Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • ANY LAW THAT IS OPEN TO INTERPRETATION LICENSES INTERPRETATIONS (the koran licen

    ANY LAW THAT IS OPEN TO INTERPRETATION LICENSES INTERPRETATIONS

    (the koran licenses terrorists)

    Christians and Jews went through the enlightenment and the reformation, and the legal and scientific revolutions. The evil in the west has been caused by the re-introduction of abrahamism (christianity, judaism, and islam) in the forms of Jewish Marxism, and French Postmodernism, and less so by Anglo Egalitarianism. And now we’re dealing with the only people who have failed to go through the enlightenment, and historicize, rationalize, and legalize their customs.

    So the point I’m making is that if you DON’T convert the Koran into uninterpretable (Decidable) propositions, then DE FACTO, all interpretation of the Koran IS IN FACT licensed by the Book, the religion, and all muslims.

    In other words, the jihadis and terrorists are in fact practicing Islam because it is possible to interpret islam from the book as such, because the inability to interpret islam in that way is not restated in a new version of the Book.

    And my argument is, that if it was restated, then it would be untenable for western authors.

    Which is why I suspect western authors will, as some of them have begun to, state the Koran in legal verse.

    We know that the book is a fabrication just as was the Jewish Bible, and the Christian Bible. We know the Koran was only Codified a century ago. We have begun producing an historical literature demonstrating that Mohammed is no more real a character than Jesus, Arthur, or Siegfried.

    We have not however converted it to a set of statements of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 12:16:00 UTC

  • WHY HAS THE KORAN NOT BEEN CONVERTED INTO HISTORICAL AND LEGAL VERSE – TESTABLE

    WHY HAS THE KORAN NOT BEEN CONVERTED INTO HISTORICAL AND LEGAL VERSE – TESTABLE STATEMENTS NOT OPEN TO INTERPRETATION?

    If the Koran can be converted to law – a sequence of operationally testable statements, as has all of christendom then why has it not been?

    If the koran can be converted into law so that it cannot be interpreted, why has it not been? To preserve interpretation rather than decidability?

    If the koran can be interpreted, then how can anyone claim it is law?

    Laws are decidable. Opinions are not. Until you can reduce literature to laws that are decidable, then one has no claim other than that all DEDUCTIONS FROM IT are in fact REPRESENTATIVE OF IT.

    In other words, if you can’t DECIDE because of operationally testable statements, then the DECISION is to leave open interpretation. Therefore the decision is to leave open interpretation, and justification of it is just making excuses for licensing interpretation.

    Therefore all actions derived from interpretation are the result of the decision NOT to eradicate interpretation.

    In other words, jihadists, in all their flavors, and islamists in all their flavors, are specifically licensed by all other muslims because they have not DENIED them the ability to interpret the Koran, by stating the Koran in decidable verse: a sequence of operationally testable statements.

    In other words, muslims accommodate terrorist ideologies by not regulating their religion such that it is FREE of terrorist ideologies.

    Jews and Christians have both historicized and legalized their literature. Islam has NOT historicized and legalized its literature, and resists it at every opportunity.

    With every denial we see only confirmation: islam licenses jihadis, terrorism, and interpretation.

    The truth is,that the Koran *CAN* be converted into law.

    At which point it will be untenable.

    Which is why it has not been done.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 11:41:00 UTC

  • LITERATURE AND LAW ARE ENOUGH: (DEVOTEES OF THE CULTS OF IDEALISM, SUPERNATURALI

    LITERATURE AND LAW ARE ENOUGH: (DEVOTEES OF THE CULTS OF IDEALISM, SUPERNATURALISM AND SUPERNORMALISM.)

    The via positiva myth and literature, via negativa law.

    You want to achieve good, and I want to achieve the eradication of the false and the bad.

    You want to achieve consensus on the good, and I want to eliminate consensus on the false and the bad, by providing incentives to prosecute the false and the bad, even if some well meaning fools think it is a good.

    You want to find a means of education, and I want to find a means of conflict resolution.

    You want to find a means of INDOCTRINATION of a monopoly and I want to find a means of REGULATION a market, without the need for indoctrination, so that people can develop whatever good and true narratives they desire, as long as they are not bad.

    You want to do something expensive: education, and I want to do something cheap: law.

    You want to do something that provides people with opportunities, and I want to do something that deprives them of opportunities.

    You want something that you can convince people of, and I want something that they needn’t be.

    Science (measurement and decidability) can only exist as a via-negativa process (eliminating of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit), but it requires a great deal of knowledge to employ – principally because it is impossible to attach values to statements.

    While it is something quite different to teach and rally, and much easier to rely upon fictionalisms, idealisms, myths, narratives, that contain more experiential information so that values can be attached to statements.

    In other words, it is very hard to load, frame, and suggest using science and law, and it is very easy to load, frame, and suggest using narratives.

    And my position is, that if we deny people fictionalisms and idealisms, that have sufficient Supernormalism in myth, heroes, and histories, that the lies of Supernaturalism, Idealism, conflationism, need not be employed in education and communication, any more than they need be employed in any other aspect of life.

    Or at least, those ‘techniques’ produce externalities that are demonstrably harmful as hell, and that such people employing such techniques may have no dominion over others in the construction of commons, legislation, and law.

    Ying and Yang was a prison. Good and Evil a prison. Deflationary Truth and Falsehood the method of transcendence.

    And as far as I know, Literature and Law are all that is necessary for pedagogy. It is that people who have learned to ‘lie’ by idealism and supernaturalism are unable to exit the programming of the cults just as those who argue by theological means are unable to exit the programming of the cult.

    We can exit falsehood. Literature and history make no claims of the ideal the supernatural, albeit they educate us through supernormalism (hyperbole).

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:55:00 UTC

  • #Trump You will either drain The Swamp, and restore the Natural Law of Sovereign

    #Trump You will either drain The Swamp, and restore the Natural Law of Sovereign Men to the Constitution,or we will end this empire forever.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 12:53:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872436282626117632

  • THERE ARE NO GOOD COPS. THE POLICE ARE AN ARMY OF OCCUPATION We need only consid

    THERE ARE NO GOOD COPS. THE POLICE ARE AN ARMY OF OCCUPATION

    We need only consider the following:

    •A cop’s job is to enforce the laws, all of them;

    •Many of the laws are manifestly unjust, and some are even cruel and wicked;

    •Therefore every cop has to agree to act as an enforcer for laws that are manifestly unjust or even cruel and wicked.

    There are no good cops. – Robert Higgs

    (via a friend)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 12:01:00 UTC

  • #Trump We shall have our sovereignty, natural law, family, kin, nation, and civi

    #Trump We shall have our sovereignty, natural law, family, kin, nation, and civilization back, or there will be nothing left to have for any

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 09:06:00 UTC

  • #Trump You will either drain The Swamp, and restore the Natural Law of Sovereign

    #Trump You will either drain The Swamp, and restore the Natural Law of Sovereign Men to the Constitution,or we will end this empire forever.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 08:53:00 UTC

  • Rule of Law, under Natural Law, meaning ‘The US Constitution’ is an extremist id

    Rule of Law, under Natural Law, meaning ‘The US Constitution’ is an extremist ideology? Go Home. You’re an opponent of Rule of Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-04 18:17:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/871430797315768321

    Reply addressees: @NipunSeri @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/871429311978450945

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NipunSeri

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump We need to be more worried about these people with extremist ideology

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/871429311978450945

  • THE CONDUCT OF A REVOLUTION 0) Socialize strategy, prepare portfolio of action p

    THE CONDUCT OF A REVOLUTION

    0) Socialize strategy, prepare portfolio of action plans, distribute literature, options for cessation, new constitution and demands.

    1) Issue demand for Military Rule, and Restoration of Natural Law

    2) Launch independent movements to overwhelm police and emergency, and infrastructure (no I’m not giving away those tactics yet.) Some of these terms will be vicious. Most will serve the purpose of accumulating assets, supply lines, and routes.

    3) Bait BLM/Antifa, and every other activist (increase radius of agitation)

    4) They will call In the National Guard. Exhaust Them. Infiltrate them. Convert them. And most of all, never let them sleep, eat, or travel safely.

    5) Encourage external forces exert pressure on the empire. (no I’m not giving away that strategy yet)

    6) Continuously Repeat Demands for Restoration of Natural Law (constitution). Kill defectors or compromisers.

    7) Accept any of the options:

    …. a) Restore and harden constitution of natural law applying to all states without exception, and therefore organized secession by those willing (ca, ny, nj) – by county.

    …. b) Retain federal military and treasury and insurer of last resort. Dissolve remaining federal institutions immediately. Then secession and reconstitution *by county* into new states and regions.

    …. d) Destruction of the federal government in its entirety and a return of all assets and control to the states, who are then free to constitute new regions independent of agreed upon means of dissolution and reformation.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 13:31:00 UTC

  • AMERICAN ‘NEVER AGAIN’ We must never have another presidential election. We must

    AMERICAN ‘NEVER AGAIN’

    We must never have another presidential election. We must restore natural law and extend protection of goods and services to information, by extending the demand for due diligence. Our revolution will take place in one of the next two election cycles. The sooner the better, and the more violent and decisive the better.

    (We will the nationalize FB/Google and end the game.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 11:28:00 UTC