Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • It was this set of traits that allowed us to develop all the paradigms (discipli

    It was this set of traits that allowed us to develop all the paradigms (disciplines) all of which were united only by those few criteria above. This meant that law > jury > reason > empiricism > science > technology > medicine could evolve …

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 19:54:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068231756980072448

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068231756149600256

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Western civilization was unique in that we developed Heroism, Individual Sovereignty, Truth and Duty, The Natural Law (of tort), and Markets in all aspects of personal, academic, intellectual, commercial, civic, and political life – avoiding theocratic or bureaucratic monopoly.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1068231756149600256

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Western civilization was unique in that we developed Heroism, Individual Sovereignty, Truth and Duty, The Natural Law (of tort), and Markets in all aspects of personal, academic, intellectual, commercial, civic, and political life – avoiding theocratic or bureaucratic monopoly.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1068231756149600256

  • Um. Capitalism turns out to have been a very, very, very good thing for mankind:

    Um. Capitalism turns out to have been a very, very, very good thing for mankind: Rule of Law, Property Rights, State Credit, and Mixed Economies. It’s DEMOCRACY AND EQUALITY that are the problem. Western europe was a thousand years more developed than the rest of the world.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 00:43:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1067942201387352065

    Reply addressees: @frederick_3210

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1067931716101246978

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1067931716101246978

  • (worth repeating) —As members of cults we are always in conflict over the lega

    (worth repeating)

    —As members of cults we are always in conflict over the legal systems under them, since those legal systems are arbitrary means of advocating different group evolutionary strategies of cooperation – all of which, under religion, despite their early utility, evolved to be more hinderance than good.

    As member of the Love of Man, of our Peoples, In nation-states, producing commons suitable to our needs, we are not enemies but allies in a division of labor producing the transcendence of man.

    If there is a better religion than that I do not know what it is.

    But it is the one I am proposing.

    A religion of the love and transcendence of man into gods, not into the subjects of priests and politicians, investors and industrialists.—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-25 20:11:00 UTC

  • THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS: (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restori

    THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS:

    (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restoring violence to the discourse in order to teach the law, and 3. the law I have written recasts libertarians as the judges of the commons.)

    Stellar conversation with James Fox Higgins this morning. 100 minutes. Can’t wait to share it whenever he releases it.

    I learned a few things that I need to get across to the audience.

    1. Um. Please be respectful just to maintain my incentive to invest heavily in being available, but do no not be afraid of me. I am very conscious of what I am doing. When I argue online i’m acting as a judge and prosecutor on one hand, and a disciplinarian of rowdy boys on the other. I am more accommodating as a CEO and even more so as an ordinary guy in conversation. My online personality is my JOB. It is not ME. I am very different in my roles as conversationalist, CEO in business, theoretician-professor, and Prosecutor-Judge.

    2. I am very consciously restoring violence to the discourse, and a lot of my persona and positioning is to do so. Obscuring the fact that violence to force people into markest is the origin of that order we call civilization. It’s not that I enjoy or advocate violence, It’s that upon entry of women in the the political and commercial arena we overly-softened the fact that it is violence alone that creates it, and that the non-violent are RIDERS on that order created by that violence. Conversely, a very small number of men can easily alter the status quo – and have, for millennia.

    3. One of the reasons I set out to destroy the libertarian movement is to restore it to leadership of the conservative movement, by eliminating the attraction of the pacifist narrative of the rothbardian (common property marxist) message. In other words, I worked to deny libertarians the field of ideology and return them to the field of law. Biologically and socially, libertarians serve as the JUDICIAL minority between feminine consumptive, and male conservative genetic interests, by insuring that trade is remained. I WROTE THE BOOK OF LAW TO MAKE THAT JUDGEMENT POSSIBLE. Ergo, I need to drive libertarians into roles as JUDGES of the LAW, under european high trust “commons” law, not semitic low trust “ghetto” law. And that is what my work does: I wrote THE LAW. The one law of reciprocity from which western civilization evolved and out-competed other civilizations in rates of adaptation and innovation.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 08:49:00 UTC

  • “Are you a right wing libertarian?”— Hard to answer that question any longer.

    —“Are you a right wing libertarian?”—

    Hard to answer that question any longer. I write on Testimonial (Complete Scientific) Truth; the natural law of reciprocity; nomocracy (rule of law) under that natural law; the uniqueness of western civlization (individual sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, judge-jury-law, and the resulting markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war). In effect the formal logic and science of cooperation that we call ‘social science’ written as ‘law’.

    “Libertarian” now refers unfortunately to Anarchism since it was usurped by the anarcho capitalists. And “Liberal” has been usurped by the american socialists. And I have lost nearly all my confidence in any form of democracy other than markets – and in doing so moved those markets into the houses of government, eliminating monopoly rule. So classical liberal is not available to me either.

    You would find my policy recommendations left of center, but my democratic recommendations right of center, and you probably wouldnt understand my economic work.

    But in the end result, all questions of politics devolve into Masculine Meritocratic, Capitalization, and Eugenics, versus Feminine Equalitarian, Consumption, and Dysgenics. In that sense I am an economic paleolibertarian and an normative paleoconservative in that it is impossible to both be intellectually honest, and sufficiently informed in economics and biology to hold any other proposition than we must pay the underclass to stop reproducing very soon if not immediately, and we must end all underclass immigration and reverse as much of it as possible.

    There is no other option other than ‘faith’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:26:00 UTC

  • THE COMPLETE PROGRAM The Cult of Nature (Religion) The Cult of our People (Mytho

    THE COMPLETE PROGRAM
    The Cult of Nature (Religion)
    The Cult of our People (Mythology)
    The Cult of the Militia (Physical)
    The Cult of Stoicism (Emotional)
    The Cult of the Law (Intellectual)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 15:12:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062000126149959681

  • I want a platform where I can openly discuss a revolution to restore the constit

    I want a platform where I can openly discuss a revolution to restore the constitution. On what platform is that possible?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:43:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/9040581340850338

  • Let’s be clear. I want a civil war. We need one. And within 18 months

    Let’s be clear. I want a civil war. We need one. And within 18 months.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:40:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061795961956167680

  • NOT QUITE RIGHT. BENEVOLENCE IS MADE BY LAW NOT BY ACCIDENT OR INTENT —“A Bene

    NOT QUITE RIGHT. BENEVOLENCE IS MADE BY LAW NOT BY ACCIDENT OR INTENT

    —“A Benevolent Dictator is the most efficient form of government”— Justin Glanville

    A benevolent dictator bound by natural law tested by an independent judicial ‘cult’ of the law, and defended by a militia of the same, is the most efficient form of government.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 14:29:00 UTC

  • CHRISTIAN (FEDERATED) MONARCHIES (RULE OF LAW KINGS) ARE THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL O

    CHRISTIAN (FEDERATED) MONARCHIES (RULE OF LAW KINGS) ARE THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL ORDER

    @Lord_Keynes2

    Monarchs have a very bad record. They engage in war and conquest, acquire multi-ethnic empires, become cosmopolitans, and then it all falls apart: e.g., Ottoman empire, Russian empire, Austro-Hungarian empire, etc.

    Replying to @Lord_Keynes2

    I notice you aren’t mentioning the german manorial states, the scandinavian, the french polish or italian….

    Replying to @Lord_Keynes2

    Empires capture trade routes. Monarchies captured productive land. Both centralize rents in exchange for increasing local economic velocity. Study of european castle distribution illustrates rather easily the exceptional relationship between martial+judicial and std of living.

    Replying to @Lord_Keynes2

    Ergo the issue is not empire nor monarchy, but ETHNICITY. ie: ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, and trading ethnocentricity for rents at the cost of multicultural conflict is a short term win at long term cost.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 11:25:00 UTC