Theme: Constitutional Order

  • First quick read of the trump doc is that this is NYC clown world nonsense. Ther

    First quick read of the trump doc is that this is NYC clown world nonsense. There is no smoking gun. There isn’t anything substantively illegal. I’m not even sure there’s anything even vaguely questionable. I mean, hatred, envy, politics, grandstanding – and they broke a 200 year sacred tradition over it? This prosecution has to be disbarred for this abuse. This is exactly why we had that tradition. Now we’ll have to codify that tradition to prevent a recurrence.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-05 02:10:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643435797272469504

  • Team, and followers: Please thank Brandon (@ThruTheHayes) for the extraordinary

    Team, and followers:
    Please thank Brandon (@ThruTheHayes) for the extraordinary amount of time and patience he’s investing in helping me complete the constitution and the website content. And we haven’t even got close to working on the activism yet.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-04 18:31:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643320282839490560

  • Hardly. No need. Problems: Low trust – this is the funndamental source of all RU

    Hardly. No need.
    Problems:
    Low trust – this is the funndamental source of all RU issues, and only fixed by ROL and Transparency.
    Rule of Law not applied or respected.
    Weak constitution insufficently articulated.
    FSB power.

  • Hardly. No need. Problems: Low trust – this is the funndamental source of all RU

    Hardly. No need.
    Problems:
    Low trust – this is the funndamental source of all RU issues, and only fixed by ROL and Transparency.
    Rule of Law not applied or respected.
    Weak constitution insufficently articulated.
    FSB power.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-04 05:18:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643120812390490113

    Reply addressees: @JeremyR_Pearson @Book_of_Cyril

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643114451753730050

  • Via My Good Friend @bryanbrey keeping a pulse on things. IMO it’s just very diff

    Via My Good Friend @bryanbrey keeping a pulse on things.
    IMO it’s just very difficult to see this change if for no other reason than rule of law draws currency, and we put rule of law first more than any other country. https://t.co/LsrszsfOF3


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:27:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643017312461545476

  • JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES (justice vs fairness vs equality vs

    JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
    (justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
    Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.

    The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.

    Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?

    Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.

    Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.

    The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.

    And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132890456064

  • JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES (justice vs fairness vs equality vs

    JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
    (justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
    Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.

    The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.

    Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?

    Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.

    Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.

    The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.

    And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132693213184

  • RT @StevePender: Rights (freedoms of action) are constructed in real time. They

    RT @StevePender: Rights (freedoms of action) are constructed in real time. They are not immovable assets, passively referenced, like a hous…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 08:47:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642810998762479617

  • 1) It’s not a high crime, and violates the principle of innocence of post-presid

    1) It’s not a high crime, and violates the principle of innocence of post-presidential service.
    2) It’s selective prosecution, for political ends.
    3) It’s another example of using the state for political ends.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 00:19:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641958303612764161

    Reply addressees: @bestistleftist4 @kavadajj @JJ_McCullough

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641948913535008770

  • Waiting for Trump’s Reaction. But at this point the ‘insurrection’ that never ha

    Waiting for Trump’s Reaction. But at this point the ‘insurrection’ that never happend, might just happen for real, whether Trump wants it or not. We have many unwritten laws in our system. Like all of the common law, they are traditions of wisdom. And the prohibition on political prosecution of a president after he leaves office, unless something on the order of treason or murder, is not a tradition that’s wise to break.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 01:21:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641611734438883329