Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
My answer to The results of the 2016 General Election, is proof the United State
My answer to The results of the 2016 General Election, is proof the United States isn’t a democracy (it’s a plutoc… https://www.quora.com/The-results-of-the-2016-General-Election-is-proof-the-United-States-isnt-a-democracy-its-a-plutocractic-oligarchy-why-doesnt-it-end-its-hypocritical-crusade-for-democracy-and-focus-on-improving-international/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 16:10:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974317027094614016
-
The united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom a
The united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom agree to operate democratically and resolve conflicts in commerce and war via the federal government, similarly to how the Church formed a weak government over the various states of Europe. The states, regions, and ‘nine’ super-regions, are genetically(yes), demographically, culturally, and legally different. They are also of vastly different sizes, just as the states of europe(germanic), and eastern europe(slavic) are different sizes. And while each state gains proportional representation in the house, equal representation in the senate, it is the majority of the STATES that determine the presidency – not one’s vote. This was designed so that big (immigrant) states could not virtually enslave the smaller and more homogenous states. When you vote, you vote for your state, not for the country, because you are just as much an enemy as a friend of people in other parts of the country. And this is how it was set. If there is any question whatsoever of as SINGLE democracy, then we do not live in separate states each satisfying the want and needs of the groups that inhabit them, then we are a tyrannical empire that oppresses those states. The underlying problem is why we joined vastly different civilizations in 1789 did not separate after the war of 1812 when the north wanted to secede, did not separate in 1865, when the south wanted to secede, and do not separate today when it appears that at least five, but ast many as ten different nations, consisting of subsets of our states, want to seceded. The only problem heretofore has been external military pressure. Without the european aggression of the pre-war period, or the opportunity to ‘steal’ the western 3/4 of the continent after the Louisiana Purchase, or defend ourselves from postwar communism, (and it looks like communism’s follow-on: islamism is coming to an end) then there is no reason to remain united whatsoever, when the consequence is constant internecine warfare slowly turning into open civil war. Our government is an empire that has outlived its usefulness as holding the world system of finance and trade together after the collapse of european colonialism. It’s time to return to the norm of western civilization: small states that cater to the wants and needs of their people – not to the will of the majority who, by all measures, will always be those least able, least productive, least knowledgeable, and demonstrably least moral. -
united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom agree
https://www.quora.com/The-results-of-the-2016-General-Election-is-proof-the-United-States-isnt-a-democracy-its-a-plutocractic-oligarchy-why-doesnt-it-end-its-hypocritical-crusade-for-democracy-and-focus-on-improving-international/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b581fd1c&srid=u4QvThe united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom agree to operate democratically and resolve conflicts in commerce and war via the federal government, similarly to how the Church formed a weak government over the various states of Europe.
The states, regions, and ‘nine’ super-regions, are genetically(yes), demographically, culturally, and legally different.
They are also of vastly different sizes, just as the states of europe(germanic), and eastern europe(slavic) are different sizes.
And while each state gains proportional representation in the house, equal representation in the senate, it is the majority of the STATES that determine the presidency – not one’s vote.
This was designed so that big (immigrant) states could not virtually enslave the smaller and more homogenous states.
When you vote, you vote for your state, not for the country, because you are just as much an enemy as a friend of people in other parts of the country. And this is how it was set.
If there is any question whatsoever of as SINGLE democracy, then we do not live in separate states each satisfying the want and needs of the groups that inhabit them, then we are a tyrannical empire that oppresses those states.
The underlying problem is why we joined vastly different civilizations in 1789 did not separate after the war of 1812 when the north wanted to secede, did not separate in 1865, when the south wanted to secede, and do not separate today when it appears that at least five, but ast many as ten different nations, consisting of subsets of our states, want to seceded.
The only problem heretofore has been external military pressure. Without the european aggression of the pre-war period, or the opportunity to ‘steal’ the western 3/4 of the continent after the Louisiana Purchase, or defend ourselves from postwar communism, (and it looks like communism’s follow-on: islamism is coming to an end) then there is no reason to remain united whatsoever, when the consequence is constant internecine warfare slowly turning into open civil war.
Our government is an empire that has outlived its usefulness as holding the world system of finance and trade together after the collapse of european colonialism.
It’s time to return to the norm of western civilization: small states that cater to the wants and needs of their people – not to the will of the majority who, by all measures, will always be those least able, least productive, least knowledgeable, and demonstrably least moral.Updated Mar 15, 2018, 12:10 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 12:10:00 UTC
-
The united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom a
The united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom agree to operate democratically and resolve conflicts in commerce and war via the federal government, similarly to how the Church formed a weak government over the various states of Europe. The states, regions, and ‘nine’ super-regions, are genetically(yes), demographically, culturally, and legally different. They are also of vastly different sizes, just as the states of europe(germanic), and eastern europe(slavic) are different sizes. And while each state gains proportional representation in the house, equal representation in the senate, it is the majority of the STATES that determine the presidency – not one’s vote. This was designed so that big (immigrant) states could not virtually enslave the smaller and more homogenous states. When you vote, you vote for your state, not for the country, because you are just as much an enemy as a friend of people in other parts of the country. And this is how it was set. If there is any question whatsoever of as SINGLE democracy, then we do not live in separate states each satisfying the want and needs of the groups that inhabit them, then we are a tyrannical empire that oppresses those states. The underlying problem is why we joined vastly different civilizations in 1789 did not separate after the war of 1812 when the north wanted to secede, did not separate in 1865, when the south wanted to secede, and do not separate today when it appears that at least five, but ast many as ten different nations, consisting of subsets of our states, want to seceded. The only problem heretofore has been external military pressure. Without the european aggression of the pre-war period, or the opportunity to ‘steal’ the western 3/4 of the continent after the Louisiana Purchase, or defend ourselves from postwar communism, (and it looks like communism’s follow-on: islamism is coming to an end) then there is no reason to remain united whatsoever, when the consequence is constant internecine warfare slowly turning into open civil war. Our government is an empire that has outlived its usefulness as holding the world system of finance and trade together after the collapse of european colonialism. It’s time to return to the norm of western civilization: small states that cater to the wants and needs of their people – not to the will of the majority who, by all measures, will always be those least able, least productive, least knowledgeable, and demonstrably least moral. -
The Results Of The 2016 General Election, Is Proof The United States Isn’t A Democracy, But A Plutocratic Oligarchy. Why Doesn’t It End Its Hypocritical Crusade For Democracy, And Focus On Improving International Relations With China And Russia?
The united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom agree to operate democratically and resolve conflicts in commerce and war via the federal government, similarly to how the Church formed a weak government over the various states of Europe.
The states, regions, and ‘nine’ super-regions, are genetically(yes), demographically, culturally, and legally different.
They are also of vastly different sizes, just as the states of europe(germanic), and eastern europe(slavic) are different sizes.
And while each state gains proportional representation in the house, equal representation in the senate, it is the majority of the STATES that determine the presidency – not one’s vote.This was designed so that big (immigrant) states could not virtually enslave the smaller and more homogenous states.
When you vote, you vote for your state, not for the country, because you are just as much an enemy as a friend of people in other parts of the country. And this is how it was set.
If there is any question whatsoever of as SINGLE democracy, then we do not live in separate states each satisfying the want and needs of the groups that inhabit them, then we are a tyrannical empire that oppresses those states.
The underlying problem is why we joined vastly different civilizations in 1789 did not separate after the war of 1812 when the north wanted to secede, did not separate in 1865, when the south wanted to secede, and do not separate today when it appears that at least five, but ast many as ten different nations, consisting of subsets of our states, want to seceded.
The only problem heretofore has been external military pressure. Without the european aggression of the pre-war period, or the opportunity to ‘steal’ the western 3/4 of the continent after the Louisiana Purchase, or defend ourselves from postwar communism, (and it looks like communism’s follow-on: islamism is coming to an end) then there is no reason to remain united whatsoever, when the consequence is constant internecine warfare slowly turning into open civil war.
Our government is an empire that has outlived its usefulness as holding the world system of finance and trade together after the collapse of european colonialism.
It’s time to return to the norm of western civilization: small states that cater to the wants and needs of their people – not to the will of the majority who, by all measures, will always be those least able, least productive, least knowledgeable, and demonstrably least moral.
https://www.quora.com/The-results-of-the-2016-general-election-is-proof-the-United-States-isnt-a-democracy-but-a-plutocratic-oligarchy-Why-doesnt-it-end-its-hypocritical-crusade-for-democracy-and-focus-on-improving-international
-
The Results Of The 2016 General Election, Is Proof The United States Isn’t A Democracy, But A Plutocratic Oligarchy. Why Doesn’t It End Its Hypocritical Crusade For Democracy, And Focus On Improving International Relations With China And Russia?
The united states is not ONE democracy, but a COLLECTION OF STATES all of whom agree to operate democratically and resolve conflicts in commerce and war via the federal government, similarly to how the Church formed a weak government over the various states of Europe.
The states, regions, and ‘nine’ super-regions, are genetically(yes), demographically, culturally, and legally different.
They are also of vastly different sizes, just as the states of europe(germanic), and eastern europe(slavic) are different sizes.
And while each state gains proportional representation in the house, equal representation in the senate, it is the majority of the STATES that determine the presidency – not one’s vote.This was designed so that big (immigrant) states could not virtually enslave the smaller and more homogenous states.
When you vote, you vote for your state, not for the country, because you are just as much an enemy as a friend of people in other parts of the country. And this is how it was set.
If there is any question whatsoever of as SINGLE democracy, then we do not live in separate states each satisfying the want and needs of the groups that inhabit them, then we are a tyrannical empire that oppresses those states.
The underlying problem is why we joined vastly different civilizations in 1789 did not separate after the war of 1812 when the north wanted to secede, did not separate in 1865, when the south wanted to secede, and do not separate today when it appears that at least five, but ast many as ten different nations, consisting of subsets of our states, want to seceded.
The only problem heretofore has been external military pressure. Without the european aggression of the pre-war period, or the opportunity to ‘steal’ the western 3/4 of the continent after the Louisiana Purchase, or defend ourselves from postwar communism, (and it looks like communism’s follow-on: islamism is coming to an end) then there is no reason to remain united whatsoever, when the consequence is constant internecine warfare slowly turning into open civil war.
Our government is an empire that has outlived its usefulness as holding the world system of finance and trade together after the collapse of european colonialism.
It’s time to return to the norm of western civilization: small states that cater to the wants and needs of their people – not to the will of the majority who, by all measures, will always be those least able, least productive, least knowledgeable, and demonstrably least moral.
https://www.quora.com/The-results-of-the-2016-general-election-is-proof-the-United-States-isnt-a-democracy-but-a-plutocratic-oligarchy-Why-doesnt-it-end-its-hypocritical-crusade-for-democracy-and-focus-on-improving-international
-
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that courts function via-negativa: as findings of fact in the resolution of disputes, by the single test of reciprocity. The production of commons, by council, thang, senate, or house in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that the commons is produced via-positiva: as agreements on the seizure of potential opportunities given limited resources to invest. As far as I know the criteria of decidability remains the same no matter the scale and organization of the means of arriving at a decision. We adjudicate certain measures in one court, or a series of courts, depending upon the scale of its affect. We contract for certain commons in one Thang, or many Thangs, depending upon the scale of its affect. Among the classes (martial/masculine, commercial (neutral) and familial(priestly/female), we must often vary the means of decidability in order to preserve reciprocity. In all cases we create procedures to preserve reciprocity while producing the returns of aggressive via negativa, and opportunistic via-positiva. So the constitution (the milita’s self insurance) provides the principle organizing method. ALl else is via negativa and via positiva procedure so that the reciprocity necessary for sovereignty under a universal militia insuring one another’s sovereignty, is preserved through the institutions that allow that militia to scale and thereby create the returns on their singe most important investment: reciprocity of sovereignty. (Note that I never fall into pragmatism throughout…..) -
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that courts function via-negativa: as findings of fact in the resolution of disputes, by the single test of reciprocity.
The production of commons, by council, thang, senate, or house in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that the commons is produced via-positiva: as agreements on the seizure of potential opportunities given limited resources to invest.
As far as I know the criteria of decidability remains the same no matter the scale and organization of the means of arriving at a decision.
We adjudicate certain measures in one court, or a series of courts, depending upon the scale of its affect.
We contract for certain commons in one Thang, or many Thangs, depending upon the scale of its affect.
Among the classes (martial/masculine, commercial (neutral) and familial(priestly/female), we must often vary the means of decidability in order to preserve reciprocity.
In all cases we create procedures to preserve reciprocity while producing the returns of aggressive via negativa, and opportunistic via-positiva.
So the constitution (the milita’s self insurance) provides the principle organizing method. ALl else is via negativa and via positiva procedure so that the reciprocity necessary for sovereignty under a universal militia insuring one another’s sovereignty, is preserved through the institutions that allow that militia to scale and thereby create the returns on their singe most important investment: reciprocity of sovereignty.
(Note that I never fall into pragmatism throughout…..)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 12:34:00 UTC
-
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that courts function via-negativa: as findings of fact in the resolution of disputes, by the single test of reciprocity. The production of commons, by council, thang, senate, or house in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that the commons is produced via-positiva: as agreements on the seizure of potential opportunities given limited resources to invest. As far as I know the criteria of decidability remains the same no matter the scale and organization of the means of arriving at a decision. We adjudicate certain measures in one court, or a series of courts, depending upon the scale of its affect. We contract for certain commons in one Thang, or many Thangs, depending upon the scale of its affect. Among the classes (martial/masculine, commercial (neutral) and familial(priestly/female), we must often vary the means of decidability in order to preserve reciprocity. In all cases we create procedures to preserve reciprocity while producing the returns of aggressive via negativa, and opportunistic via-positiva. So the constitution (the milita’s self insurance) provides the principle organizing method. ALl else is via negativa and via positiva procedure so that the reciprocity necessary for sovereignty under a universal militia insuring one another’s sovereignty, is preserved through the institutions that allow that militia to scale and thereby create the returns on their singe most important investment: reciprocity of sovereignty. (Note that I never fall into pragmatism throughout…..)