage is low expectations”.
    This is a humorous restatement of the other person can’t carry you. You have to carry one another.
    My version is: “All unhappiness results from people wanting others to act against their rational self interests.” https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1449834745001652228

  • @Graphic Just watch the two segments on consciousness. It’s just a deterministic

    @Graphic Just watch the two segments on consciousness. It’s just a deterministic effect of memory and cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-16 20:41:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107113146042906318

  • NEXT SUBJECT: REDIRECTION OF THE FEMALE INTO PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR I wish I hadn’t

    NEXT SUBJECT: REDIRECTION OF THE FEMALE INTO PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR

    I wish I hadn’t gone down this path of trying to understand the problems of present dating culture, because it’s a sinkhole of depressing catastrophe for both sexes – and for the polity. It’s as bad as opioids and woke. And I’ve learned nothing new about female antisocial behavior.

    Tim gave me work to do: now that I’ve articulated female antisocial behavior, I need to articulate female prosocial behavior – meaning prohibiting using seduction just as we prohibited men from using violence.

    — ” IMHO, your time would be better spent learning about female prosocial behavior in the West, and articulating it with the same detail you’ve done Western male prosocial behavior. ” — Tim

    — ” The main reason I do that is that liberal (feminine) side seems to rely on what they signal rather than revealed preference and what fembrains signal is values of the dominant narrative rather than their own. ” — Martin

    Is their dominant narrative ever anything other than the female sexual imperative in different dress: adaptation, cost, responsibility, accountability, evasion?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-16 13:18:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107111402233606666

  • I mean that they destroy one another rather than reconcile. “Hell hath no fury l

    I mean that they destroy one another rather than reconcile.

    “Hell hath no fury like a woman….”


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 20:47:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449114612864102402

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII @WorMartiN @EricLiford @WesternRenaiss2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449114374505787394

  • Five Types of Female Friends: 1. Caretaker (Sister, Mother) 2. Fun Time Friend (

    Five Types of Female Friends:
    1. Caretaker (Sister, Mother)
    2. Fun Time Friend (Risk Taker, Courageous)
    3. Independent Woman Friend (Mentor, emotional maturity)
    4. One-On-One Friend (Connection)
    5. Toxic Friend (Negative, Aggressive, Emotionally Draining)
    (Via Anna.)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 20:08:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449104957710417923