Dude if you want to live in a communist(anarchic), socialist(authoritarian), redistributivist(center-left), commons-ist (conservative), libertarian (aristocratic), anarchic (diasporic) polity, then I am in total support of YOUR desires as long as you are in equal support of MY desires. But I will tell you that in the end, the first three will suffer because the talent will flee to the second three.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 13:24:00 UTC
THE POSITIVE AND JUSTIFICATIONARY LAW OF TYRANNY AND COMMAND VS THE NEGATIVE AND CRITICAL LAW OF LIBERTY AND INNOVATION.
+THE POSITIVE LAW
The Soviet Law was not law at all but ideological command, from the superior to the inferior – and dramatically counter to the behavior of human beings.
The Chinese ‘law’ is not law at all, but ‘moral’ command, from the superior to the inferior, with the unstated purpose of maintaining Han control of the territory and people.
The Continental Law (the french and germans) separates the law of citizens and the law of government. It is a law of unequals. It is a law of nationalism.
The english constitution treats all men as unequal and entirely empirical, in an attempt to constrain the discretion of the king and government.
The american common law, treats all men as equal – it is a law for aristocratic egalitarians, it states only what may not be done.
Propertarianism (my work) separates Natural Law of all men, from contracts for the commons, which may not transgress natural law. It is a law for preventing the political and legal inequality of men.
-THE NEGATIVE LAW
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 04:16:00 UTC
EVOLUTION STARE DECISIS (PRECEDENT) AND THE COMMON LAW VS STRICT CONSTRUCTION.
(important concept)
The common law (customary law between competing courts) relies upon Precedent rather than strict construction from first principles.
The fact that westerners practiced non-parasitism and the oath, meant that by consequence, the common law evolved to REFLECT empirical and natural law, as much as cause and perpetuate it.
But into the colonial era, then the industrial era, under the strain of complexity and scale,
We start out as hunter-agrarian tribes, where consensus can be formed and headmen decide disputes, to agrarian urbanism under either despotism, or democracy, where majorities decide and judges resolve disputes according to tradition, to industrial division of labor under either bureaucratic despotism, or multi-house democracy creating a market for commons between the classes reliant on assent, and layers of courts that resolve disputes according to legislation, to the present information era, where we will have corporate-state despotism, or multiple houses creating a market for commons limited only by legal dissent, and a market for courts that resolve disputes by appeal to strict construction under natural law.
In other words, ***as we scale in population and productive complexity we increasingly transform from the use of consensus and justification of small groups of common interest, to the use of a market to calculate common interest and criticism between groups.***
We move from majority voluntary assent to minority legal dissent.
We move incrementally from justification to criticism: from democratic proof to natural law falsification.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 02:07:00 UTC
PROFOUND.
ANGLO=GERMAN < 1840. ANGLO != GERMAN > 1880
1) Jefferson was the first CONSTITUTIONALIST (USING: LAW/FORCE) An Aristocrat. (Protestant)
2) Burke was the first CONSERVATIVE (USING: MORALITY/GOSSIP) The Upper Middle Class (Tilting Catholic)
3) Disraeli was the first NEOCON (USING: COMMERCE/REMUNERATION) The Middle Class (Tilting Jew)
This in itself is a profound statement about the devolution of western civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 06:45:00 UTC
#NewRight: If the left can destroy rule of law to implement their lies, we can restore law to implement truthfulness. Constitution=Science.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-06 06:34:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/728473068956307456
TWEETS TO WILLIAM KRISTOL Possessing Courage is not the same as possessing solutions. Conservatism and universal equal enfranchisement are incompatible. Sentiments do not arguments make. Beliefs not policy make. Moralizing not philosophy make. Counter-signaling is but weakness. Conservatism is counter to the strategy of the mass. Why? It is personally costly, meritocratic, deterministically eugenic. And because it is costly, meritocratic, deterministically eugenic, conservatives cannot truthfully advocate for it’s methods. Ergo, under democracy, conservatives lied by omission.Since truth is the source of conservatism, it could not survive. So our generation puts truth back on the table as the first cause of western success. End the 20th Century of Lies. #NewRight If democracy and movement conservatism are incompatible with truth telling, THEY CANNOT BE WESTERN VALUES. #NewRight Natural Law: Truth Telling, Testimony, Jury, Common Law, Property, Family, Sovereignty, Merit, Aristocracy, Commons,Technology. Conservatives failed because they could not find a ratio- scientific argument for the dissonance between democracy and merit. Man is not moral or immoral, but rational. It is only that morality is a better investment for most. But Parasitism is rational And democracy is a vehicle for incremental recidivism from individual moral meritocracy to collective immoral parasitism. We are the #NewRight.Because we will end the century of lies. End the myth of democracy.End the myth of equality. No more lies. Conservatism = Aristocracy (Meritocracy). One must EARN the franchise through demonstrated achievements. #NewRight
TWEETS TO WILLIAM KRISTOL Possessing Courage is not the same as possessing solutions. Conservatism and universal equal enfranchisement are incompatible. Sentiments do not arguments make. Beliefs not policy make. Moralizing not philosophy make. Counter-signaling is but weakness. Conservatism is counter to the strategy of the mass. Why? It is personally costly, meritocratic, deterministically eugenic. And because it is costly, meritocratic, deterministically eugenic, conservatives cannot truthfully advocate for it’s methods. Ergo, under democracy, conservatives lied by omission.Since truth is the source of conservatism, it could not survive. So our generation puts truth back on the table as the first cause of western success. End the 20th Century of Lies. #NewRight If democracy and movement conservatism are incompatible with truth telling, THEY CANNOT BE WESTERN VALUES. #NewRight Natural Law: Truth Telling, Testimony, Jury, Common Law, Property, Family, Sovereignty, Merit, Aristocracy, Commons,Technology. Conservatives failed because they could not find a ratio- scientific argument for the dissonance between democracy and merit. Man is not moral or immoral, but rational. It is only that morality is a better investment for most. But Parasitism is rational And democracy is a vehicle for incremental recidivism from individual moral meritocracy to collective immoral parasitism. We are the #NewRight.Because we will end the century of lies. End the myth of democracy.End the myth of equality. No more lies. Conservatism = Aristocracy (Meritocracy). One must EARN the franchise through demonstrated achievements. #NewRight
#NewRight: If the left can destroy rule of law to implement their lies, we can restore law to implement truthfulness. Constitution=Science.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-06 02:34:00 UTC
You’re right. It sounds silly. So when you’re on trial for something I hope you can count on jurors to ‘feel it’. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-30 16:51:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726454023742722048
Reply addressees: @iamz3ro
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726453555058462720
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726453555058462720
How do you create a minimal state? You don’t. You eliminate demand for authority with common law and market for commons.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-29 20:01:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726139239272992769