Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Definitions: Aristocracy vs Oligarchy

    Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY —“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch). You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort. It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group). It is much harder to kill a government (larger group) it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group ) An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of: – Force – Gossip – Capital The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities. Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity. In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.

  • Definitions: Aristocracy vs Oligarchy

    Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY —“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch). You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort. It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group). It is much harder to kill a government (larger group) it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group ) An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of: – Force – Gossip – Capital The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities. Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity. In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.

  • THE DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION OF INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION Little did they know what

    THE DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION OF INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION

    Little did they know what they were doing. But by removing the duel, libel, slander, and falsehood from the common law, the state eliminated warranty (skin in the game). And by the elimination of warranty under the law, converted a moral imperative captured in common law, to a moral imperative discarded in exchange for market profits.

    It was the elimination of duel, libel, slander, and falsehood under the assumption of a naturally moral man, and the catastrophe of free speech that made possible the war against the west: judaic cosmopolitanism, puritan postmodernism, french pseudoscientific moralism, and german pseudo-rationalism.

    THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BUREAUCRACY: DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION AND LOSS OF WARRANTY (SKIN IN THE GAME)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 17:18:00 UTC

  • If Regional Monarchy creates positive incentives for the accumulation of interge

    If Regional Monarchy creates positive incentives for the accumulation of intergenerational capital. (Judge of last resort)

    If Territorial Nobility creates the positive incentives for the accumulation of capital. (Territorial Judge of Last Resort)

    If Aristocratic Family creates the positive incentives for the accumulation of intergenerational capital (Genetic Judge)

    If Sovereign Individual creates the positive incentive for the accumulation of capital. (Productive Judge)

    If Kinship creates the positive incentive for the accumulation of capital and the redistribution of capital to kin….

    Then kinship rule is simply the means by which we accumulate quality capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 14:25:00 UTC

  • Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY —“What are the features that distinguish aristoc

    Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY

    —“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman

    An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch).

    You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort.

    It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group).

    It is much harder to kill a government (larger group)

    it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group )

    An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of:

    – Force

    – Gossip

    – Capital

    The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities.

    Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity.

    In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 14:34:00 UTC

  • There is a great difference between establishing a religion and banning a religi

    There is a great difference between establishing a religion and banning a religion. There is no reason we do not ban religions – frequently.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 18:20:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799316384022982656

  • There is a great difference between establishing a religion and banning a religi

    There is a great difference between establishing a religion and banning a religion. There is no reason we do not ban religions – frequently.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:20:00 UTC

  • Sorry but if your religion isn’t compatible with natural law, then it’s not comp

    Sorry but if your religion isn’t compatible with natural law, then it’s not compatible with rule of law, and not compatible with the west.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:19:00 UTC

  • Democracy created the age of monopoly rule, where the west had forever suppresse

    Democracy created the age of monopoly rule, where the west had forever suppressed it. Houses of government created a market, not monopoly.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 17:36:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798580529151012865

  • THE NARRATIVE 0) end of the conquest of the continent 1) the only value of scale

    THE NARRATIVE

    0) end of the conquest of the continent

    1) the only value of scale is war at the cost of innovation

    2) self-determination and innovation

    3) devolution or secession or ghettos, or civil war.

    4) preservation of federal insurer of last resort

    5) defense of the informational commons from falsehood and fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 09:08:00 UTC