Theme: Constitutional Order

  • “Hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative soci

    —“Hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative social liberal Constitutionalist Republican?”— someone else, about a friend.

    Eric Danelaw (I view it as a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=286892461907651&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 19:08:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033430827122786306

  • “Hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative soci

    —“Hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative social liberal Constitutionalist Republican?”— someone else, about a friend.

    Eric Danelaw (I view it as a moral crime that this isn’t part of the curriculum)

    Republican (vs democratic, vs authoritarian)

    Representative government should produce legislation and regulation. (Iron law of oligarchy says they will form no matter what so why not construct one that rotates by election.)

    Social Liberal:

    The state should use income from progressive taxation to produce commons of benefit to the people, because they produce multipliers (returns) on investments that limit the practical differential between peoples. (hard to argue with this because no one on earth seems to think otherwise)

    AND the state shall not inhibit the self expression of individuals by the enforcement of norms of the traditional family. ( I view this as a mistake.)

    Economically conservative: the state should operate within a budge and not exacerbate the business cycle, nor export risk between generations. (This will happen shortly as worldwide the keyenesian experiment is coming to an end)

    Constitutionalist: The declaration, constitution, and bill of rights constitute a statement of natural law (reciprocity) under rule of law (limits all of us to reciprocity, particularly members of the state), under universal standing (applies equally to all of us, and to the state, and we have the right of juridical defense from each other regardless of civil, state, or military.) (This remains a problem because the state has dis-intermediated the people from the commons via the courts.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 15:07:00 UTC

  • SO THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT I PROPOSE SOLVING THIS PROBLEM (NATIONAL SOCIALISM) VI

    SO THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT I PROPOSE SOLVING THIS PROBLEM (NATIONAL SOCIALISM) VIA LAW RATHER THAN AUTHORITARIAN RULE.

    —“The only people forced to compete are middle class whites. There’s… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=286823608581203&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 14:50:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033365993706450945

  • SO THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT I PROPOSE SOLVING THIS PROBLEM (NATIONAL SOCIALISM) VI

    SO THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT I PROPOSE SOLVING THIS PROBLEM (NATIONAL SOCIALISM) VIA LAW RATHER THAN AUTHORITARIAN RULE.

    —“The only people forced to compete are middle class whites. There’s socialism for the pharmacapitalists, socialism for the MIC, socialism for Wall Street moneychangers, socialism for International finance, socialism for ZOG bugmen, and socialism for nonwhites at the behest of the former to buy their votes, all at the expense of the only class actually getting unfettered capitalism. (((They))) don’t mean by ‘freedom’ or ‘capitalism’ what whites mean. They demand the “freedom” to privatize profits and socialize costs. This is what capitalism is in their view and how it exists in ZOG occupied states. There is no way to force them to compete. As a necessary step in doing so we must collectivize, and in the process of that collectivization we will have war waged against us. They can only be expelled or destroyed. They don’t accept the premise of competition with the goyim as legitimate.”— Joseph Smith

    All of this is fixable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 10:50:00 UTC

  • Juries. They Matter

    Juries. They Matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 02:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033173173355929602

    Reply addressees: @Septeus7 @FrameGames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033163643066544128


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033163643066544128

  • Mr President, if they even TRY to impeach you, there will be no trial nor congre

    Mr President, if they even TRY to impeach you, there will be no trial nor congress, nor president – because there will no longer exist a united states. And anyone with knowledge of the data knows this is true. We will drain the swamp forever. #Trump #POTUS #Conservative


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 18:36:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032698074467115014

  • The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power

    The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 13:32:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032621670987694080

  • The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power

    The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 09:32:00 UTC

  • To: Adam Voight So what is the difference between philosophy(your work) and law

    To: Adam Voight

    So what is the difference between philosophy(your work) and law (my work) other than uncertain advice (philosophy) and certain decidability(Law)? Or between both an Science:… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=283409782255919&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 17:04:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031950210283565056

  • To: Adam Voight So what is the difference between philosophy(your work) and law

    To: Adam Voight

    So what is the difference between philosophy(your work) and law (my work) other than uncertain advice (philosophy) and certain decidability(Law)? Or between both an Science: “the process of due diligence”.

    ====

    by Adam Voight

    The common thread running through moral and religious diversity is the purpose: cooperation through language. All else is accidental.

    For example, slavery is a moral system. There are universal rules that apply to all humans qua humans: rules that determine who is counted as a slave and who is free. Slave owners all are duty bound to reciprocate the defense of other’s property by returning escaped slaves.

    The only reason slavery is wrong is that there is a better way of doing things> Slave-based societies cannot compete with modern free societies.

    In Marx’s words: slavery is a system of relations of production that correspond to an obsolete stage in the developement of the means of production. This is the “materialist” view of morality, and in this sense both Marx and I are materialists.

    This is the argument running through my whole work. My only innovation is to replace marx’s anthropolgy with its evolutionary equivalent and to augment the latter with Aristotle.

    https://adamvoight.wordpress.com/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 13:04:00 UTC