Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • The Hierarchy of Revolutionary Arguments

      Think of revolutionary arguments as a pyramid: – The theory (strategy) – The Incentives (science) of that strategy – The law (constitution) reflecting those incentives – The generational institutions (“government”) utilizing those incentives – The Intergenerational institutions (“education, religion”) retaining the strategy, incentives, law, and institutions). – The benefits for members (“rewards”) produced by those incentives, law, and institutions. – The motivations (“agitations”) that they produce by those what would obtain those benefits. – The Plan (“revolution”) that provides the opportunity for those whose motivations are sufficient to act – to do so. ||> Intellectuals > operators > citizens > agitators, revolutionaries: Arguments(solutions) for each. And let the weight of self interest drive the revolution – just like the enlightenment did and the eastern conquest of the western empire by levantine christianity did. I start at the top and work down. Most people start at the bottom and never make it past motivations. I expect others to take the ideas and communicate the benefits, inspire the motivations, and to organize the revolution according to plans that are fairly tactical. And I expect to pay a pretty high price for doing all of this work, and I”m ok with it. May 26, 2018 10:31am

  • “Do you consider yourself an Austrian?”– I have evolved (by accident) into a sp

    –“Do you consider yourself an Austrian?”–

    I have evolved (by accident) into a specialist in natural law (reciprocity) and rule of law (non-discretion), resulting in markets(voluntary cooperation) in all walks of life. Part of this specialization is an extraordinarily precise criteria for truthful speech, the result of which is completing the scientific method.

    So since Austrian econ is the closest possible model to rule of law, I tend to consider myself somewhere between austrian and chicago, with a bias probably toward chicago.

    Austrian econ is an appropriated term. Because there are two branches : Mengerian, which is fully integrated into mainstream thought, and Misesian, which is not.

    I’ve written exhaustively about the failures of Mises and Rothbard in particular even if Mises came very close to one of the most important discoveries in economic history.

    He calls this positivist (justificationary) discipline ‘praxeology’, but this is pseudoscientific. If you however, combine mises with popper (falsificationism), and mathematical intuitionism and the operationalist movement in physics, you realize that mises tried to make a positive axiomatic logic out of economics, rather than realize he had discovered falsificationism in economics. And then rothbard came along and ruined Mises reputation so badly that we can’t rescue it.

    To say you are an Austrian today probably means nothing other than that you seek to improve institutions of cooperation, and are rather firm in the belief that the business cycle must be allowed to self correct regularly or it will only increase and expand corrections until a ‘collapse’.

    To be a ‘praxeologist’ in the positivist stense requires you’re a bit of an idiot – because in fact, economic phenomenon at any scale must eventually be discovered empirically. On the other hand, as a falsificationist, to say ‘If I can’t construct that phenomenon from rational human choices then it can’t be true” means you’ve learned the lesson that Mises inarticulately tried to teach us.

    As far as I know Austrian Econ today favors the study of behavior, entrepreneurship(individual choice), political economy(institutional impact on economies), and preservation of rule of law over rule by discretion. So the state is the provider of cooperative institutions.

    As far as I know Chicago tends to maintain these but emphasize monetary policy moreso – with the state as insurer of last resort.

    As far as I know Saltwater (Mainstream) tends to seek to maximize consumption at the expense of rule of law – replacing it with rule by discretion, with the state as the direct manipulator of the economy.

    These are actually moral predispositions which is why people self select into these specializations.

    I’m a scientist in that discipline we call law (cooperation). And as such I favor the austrian and chicago methods of action over the saltwater.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 18:00:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33216273_10156373327492264_55641310

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/33216273_10156373327492264_5564131042501066752_o_10156373327487264.jpg Kaiser SchimdtThis is a perfect explanation of why making “repeal the 19th” your only talking point is silly.May 22, 2018 7:12pmCurt Doolittleexplain?May 22, 2018 7:14pmRyan WilliamsRepeal the 19th, the 13th , 14th and the 15th.May 22, 2018 7:14pmAlex MorganWho made the chart?May 22, 2018 7:15pmWilliam McDuffie IIYeah pretty spot onMay 22, 2018 7:17pmKaiser SchimdtThere’s a lot of manosphere types who claim that the source of all our problems come from women voting. While women do lean more towards the left than men, white women are still right-wing just to a lesser degree. I’m not saying women voting is a good idea, but allowing non-whites to vote has been far more destructive.

    Of course, both barring women and non-whites from voting is too far outside of the overton window right now. This is why I would simply advocate banning people who receive money from the state from voting. It would shift elections rightward and could be justified within the context of the current zeitgeist.May 22, 2018 7:18pmErnest HeideggerRepeal every amendment after XMay 22, 2018 7:19pmEdgar BraintreeI’m fine with presidential term limits and barring Congress from voting itself pay raisesMay 22, 2018 7:30pmEric BumpusThis is why we should push for a competency test. It wouldn’t even need to be a difficult test. This would eliminate a good amount of women, they hate test taking or competition where they might be judged. Second, this would eliminate anyone that doesn’t speak English. Third, it would widen the margin of the IQ base. This would also be much easier to install than removing amendments.May 22, 2018 7:32pmKaiser SchimdtI’d be all for thisMay 22, 2018 7:32pmErnest HeideggerSmall price to pay.May 22, 2018 7:32pmWilliam McDuffie IICan’t do it based off of IQ anymore. Dems think it’s racistMay 22, 2018 7:33pmEric Bumpus@[100012494026295:2048:William McDuffie II] Thats not what I was trying to convey. If “Whites vs Blacks” were to take a test which demographic we be more likely to have a better success rate. One would think the groups with higher IQ.May 22, 2018 7:34pmWilliam McDuffie II@[100000457910525:2048:Eric Bumpus] you missed what I’m trying to convey. Dems don’t want itMay 22, 2018 7:36pmClark JeffreyGoal number 1 for the Republican Party if it wishes to exist in the future: end ALL (legal and illegal) immigration from Latin America.May 22, 2018 7:36pmRyan Williams@[100009772389681:2048:Kaiser Schimdt] so basically women and brown people?May 22, 2018 7:37pmEric Bumpus@[100012494026295:2048:William McDuffie II] I have no doubt they would fight it. Out of all battles that we can fight non violently, I think it has the most success of winning.May 22, 2018 7:38pmKaiser SchimdtSingle women/single mothers. Women married with children are fairly right-wing and it would be counter-productive to oppose them.May 22, 2018 7:38pmWilliam McDuffie II@[100000457910525:2048:Eric Bumpus] Not at all. Minorities will believe it’s racist because they themselves are actually racist. Dems dog whistleMay 22, 2018 7:39pmEric Bumpus@[100012494026295:2048:William McDuffie II] You can’t debate irrationality. You have to lure the “few” rational Dems that are left.May 22, 2018 7:41pmWilliam McDuffie IINo such thing. Not nowadaysMay 22, 2018 7:41pmEric Bumpus@[100012494026295:2048:William McDuffie II] If there were any they’ve already left the party.May 22, 2018 7:41pmKaiser SchimdtThey did denounce having to show ID to vote as being racist, so yeah, they’ll attack anything we do as racistMay 22, 2018 7:42pmEric Bumpus@[100009772389681:2048:Kaiser Schimdt] I was actually thinking that would be the perfect bait. Give up voter id “for those poor black folks” for voter competency test or something to that effect.May 22, 2018 7:45pmWilliam McDuffie II@[100000457910525:2048:Eric Bumpus] The few that are left if they are decent people are serial altruistMay 22, 2018 7:45pmEric Bumpus@[100012494026295:2048:William McDuffie II] That’s been my experience too.May 22, 2018 7:46pmRyan WilliamsWomen with no husbands are parasites, but married women are still too liberal.May 22, 2018 7:56pmKaiser SchimdtSure, but white women as a whole are still slightly more conservative than the general population. I would wager significantly more conservative if you only look at married women.May 22, 2018 7:59pmEli HarmanThe effect of barring minorities from voting would be positive (for whites.) The effect of barring women from voting would be positive (for men especially, but actually for women too, at least in the long run.) It’s true that white women vote better, on average, than minority men. But disenfranchising women would disenfranchise minority women too. And white women still don’t vote as well as white men. So the effects of each policy would be positive. There is no difference there, except perhaps in their relative magnitudes. But that could go either way.May 22, 2018 8:01pmChris LavanI can talk to any man about how women have no business voting. Disenfranchising minorities is a harder sell. Seems like the path of least resistance.

    But can the right win anything? Is taking the vote back in any capacity a possible future? I think we’ll just continue to lose until we’re all dead or civil war.May 22, 2018 8:23pmCurt DoolittlehousesMay 22, 2018 8:23pmRyan Williamshow to construct those houses is the biggest political science problem of the 21st centuryMay 22, 2018 8:30pmHoward Van Der Klauw@[100000457910525:2048:Eric] but won’t voter ID become even more important when you have to prove you have passed the competence test?May 22, 2018 8:37pmEric Bumpus@[1286874611:2048:Howard Van Der Klauw] those with ID could take the test pre vote. Those without would have to take it immediately before.May 22, 2018 8:55pmGreg HamiltonRemove all after 10….May 22, 2018 9:07pmMichael ChurchillWhat about the cost in terms of riots and mayhem from disenfranchising minorities?May 22, 2018 9:15pmRyan Williams@[714714586:2048:Michael Churchill] cheaper than continued indulgence of parasites.May 22, 2018 11:08pmCorbus AureliusWhy? There are more women than exists people in either ethnic group in toto.May 23, 2018 5:22amKen JaloonSo minority men vote like minority women.May 23, 2018 8:35amMary RomanoYou cannot push for anything until you get rid of the (((lobby))) that controls the government. Please watch JF Gariepy’s video with Frame Games. First things first.May 23, 2018 8:45amMary Romano80% of the top donors to the Republican Party are Jewish. Please watch the video of JF Gariepy with Frame Games. The RP has no interest whatsoever in “existing” in its current form. They simply update their platform as the demographics change. During the past 3 years, there has been a revolution of thought and now it’s time to take action. Anyone in these forums MUST belong to a group that is active in building legal and lobbying power. The message is ready. If you don’t belong to a group, you are doing nothing.May 23, 2018 8:51amMary RomanoKaiser Schimdt Who cares what you would do? You cannot do anything cause you have no political power. Watch JF Gariepy’s video with Frame games. It’s the most important political discussion that has come out in 50 years. Join a group and pay your dues. Hold other people accountable for joining groups and paying their dues. Bloviating on the internet is ok but dedicate 50% of your political time to it rather than 100%. IMay 23, 2018 8:55amCurt DoolittlePEOPLE VOTE BY RACIAL BLOCK WITH WHITE WOMEN BEING THE ONLY DEFECTORSMay 23, 2018 9:08amEli HarmanFact: making men subject to women’s votes will never be OK and will never produce any outcome worth producing. Period.May 23, 2018 10:30amKaiser SchimdtI’m glad you have such strong opinions about what I should do on my own time. I’m very active irl and am part of a few dues paying organizationsMay 23, 2018 10:52amJohn MarkRegarding “joining dues-paying organizations” as a solution: the True Right (white men, roughly) have a problem in that our instinct as to how to spend our time is to be *productive* and *pursue mastery* and climb *true merit heirarchies*. On the other hand, it is instinctive for leftist customer groups to spend their time creating and filling parasitic political power organizations, because *that is all they have* – they *can’t* climb true merit heirarchies so they play their only other card: “go straight for political power”.

    This fundamental difference in instinct, from what I can tell, means “joining dues paying organizations” will not ultimately work as a solution for us, because we can’t match the left’s intensity of motivation in that arena. The result is probably that white men will put up with the parasites until they just snap and hit the reset button.May 23, 2018 11:06amTim Spillane@[741197263:2048:Curt] what do you make of high IQ white male New Englanders voting blue? I’ve heard you argue it’s signaling for status but is it reducible entirely to that?May 23, 2018 11:23amCurt DoolittleIt’s actually pretty simple:

    Connecticut: Yale, Trinity, Wesleyan, Fairfield County (Essentially Long island in ct), dead-manufacturing( old GM, current United Technologies.) Irish, Italian, puerto rican.

    Massachusetts: Harvard, MIT, Boston College (Women outnumber men in Boston 5 to 7. Irish Catholic, Italian, / Unions.

    New York: Columbia, NYU, Arts, Advertising, Marketing, (Women outnumber men).

    IN GENERAL: Puritanical Value System = Virtue Signaling.May 23, 2018 11:31amCurt Doolittle(Vermont is French Catholic – french immigrants were ALL underclass, while british immigrants were heavily middle class.)May 23, 2018 11:32amEric BumpusEspecially now that virtue signaling with a Prius is dying with climate change.May 23, 2018 12:33pmRastko MomcilovicThere should have been some way of filtering out bad apples from the voting process. Not necessarily by sex or race, but to eliminate parasites and gibmedats. But I think it’s too late to enact that now without overturning democracy first.May 23, 2018 1:57pmVincent CucchiaraWtf is wrong with the men in MA and VT?May 23, 2018 2:48pmAnnika StarkMost women aren’t competent to make political decisions. Some vote right, but not enough to undo the damage caused by those who vote left. They make decisions based on a desire to appear “nice” to their peers and pat themselves on the back for being compassionate with other peoples’ money. They don’t suffer the lost jobs and increasing misandry that results from liberal policies. Show them a picture of a dead brown kid, and they’ll vote for the person who promises to “do something,” conveniently ignoring all the dead white kids the brown kid’s relatives will run over with trucks and rape during “sexual emergencies.” They are told that having families is “patriarchal oppression,” so they lavish their bottled-up maternal instincts on immigrants and criminals.

    Looks to me like white men want to keep what they earn, and non-white men what to keep what white men earn.May 23, 2018 3:01pmRichard NikoleyThe two bottom rows are euphemistically labeled.

    Should be Parasites and Parasites.May 23, 2018 9:45pmTrevor BrightmanRevoke wamyns suffrage when?May 23, 2018 10:49pmAnthony Migchels’let’s educate women!’, they said. ‘They need to vote!’.May 24, 2018 6:45amFrank NovaYour vote count factor should be proportional to your taxes paid divided by total taxes collected in the population.May 24, 2018 10:30amCurt Doolittlethat’s called ‘economic democracy’May 24, 2018 12:49pmGraham NearyMarried white women voted for Trump.May 24, 2018 1:18pmKevin O’KeeffeIf only the votes of White women had been counted, I really doubt that would’ve pushed Wisconsin into Hillary’s column.May 25, 2018 12:14amBriton FecketteWhite Sharia for these scummy kunts.May 25, 2018 11:58pm

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-22 19:09:00 UTC

  • And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the

    And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 01:40:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998377848334413826

    Reply addressees: @KialoHQ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996337335544500229

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Kialo

    What is right? Can we say? Can you? How would anyone know they were right? How can you tell? Join the Kialo debate on whether morality is objective! https://t.co/DLBPz7YxvI

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996337335544500229

  • The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural L

    The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 01:38:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998377491445243904

    Reply addressees: @KialoHQ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996337335544500229

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Kialo

    What is right? Can we say? Can you? How would anyone know they were right? How can you tell? Join the Kialo debate on whether morality is objective! https://t.co/DLBPz7YxvI

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996337335544500229

  • MORALITY IS OBJECTIVE AND THE CONSTITUTION IS CONSTRUCTED FROM IT. 1) Moral Obje

    MORALITY IS OBJECTIVE AND THE CONSTITUTION IS CONSTRUCTED FROM IT.

    1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion.

    2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy.

    3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy.

    The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind.

    And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to Europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south.

    The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 21:48:00 UTC

  • Morality Is Objective and The Constitution Is Constructed from It.

    1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion. 2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy. 3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy. The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind. And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to Europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south. The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.
    May 20, 2018 9:48pm

  • Morality Is Objective and The Constitution Is Constructed from It.

    1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion. 2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy. 3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy. The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind. And that constitution survived until the war of northern aggression by which the industrialized north conquered the south because the west would have allied with the south and left the north a weak competitor to Europe, dominated by the agrarian aristocratic south. The constitution was the first written attempt to formally capture The Natural Law of Reciprocity as the means of decidability in political order: They invented The Third Way: Middle Class Market Meritocracy vs Upper/Martial, or Lower/Religious monopoly.
    May 20, 2018 9:48pm

  • Steven Pinker: liberals pursue power to rule by discretion. conservatives pursue

    Steven Pinker: liberals pursue power to rule by discretion. conservatives pursue the power to deny others power so we are subject to rule of law. Liberals=equality (impossible), Conservatives=Reciprocity(possible). @sapinker

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 15:21:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996410135483437056

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995989083921973249

    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    This is really good, period. That it was written by an undergraduate is extraordinary. https://t.co/Lku1llXmMW

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995989083921973249

  • LAYING DOWN THE LAW ON SOCIAL PSEUDOSCIENCE @KennethBuff @sapinker People vote P

    LAYING DOWN THE LAW ON SOCIAL PSEUDOSCIENCE

    @KennethBuff @sapinker

    People vote POWER given the CONDITIONS of competition. That’s why Democracy works for selecting priorities in a homogenous polity but not choosing differences in a heterogeneous polity, and why there is so much friction between American ‘tribes’.

    Any time we state an incomplete premise we feed discord by supplying bias confirmation by doing the cherry picking for them.

    He (Steve) stated an incomplete premise in order to feed the confirmation bias of a majority faction – not the Truth. (Hence the legal requirement for “The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth”)

    What the NYT article referred to conveys is that virtue signaling is a form of conspicuous consumption that one forces others to pay the indirect cost of. (Theft by Fraud)

    Or stated directly: we are burning the most valuable form of capital in the world (homogeneity and high trust) for virtue signals, in order to obtain political power.

    If you cannot make a statement in social science using economic terms, then either you don’t know what you’re talking about, or you are engaged in selection bias, or worse, deception.

    Hence the rise of “Economic Imperialism” in the Academy as a counter to social pseudoscience.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 10:37:00 UTC