Theme: Constitutional Order

  • THE GREAT ERROR AND THE GREAT LIE TO COMPENSATE FOR IT. (important piece) (solut

    THE GREAT ERROR AND THE GREAT LIE TO COMPENSATE FOR IT.

    (important piece) (solutions) (historical context)

    America was designed to restore and preserve the Anglo Saxon rights of Englishman, for Englishman and the occasional Scot.

    The constitution is an English document articulating English rights, for English men and their families, justified as necessary using Natural Law thought beneficial for all men.

    The source of the declaration constitution and bill of rights was English, Anglo Saxon, Norman, Germanic, Indo-European traditional common law.

    Everyone else is a free rider.

    The constitution is not a living document open to interpretation but the most modern articulation in law of that ancient aristocratic egalitarian tradition, designed to require strict construction, by formal operations, and near universal assent in order to implement change. It is the most conservative document ever written, depriving the government, the court, and the people of the ability to infringe upon those ancient rights.

    The error in Britain and then in the states, was the failure to see government not as a constructor of law, but as a market for the contractual construction of commons between the classes, holding different abilities, knowledge and interests.

    And that as the franchise expanded with economic and military participation, the British and Americans failed to add new “houses” for the new states, colonies, classes and genders.

    All political, moral, ethical and legal philosophy since the revolutionary period has consisted entirely of a series of convenient lies, justifications, and errors by which to compensate for the failure to extend the classical liberal model to allow citizens to construct a market for contractual commons, maintain separation of law and contract creation, and to convert from ascent by majority rule to dissent via suit in court of law by universal standing.

    But the progressive lies are just that. Lies. The constitution is the most strictly constructed, empirically demanding, operationally articulated document in history.

    And progressives have sought to destroy it for the better part of two centuries while lauding the power the errors of the British and Americans granted them to do so.

    This is the greatest legal deception in human history third only to the forcible introduction of Christianity, and the universal deceit of scriptural monotheism.

    Perhaps I should claim Propertarianism was written in metal tablets buried in the ground or handed to me in a burning bush or visited to me in my dreams, rather than the product oaf a life-long search to the problem of political and ethical conflict that has plagued us since 1960.

    But no. That would be a violation of those ancient traditions: speak the truth even if it means your death.

    All else follows from that expensive payment in exchange for reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 04:39:00 UTC

  • Truth is Enough to save us. The common law is enough of an institution. Our hist

    Truth is Enough to save us. The common law is enough of an institution. Our history is enough for myth – and its true.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 01:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629094537269497856

    Reply addressees: @AliceTeller

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628728169890058240


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AliceTeller

    It is easy to mock images from castles to anime but we need myths that uplift or we are left to stare at the gutter and call it clean.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628728169890058240

  • Land, Air, Water, Infrastructure, and Information. We can protect these commons

    Land, Air, Water, Infrastructure, and Information. We can protect these commons with universal standing under the common law. #NRx #tcot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 16:49:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628971092229652480

  • The founders captured Natural Law (property) but lacked current knowledge by whi

    The founders captured Natural Law (property) but lacked current knowledge by which to require strict construction of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 07:15:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628826739687485440

    Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628820677903036420


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628820677903036420

  • Which constitution? The one with the second amendment and the fourteenth, or the

    Which constitution? The one with the second amendment and the fourteenth, or the one without them?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 06:05:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628809018853736448

    Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628606475573661696


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628606475573661696

  • Would love to know your take on this – Magna Carta – the Ugly Truth

    Would love to know your take on this – Magna Carta – the Ugly Truth:


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 11:37:00 UTC

  • Under Rule of Law, governments cannot make law, only contracts within the law. A

    Under Rule of Law, governments cannot make law, only contracts within the law. All else is not Law, but dictate (command). #tlot #tcot #NRx


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:39:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627790721727262720

  • Classical Contractualism and Rule of Law

    (law) (definitions) (learning propertariansim) [O]liver Wendel Holms really screwed American and anglo law. The more I study American history the more obvious it becomes that without the many nearby competitors we had faced as Europeans in Europe, that the new continent provided an excuse for the conquerors to take license with the law given the unanimity of sentiment: seizure of the opportunity to profit from the conquest of the continent. A unanimity that was not present in Europe (and which is only present under empire.) Law consists of the one rule necessary to preserve cooperation: the prohibition on parasitism that causes cooperation to be a rational preference.  And by causing cooperation to be a rational preference, we create and preserve the disproportionate rewards of cooperation, and the disproportionate rewards of the division of labor and knowledge in that is possible under cooperation. The one rule of prohibition on parasitism includes all forms of parasitism: violence, theft, extortion, fraud, externality and conspiracy. 

    Parasitism must be performed against something: Life, Mates and Offspring, Relations, Property,  Shareholder Property, Informal Institutional Property, and Formal Institutional Property. And we must know how NOT to perform parasitism: by limiting our actions to Productive, fully informed,  warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of parasitism by the same criteria. And we must agree to enforce this requirement in fulfillment of the prohibition on parasitism, by providing insurance to one another consisting of both the Obverse: we will provide a means of retaliation against violations of the rule; and Reverse: we will not retaliate against  retaliations that are performed against a violation of the rule. To provide means of insurance by providing an organizational means of retaliation against violations of the one rule, we will construct a court (testimony), a jury, presided by one or more judges. To simplify the act of determining whether violations have or have not occurred, we will record our decisions as the obverse: property rights, and the reverse: prohibitions on violations of those rights. THE EVOLUTION OF NON-LAW FROM LAW 1) LEGAL SCIENTISM (SCIENTIFIC) or CLASSICAL LEGAL THEORY Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated (true). As such, law is if not a science, at least a formal logic, that is both internally consistent, externally correspondent and universally decidable. Political preference cannot override these principles. (Rule of Law) 2) LEGAL REALISM (RATIONAL) – THE FIRST AMERICAN VIOLATION OF RULE OF LAW Law is constructed from both political and logical origins. 3) LEGAL POSITIVISM (ARATIONAL) – THE SECOND AMERICAN VIOLATION AND THE TOTAL ABANDONMENT OF RULE OF LAW Law is a social construction unbound by any constraint other than its origin. REFORMATION: LEGAL SCIENTIFIC CONTRACTUALISM (RATIO-SCIENTIFIC) Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated, since such violation whether singular grand and visible, or invisibly accumulated from multitudinous and minor errors, would violate and destroy the incentive to cooperate within a government by rule of law. However, nearly any desirable contract can be constructed by voluntary agreement of parties, so long as the internal transfers are enumerated and the net result is productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of external imposition of costs upon others. PROPERTARIANISM = LEGAL CONTRACTUALISM = CLASSICAL LAW See Also: “The First Principles of Propertarian Ethics” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine, (Tallinn, Estonia)
  • Classical Contractualism and Rule of Law

    (law) (definitions) (learning propertariansim) [O]liver Wendel Holms really screwed American and anglo law. The more I study American history the more obvious it becomes that without the many nearby competitors we had faced as Europeans in Europe, that the new continent provided an excuse for the conquerors to take license with the law given the unanimity of sentiment: seizure of the opportunity to profit from the conquest of the continent. A unanimity that was not present in Europe (and which is only present under empire.) Law consists of the one rule necessary to preserve cooperation: the prohibition on parasitism that causes cooperation to be a rational preference.  And by causing cooperation to be a rational preference, we create and preserve the disproportionate rewards of cooperation, and the disproportionate rewards of the division of labor and knowledge in that is possible under cooperation. The one rule of prohibition on parasitism includes all forms of parasitism: violence, theft, extortion, fraud, externality and conspiracy. 

    Parasitism must be performed against something: Life, Mates and Offspring, Relations, Property,  Shareholder Property, Informal Institutional Property, and Formal Institutional Property. And we must know how NOT to perform parasitism: by limiting our actions to Productive, fully informed,  warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of parasitism by the same criteria. And we must agree to enforce this requirement in fulfillment of the prohibition on parasitism, by providing insurance to one another consisting of both the Obverse: we will provide a means of retaliation against violations of the rule; and Reverse: we will not retaliate against  retaliations that are performed against a violation of the rule. To provide means of insurance by providing an organizational means of retaliation against violations of the one rule, we will construct a court (testimony), a jury, presided by one or more judges. To simplify the act of determining whether violations have or have not occurred, we will record our decisions as the obverse: property rights, and the reverse: prohibitions on violations of those rights. THE EVOLUTION OF NON-LAW FROM LAW 1) LEGAL SCIENTISM (SCIENTIFIC) or CLASSICAL LEGAL THEORY Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated (true). As such, law is if not a science, at least a formal logic, that is both internally consistent, externally correspondent and universally decidable. Political preference cannot override these principles. (Rule of Law) 2) LEGAL REALISM (RATIONAL) – THE FIRST AMERICAN VIOLATION OF RULE OF LAW Law is constructed from both political and logical origins. 3) LEGAL POSITIVISM (ARATIONAL) – THE SECOND AMERICAN VIOLATION AND THE TOTAL ABANDONMENT OF RULE OF LAW Law is a social construction unbound by any constraint other than its origin. REFORMATION: LEGAL SCIENTIFIC CONTRACTUALISM (RATIO-SCIENTIFIC) Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated, since such violation whether singular grand and visible, or invisibly accumulated from multitudinous and minor errors, would violate and destroy the incentive to cooperate within a government by rule of law. However, nearly any desirable contract can be constructed by voluntary agreement of parties, so long as the internal transfers are enumerated and the net result is productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of external imposition of costs upon others. PROPERTARIANISM = LEGAL CONTRACTUALISM = CLASSICAL LAW See Also: “The First Principles of Propertarian Ethics” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine, (Tallinn, Estonia)
  • PROPERTARIANISM AND RULE OF LAW: CONTRACTUALISM Oliver Wendel Holms really screw

    PROPERTARIANISM AND RULE OF LAW: CONTRACTUALISM

    Oliver Wendel Holms really screwed American and anglo law.

    The more I study American history the more obvious it becomes that without the many nearby competitors we had faced as Europeans in Europe, that the new continent provided an excuse for the conquerors to take license given the unanimity of sentiment. A unanimity that was not present in Europe (and which is only present under empire.)

    LEGAL SCIENTISM (SCIENTIFIC)

    Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated (true). As such, law is if not a science, at least a formal logic, that is both internally consistent, externally correspondent and universally decidable. Political preference cannot override these principles. (Rule of Law)

    LEGAL REALISM (RATIONAL) – THE FIRST AMERICAN VIOLATION OF RULE OF LAW

    Law is constructed from both political and logical origins.

    LEGAL POSITIVISM (ARATIONAL) – THE SECOND AMERICAN VIOLATION AND THE TOTAL ABANDONMENT OF RULE OF LAW

    Law is a social construction unbound by any constraint other than its origin.

    REFORMATION: LEGAL SCIENTIFIC CONTRACTUALISM (RATIO-SCIENTIFIC)

    Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated, since such violation whether singular grand and visible, or invisibly accumulated from multitudinous and minor errors, would violate and destroy the incentive to cooperate within a government by rule of law. However, nearly any desirable contract can be constructed by voluntary agreement of parties, so long as the internal transfers are enumerated and the net result is productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of external imposition of costs upon others.

    PROPERTARIANISM = LEGAL CONTRACTUALISM

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine, (Tallinn, Estonia)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-01 04:59:00 UTC