Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • 1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rat

    1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 18:15:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948981108036849666

    Reply addressees: @KyleHen44723716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176

    IN REPLY TO:

    @KyleHen44723716

    @curtdoolittle A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176

  • Sovereignty is only possible under organized violence, Rule of Law is only possi

    Sovereignty is only possible under organized violence, Rule of Law is only possible under organized violence, Liberty is only possible under Rule of Law. Prosperity – the rate of trade – is determined by the scope of Rule of Law. EITHER FIGHT OR LOSE.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-03 16:13:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948588090641219591

    Reply addressees: @zwyrw @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948574770383282177

    IN REPLY TO:

    @zwyrw

    @curtdoolittle @TOOEdit We could undercut and neutralize the best weapon of our enemy: social stigma and threat of loss of job and family, social circle.
    By organising networks for Whites wherein they elevate their quality of life and gain more social status and rewards. Strictly non-activist.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948574770383282177

  • ILLEGAL, NOT ILLEGAL, AND LEGAL. (Friend reminds me this is beneath my purview.

    ILLEGAL, NOT ILLEGAL, AND LEGAL.

    (Friend reminds me this is beneath my purview. This post is not about weed, but about markets and the scope of permissible behavior under law.)

    A Post on ‘weed’ reminded me to make an important point:

    We do not choose between ILLEGAL, and LEGAL …

    … but between:

    ILLEGAL, NOT-ILLEGAL, and LEGAL:

    SEQUENCE:

    0 – Bearable but not Usable ( Grandfathered )

    1 – Usable but not producible ( Personal )

    2 – Producible but not exchangeable, (Private)

    3 – Exchangeable but not commercial, (Hobby Market)

    4 – Commercial but not industrial, (Craft Market)

    5 – Industrial but regulated, (Commercial Market)

    6 – Industrial but unregulated (Almost Never).

    IMO ‘weed’ should have been made not-illegal in Private and Commons but not in Markets. In other words, producible, exchangeable, but not marketable. Commercialization was a mistake. And it was (measurably) unnecessary.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-02 16:33:00 UTC

  • Illegal, Not Illegal, And Legal.

    (Friend reminds me this is beneath my purview. This post is not about weed, but about markets and the scope of permissible behavior under law.) A Post on ‘weed’ reminded me to make an important point: We do not choose between ILLEGAL, and LEGAL … … but between: ILLEGAL, NOT-ILLEGAL, and LEGAL: SEQUENCE: 0 – Bearable but not Usable ( Grandfathered ) 1 – Usable but not producible ( Personal ) 2 – Producible but not exchangeable, (Private) 3 – Exchangeable but not commercial, (Hobby Market) 4 – Commercial but not industrial, (Craft Market) 5 – Industrial but regulated, (Commercial Market) 6 – Industrial but unregulated (Almost Never). IMO ‘weed’ should have been made not-illegal in Private and Commons but not in Markets. In other words, producible, exchangeable, but not marketable. Commercialization was a mistake. And it was (measurably) unnecessary.

  • Illegal, Not Illegal, And Legal.

    (Friend reminds me this is beneath my purview. This post is not about weed, but about markets and the scope of permissible behavior under law.) A Post on ‘weed’ reminded me to make an important point: We do not choose between ILLEGAL, and LEGAL … … but between: ILLEGAL, NOT-ILLEGAL, and LEGAL: SEQUENCE: 0 – Bearable but not Usable ( Grandfathered ) 1 – Usable but not producible ( Personal ) 2 – Producible but not exchangeable, (Private) 3 – Exchangeable but not commercial, (Hobby Market) 4 – Commercial but not industrial, (Craft Market) 5 – Industrial but regulated, (Commercial Market) 6 – Industrial but unregulated (Almost Never). IMO ‘weed’ should have been made not-illegal in Private and Commons but not in Markets. In other words, producible, exchangeable, but not marketable. Commercialization was a mistake. And it was (measurably) unnecessary.

  • Is Socialism Always Authoritarian? Could Capitalism Be Authoritarian? If So, What Is An Example Of Authoritarian Capitalism?

    You are, as is common, due to ‘suggestion’ (deception) by false dichotomy, falling prey to the wrong question. the question is do you want rule of law resulting in markets, or rule by discretion (command), resulting in the absence of markets.

    The answer is, that the contemporary fantasy is that we should maximize our abiity to extract taxation in order to maximize redistsribution. This is good for dysgenic families and individuals. The opposite proosal is to minimize taxation and redistribution, and fund eugenic (meritocratic) families and individuals.

    The free riders (the majority) that do not compete in the market but join large organizations whether private, semi-private, or public, and those who ‘talk for a living’ meaning teachers, academics, media, and politicians, can use democracy to extract from eugenic families and productive individuals in order to fund dysgenic families and unproductive, parasitic, and predatory individuals.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-socialism-always-authoritarian-Could-capitalism-be-authoritarian-If-so-what-is-an-example-of-authoritarian-capitalism

  • What Did Obama Achieve? Besides His Stooges On The Supreme Court Giving Us Gay Marriage?

    He did more damage to western civilization than anyone since the first world war.

    https://www.quora.com/What-did-Obama-achieve-Besides-his-stooges-on-the-Supreme-Court-giving-us-gay-marriage

  • Is Socialism Always Authoritarian? Could Capitalism Be Authoritarian? If So, What Is An Example Of Authoritarian Capitalism?

    You are, as is common, due to ‘suggestion’ (deception) by false dichotomy, falling prey to the wrong question. the question is do you want rule of law resulting in markets, or rule by discretion (command), resulting in the absence of markets.

    The answer is, that the contemporary fantasy is that we should maximize our abiity to extract taxation in order to maximize redistsribution. This is good for dysgenic families and individuals. The opposite proosal is to minimize taxation and redistribution, and fund eugenic (meritocratic) families and individuals.

    The free riders (the majority) that do not compete in the market but join large organizations whether private, semi-private, or public, and those who ‘talk for a living’ meaning teachers, academics, media, and politicians, can use democracy to extract from eugenic families and productive individuals in order to fund dysgenic families and unproductive, parasitic, and predatory individuals.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-socialism-always-authoritarian-Could-capitalism-be-authoritarian-If-so-what-is-an-example-of-authoritarian-capitalism

  • My answer to What are good introductory books to study about states, politics, a

    My answer to What are good introductory books to study about states, politics, and public laws? https://www.quora.com/What-are-good-introductory-books-to-study-about-states-politics-and-public-laws/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 14:44:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/946753824110399490

  • What Are Good Introductory Books To Study About States, Politics, And Public Laws?

    THE BEST ANSWER I KNOW OF

    The reason we are in this post-enlightenment political and pseudoscientific debacle is that Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche had very different beliefs about human nature – they expressed their own Aristocratic, Middle Class, and Underclass perceptions of man. And today we see Nietzschean(‘Aryan’), Hobbesian (authoritarian), Lockean (libertarian), Rousseauian (Social-Democratic) and Marxist(socialist and communist) SELF PROJECTIONS of the nature of man. When in reality, our physical brains are structured in a spectrum from the very masculine(Aryan), to the very feminine (Marxist), and we are totally incognizant of our cognitive biases.

    So the first problem is understanding MAN before we can judge rule, government, politics, economics, norms, and religion. And that is provided by science. Then we can understand Politics.

    OUR MINDS (PREPARE YOU)
    Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain)
    Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind)
    Simon Baron-Cohen: The Essential Difference (The Cognitive Biases)
    Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition)
    Paul Fussell: Class (the class biases)
    Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective)

    MAN (POLITICAL ORDERS)
    Matt Ridley: The Red Queen
    Dale Petersen: Demonic Males
    William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization
    Nicholas Wade: A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History
    Peter Turchin: Ultrasociety: How 10,000 Years of War Made Humans the Greatest Cooperators on Earth
    Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation’s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own
    Francis Fukuyama: Political Order and Political Decay

    THE UNIQUENESS OF THE WEST (IF YOU ARE INTERESTED)
    Ricardo Duchesne: The Uniqueness of Western Civilization
    JP Mallory: In Search of Indo Europeans
    John Keegan: A History Of Warfare
    Emmanuel Todd: The Explanation of Ideology
    Emmanuel Todd: The Invention of Europe
    Karen Armstrong : The Great Transformation
    Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization

    THE NATURAL COMMON LAW (Rule of Law)
    Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law.
    Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law.
    Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty

    20th CENTURY CONTEXT (WHAT WENT WRONG)
    Stephen Hicks : Explaining Postmodernism
    Hans Hoppe: Democracy The God That Failed

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-good-introductory-books-to-study-about-states-politics-and-public-laws