Theme: Constitutional Order

  • No. The terms “republic” and “democracy” are often used interchangeably, but the

    No.

    The terms “republic” and “democracy” are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct historical and theoretical meanings. Both are forms of government where the power resides in the people, but they differ in how that power is exercised and organized. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

    Republic
    1. Representative Governance: In a republic, citizens elect representatives who make decisions on their behalf. The elected officials are accountable to the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government’s power over citizens.

    2. Constitutional Framework: Republics often have a constitution that outlines the powers and limitations of the government, providing a stable legal framework.

    3. Rule of Law: A republic places a strong emphasis on the rule of law and often includes a judicial system that is empowered to interpret the law.

    4. Checks and Balances: Republics usually have multiple branches of government (e.g., executive, legislative, judicial) with distinct powers and responsibilities, designed to prevent any single entity from gaining too much power.

    5. Indirect Democracy: While a republic is democratic in nature, it is an indirect form of democracy. Citizens have the power to elect their representatives, but they do not govern directly.

    6. Protection of Minority Rights: Republics often have mechanisms to protect the rights of minorities against the tyranny of the majority.

    Democracy
    1. Popular Rule: In a democracy, the power to make decisions lies directly with the people rather than being mediated through elected representatives.

    2. Direct Participation: In its purest form, known as direct democracy, all citizens participate in decision-making directly rather than through elected representatives.

    3. Majority Rule: Decisions in a democracy are generally made by majority vote, either directly or through elected representatives.

    4. Flexibility: Democracies can be more flexible than republics because they don’t necessarily have a formal constitution that limits the powers of the government.

    5. Simpler Structure: Democracies often have fewer governing bodies or branches, making the system less complex but potentially more susceptible to the tyranny of the majority.

    Key Difference
    Majority vs. Minority Rights: Democracies often operate on majority rule, while republics have mechanisms to protect minority rights.

    See?
    Why is it that I should have to explain these subjects to an ignorant and ideological population day after day? Because you are easily manipulated – because only about ten percent of the population can or does think. And of them the majority are male. And they usually do not include men that I am forced to educate in self defense against their ignorance.

    Reply addressees: @9898guitar @RadioTodd13


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 18:45:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706741724146515968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706739496333853181

  • THE NECESSITY AND PERPETUITY OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND WHY IT CANNOT AND WILL

    THE NECESSITY AND PERPETUITY OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND WHY IT CANNOT AND WILL NEVER CHANGE
    Just to educate you out of your ignorance. By design and for the good of all we live in a concurrent majority constitution and government, not majority constitution and government. We do not live in a democracy but a republic under concurrency and commonality. And the reason you don’t know this is that you were intentionally indoctrinated so that in your ignorance you would assist in undermining it.

    The Science of The American Constitution:

    1. NATURAL LAW: (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, tort)
    The Institution of the Natural Law
    1. The constitution, bill of rights, declaration, federalist papers, Blackstone’s commentaries, and history of the common law, the common germanic law, and the ancestral european law (west indo european)

    2. COMMONALITY: Across classes and regions in what not to do. Empiricism in discovery of prohibitions.
    The institutions of commonality:
    2. The hierarchy of courts

    3. CONCURRENCY: ACROSS CLASSES AND REGIONS in what we should do, and not a majority independent of classes and regions (tyranny of the majority). Empiricism in the discovery of agreements on the production of commons.
    The Institutions of Concurrency
    3.1. The House(proxy for the people) for concurrency in the population
    3.2. The Senate(proxy for governor) for concurrency in the states.
    3.3. The Electoral College for Concurrency of the states in the selection of the president (proxy for nobility)

    This system was designed to give the people as whole and the governors individually on behalf of the states, and the jury of the electoral college on behalf of that governor and that state, to ensure that there was the maximum competition and maxium commonality across every faction in order to continue the common law tradition that we may impose nothing that is not decided first by commonality or concurrency. In other words, the people, in regions and classes must agree.

    This entire system was designed specifically to PREVENT the horrors you seek to spread in your ignorance and arrogance.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @9898guitar @RadioTodd13


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 17:38:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706725028299984896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706678898073939991

  • BIG DYSFUNCTIONAL STATES: PROHIBITING THE COASTAL DISEASE FROM SPREADING Nitwit:

    BIG DYSFUNCTIONAL STATES: PROHIBITING THE COASTAL DISEASE FROM SPREADING
    Nitwit: “Why should North Dakota and Wyoming have more electoral power than California and New York?”

    CurtD: “To prevent the spread of horrific ideas, policy, and yes, people, from those states to others through the [ use of the ] federal government.”

    Nitwit: “What a weird way to spell “to disenfranchise as many voters as possible”

    RESPONSE
    Big Dysfunctional states are not disenfranchised. They are prohibited from disenfranchising others. Both NY and CA as well as Chicago and others, have, by violating the constitution and the law, effectively but not yet punatively seceded from the union. And the federal government is now torn by the conflict of regions as europe is torn by the conflict of latin, germanic, balto-slavic, baltic, and russian, and as the entire world by the conflict of civilizations.

    While the USA is a country (contiguous territory) it remains a federation of independent states, on the model of britain and the holy roman empire of the germanic peoples, and broader christiandom – and the federal government, meaning the concurrency of the judgment of all the other states, ensures a republican government and a minimum number of fundamental rights to members of each state.

    But within each State we are free to choose within those constraints as we may – despite what the sh—hole states of California and NY, and the other states with sh–hole cities, wish to impose upon others.

    The only ‘oddity’ so far is that we should probably require permission of a state for entry and political participation that we do for the federation itself – restoring passports for each state, and preventing the spread of contagion of irresponsibility from the sh—hole cities and states.

    And the future will include this restoration of state sovereignty and devolution of the federal government back to the states, reversing the centralization of the Civil War and world war eras.

    Thus returning the USA to its heritage, as an innovation of the Germanic civilization and the market for polities producing the competition between states, constrained by the natural common concurrent law of nature, and then constrained by the court of the church, and in the present and future constrained by the secular court of the law.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Dave_Oswald_CEO @Abusoru @RadioTodd13 @9898guitar


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 17:24:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706721353900941312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706709481344598091

  • RT @J58039716: @NotMaryAnnObv It’s not equal citizenship that is the problem. It

    RT @J58039716: @NotMaryAnnObv It’s not equal citizenship that is the problem. It’s that politics was formed by men, for men. And so it is b…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 00:28:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706465812561662142

  • Well, of course, we are under assault internally, but that is cujltural marxism

    Well, of course, we are under assault internally, but that is cujltural marxism at work, it’s nothing to do with our military, our strategic policy, our constitution, our courts, and our law.

    It has everything to do with letting women get out of control, making our government out of control, and our media out of control, and our education out of control – without updating our laws to prevent it.

    We can fix ourselves.
    The evidence is that you can’t.

    Reply addressees: @DrewRollerMusic @empireenjoyer10 @2020Blackstone


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 01:51:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706124339932811264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706101504527269899

  • Well done. Yes. This is one of the solutions we’re recommending. Also, senators

    Well done. Yes. This is one of the solutions we’re recommending.
    Also, senators should be appointed by governors again instead of directly elected. That as a tragic mistake. It separated the federal government from the states, when the entire purpose of the senate was to provide a house for governors of the states, but compensating for the fact that travel was impossible for governors, but possible for house memebers (the people).

    Reply addressees: @Chargerfryar @BasedLawyer


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 22:31:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706073836720926720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706048966301978719

  • Doesn’t appear likely unless we are forced by external events, or force ourselve

    Doesn’t appear likely unless we are forced by external events, or force ourselves by internal. We will need to devolve the federal government to the states or break up and lose the strategic value of the continent.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 17:04:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705991725473300858

    Reply addressees: @betterbuiltpool

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705976171224084939

  • Lucas I’ve just learned about you today, and begun working my way through your p

    Lucas
    I’ve just learned about you today, and begun working my way through your posts – all of which are competent and clearly communicated.

    I think Americans are all bought into ‘no more foreign wars’. I don’t think they know the consequences of letting the rules based order decay and return to world normal as the conflict of civilizations and empires.

    If you are saying we have no material interest any longer because we are resourced independent, and as disconnected from the world island of Eurasia and Africa, then that is true as well.

    To claim that American ambitions in the pre and postwar period were other than moral is a bit of a reach – just the opposite is true, and mankind has benefitted profoundly from our efforts. And the world might be a very different place if we hadn’t made those efforts.

    So the proper take is that we should have ended our project with the fall of communism – which is what drove our project – and let the world come to terms with itself. And in particular let MENA and the rest of the world work through the failure of our colonial project and the artificial borders we stuck them with.

    And those sick B——-ds of neocon expansionism, on one end and woke expansion on the other – well, I”m all in with your casting them as the criminals they are.

    But is it always the fault of the fools, or it is the fault of whose of us who know better who don’t constrain the fools?

    A little blame all around I think.

    Thank you for the work you’re doing

    -Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @Lucas_Gage_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 21:41:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705698975527976961

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705569934204420253

  • It’s easier for americans to start the reforms, and then push them into europe –

    It’s easier for americans to start the reforms, and then push them into europe – simply because there are so many of us, and more importantly, our constitution only needs minor changes because it’s scientific – unile european constitutions which are fanciful by comparison.
    Though, given the public must become angry, the rate of suffering will escalate in europe faster than the USA. So, given that these reforms require stress to act upon, even if given the rise of the right in europe because of immigration (unwanted), it’s really quite hard to predict where it will happen first.
    I mean, I didn’t forsee the degree of exasperation of the french – who are in the wost position. I”m surprised germany hasn’t had more trouble than we’ve seen.
    France always has been and remains the enemy of europe, and I’m primarily concerned that the poles and the germans take up responsibility for europe.

    Reply addressees: @RemttidAcul


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 18:19:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705648177330716672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705646073753043108

  • THE COMING MASS REVOCATION, DENATURALIZATION, AND REPATRIATION CITIZENSHIP While

    THE COMING MASS REVOCATION, DENATURALIZATION, AND REPATRIATION

    CITIZENSHIP
    While residency and citizenship have historically been two separate terms, for two separate classes. Meaning that residents are subject to via negativa legal defense, but only citizens are privilegd to participate in via positiva legislation and administration.

    Under modern mass democracy we have merged these two terms, granting everyone the franchise whether contributing to it, invested in it, responsible for maintaining it – and even granted it to those unfit for it, hostile to it, and aggressively seeking to undermine it. And worse, we have ended the use of houses of government as a market between the classes, and then worse, we have not created a house of labor or women when those classes have hostile interests to the productive, and territorial leadership classes. We have created a race to the bottom that has destroyed every attempt at democracy in history.

    So at present, Citizenship, meaning, permission to reside in a territory, being insured by the insurer of last resort – the state, contributing taxes and receiving benefits, is and always has been revokable – denaturalization into statelessness, just as defense by the people and the state has been revokable – a designation of outlaw.

    REVOKATION
    Historically, we removed the muslims from spain. We removed the jews repeatedly from most countries. We deported one another en masse during the era of nation state formation. All governments have relocated hostile, problematic, unfit, people around the world throughout history. More recently, the Dominicans revoked citizenship and removed the Hatians. We have departed kingdoms and territories (not countries) we had colonized, after forming them into countries.

    CRISIS
    It is almost absolutely positively certain that this process will repeat as soon as the anglo american unification of the planet during the age of sail, the industrial revolution, and the world wars that ended the age of agrarian empires – attempting to usher in the modern age of nation states, and the rules based interanational order that’s dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty and disease. That order should have ended in 92, instad of celebrating the false victory and claims of end of history. Instead the enemy pulled out all the stops starting with the obama presidency, his invitation of a very selct and biased group of economists to the white house, and by doing nothing at all to prevent the rise of opposition abroad, while encouraging it at home – just as his church of hatred of white civilization had preached. He followed their scripture.

    The age of debt expansion ends with the age of population expansion. The age of hyperconsumption and redistribution ends at the same time. And with it the tolerance for those unfit for western civilization and it’s institutions of ‘whiteness’ – a term which is a hostile slur for our civilization’s institutions and traditions that indoctrinate and require each person bear the maximum possible responsiblity for both private and common – thus forcing all of us to insure everything in the high trust civilization or be deprived of our rights within it.

    PREDICTIONS
    I have an enviable record of prediction, and it’s not as if the movement we began in the early nineties, escalating in the early oughts, is other than expanding rapidly in the public consciousness as our experiment with the pretense of the end of scarcity and equality between sexes classes and peoples continues to hit the wall of the exhaustion of the few economic generations of temporarhy privilege created by industrialization and the anglo american unification of the world in trade – ending the age of agrarian empires and their monopoly on trade and trade routes.

    I have had a very difficult time with prediction over the past few years as acceleration and crisis drowns the data in noise impossible to peer through. I was very far off with China, who, I didn’t believe could survive this long. I was too optimistic about russia and had greater confidence that we would finally unite rusian resources with german technology – mostly so that Russia, demographically, and economically, could simply survive.

    I had expected a narrow Hillary election victory – and an administration fully completing the transformation to political Leninism (Hillary’s a Leninist are are most Democrats today) to cause a revolution that would spiral – and it was the proper timing for it to occur with the least harm – well before we encounter the 2025-2030(5?) coincidence of cycles that will without question create some sort of catastrophic reorganization.

    While Trump was correct on his international and economic policy (as well as immigration) and correctly restructured geostrategy and sought to repatriate and restore the american working and middle classes, (and while he was clearly not expecting to win, or he would have spent a year putting together a team willing to push through policy), he actually took wind out of the sails of the fomenting revolution, and caused the radical left and their allies in the democratic party, credentialist (deep) state, academy, and media, to double down an accelerate with the activist terrorism of BLM and Antifa. But covid gave them the excuse to destroy the economy and end trump’s achievement. Which, as I predicted and tried (at personal harm) to popularize and defend against, they then used to suppress all public political discourse as thorougly as the soviets then and the Chinese now. Again, label it as you want, but in technical terms it’s Leninism.

    So, while it takes a greate deal of general knowledge to predict long term trends and the intersection of cycles, it’s impossible to predict timing – almost entirely because it’s impossible to judge the rate of adaptation of the population to the circumstances at hand to the deterministic outcome that they’re heading into against their wishes or their understanding – and their overwhelming desire to bury heads in the sand instead.

    So since there are so many of us in the business of predicting these cycles now that for those of us with knowledge of the subject, our date ranges are converging.

    And some should take comfort in that we are, at least the anglosphere is, as naval rather than ‘world island’ powers, most insulated from the coming crisis. And in america we will profit from it.

    That said we will ether devolve as I have recommended and worked toward, into a federation that the founders intended, with common rule of law between states, and minimum rights within, yet total local control over social economic and cultural life – or we will war untili more than ten million – maybe many more – are dead. And while that is happening all the pent up wants and fantasies of those less moral than we, will be expressed as wars of aggression and predation upon one another, and the world costs of everything will reach levels that cause starvation to return as certainly and as thorougly as the black plague.

    So you know, I kinda want to fix this problem peacefully before any of that has a chance to happen.

    And we can’t do it until the public needs far less of a lever to motivate them to understand and willingly accept the necessary change” that the usa isn’t and never was a country, but a federation of countries, (states), agreeing to the same terms, so that we could capture this contient for our mutual gain despite our differences in wants and needs and ambitions.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 18:05:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705644507084050432