Theme: Constitutional Order

  • We Must Correct Our Error. We Begin and End with The Militia.

    We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA. Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.

  • We Must Correct Our Error. We Begin and End with The Militia.

    We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA. Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.

  • @Michael Shermer When you start the 1st Mars colony @elonmusk what documents wou

    @Michael Shermer

    When you start the 1st Mars colony @elonmusk what documents would you recommend using to establish a governing system? U.S. Constitution/Bill of Rights? Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Humanist Manifesto? Atlas Shrugged? Against the State: An Anarcho-Capitalist Manifesto?

    @elonmusk

    Replying to @michaelshermer

    Direct democracy by the people. Laws must be short, as there is trickery in length. Automatic expiration of rules to prevent death by bureaucracy. Any rule can be removed by 40% of people to overcome inertia. Freedom.

    @curtdoolittle

    Replying to @elonmusk @michaelshermer

    1) One cannot make law only discover applications of reciprocity, since the only ‘law’ of cooperation is reciprocity.

    2) One can construct legislation as a contract between members of the polity, and legislation must be strictly constructed in operational terms from reciprocity.

    3) Commons and Norms the require defense must be enumerated.

    4) All contracts must expire within the working lifetime of the enactors.

    5) Apply all fees to ends. Prohibit pooling of funds (and therefore discretion).

    6) Non-retroactivity, Universal Applicability, and Universal Standing, and in particular, Universal Standing in matters of the Commons (prevents circumvention of the judiciary as a limit on markets and therefore prevent possibility of corruption.)

    7) Simplicity (brevity) will result from the practice of 1-6.

    8) Closing: most problems with common law of tort arose because the state intervened in the law, and deprived the citizenry of standing in matters of the commons. (See England, Coal, Mills).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 16:12:00 UTC

  • WE MUST CORRECT OUR ERROR. WE BEGIN AND END WITH THE MILITIA. We must discard ou

    WE MUST CORRECT OUR ERROR. WE BEGIN AND END WITH THE MILITIA.

    We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA.

    Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:28:00 UTC

  • Hierarchy of Law

    HIERARCHY OF LAW …. Natural Law (reciprocity) vs …. …. Law (findings of judges ) vs …. …. …. Legislation (commands that violate that law ) vs …. …. …. …. Regulation (prior restraint by insurer of last resort) Immigration for whatever reason violates 1) Natural Law , 2) Law, 3) Legislation, 4) Regulation Once you have violated such law *you have no rights*. Which is what violating the law means: removal of rights other than natural law (reciprocity). There are no extraordinary circumstances. That’s what rule of law means: i) non-discretion, ii) universal applicability, iii) universal standing.
  • Hierarchy of Law

    HIERARCHY OF LAW …. Natural Law (reciprocity) vs …. …. Law (findings of judges ) vs …. …. …. Legislation (commands that violate that law ) vs …. …. …. …. Regulation (prior restraint by insurer of last resort) Immigration for whatever reason violates 1) Natural Law , 2) Law, 3) Legislation, 4) Regulation Once you have violated such law *you have no rights*. Which is what violating the law means: removal of rights other than natural law (reciprocity). There are no extraordinary circumstances. That’s what rule of law means: i) non-discretion, ii) universal applicability, iii) universal standing.
  • HIERARCHY OF LAW …. Natural Law (reciprocity) vs …. …. Law (findings of ju

    HIERARCHY OF LAW

    …. Natural Law (reciprocity) vs

    …. …. Law (findings of judges ) vs

    …. …. …. Legislation (commands that violate that law ) vs

    …. …. …. …. Regulation (prior restraint by insurer of last resort)

    Immigration for whatever reason violates

    1) Natural Law , 2) Law, 3) Legislation, 4) Regulation

    Once you have violated such law *you have no rights*.

    Which is what violating the law means: removal of rights other than natural law (reciprocity).

    There are no extraordinary circumstances.

    That’s what rule of law means: i) non-discretion, ii) universal applicability, iii) universal standing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 09:52:00 UTC

  • The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the superseding of common la

    The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the superseding of common law, treason incorporated into law. The state demanding a monopoly of violence, a monopoly of truth, and using the monopoly of violence to enforce the monopoly of truth. And the state conducting alien colonisation is treason by itself.—by Alex Macleod

  • The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the superseding of common la

    The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the superseding of common law, treason incorporated into law. The state demanding a monopoly of violence, a monopoly of truth, and using the monopoly of violence to enforce the monopoly of truth. And the state conducting alien colonisation is treason by itself.—by Alex Macleod

  • by Alex Macleod The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the supersed

    by Alex Macleod

    The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the superseding of common law, treason incorporated into law. The state demanding a monopoly of violence, a monopoly of truth, and using the monopoly of violence to enforce the monopoly of truth. And the state conducting alien colonisation is treason by itself.

    (genius)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 14:12:00 UTC