Theme: Constitutional Order

  • UM. YOU WANT A PROPHET, OR EQUIVALENT? SORRY. I don’t want to appeal to anyone.

    UM. YOU WANT A PROPHET, OR EQUIVALENT? SORRY.

    I don’t want to appeal to anyone. I don’t want to be popular. I don’t even want attention. I want to present a constitution that solves real problems, and then foment a revolt in order to demand their solution. I am unimportant.

    There is NO REASON people need to undrestand propertarianism any more than quantum mechanics or algebraic geometry, or the body of extant law and its reasoning. The intellectual work is for intellectuals and jurists in defense of that constitution.

    There is however, every reason for COMMON people to fight for a better life and the end to political conflict and social strife.

    I only need to convince some number of them that this will solve the problems that they face. Because only a small number who will fight is necessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-20 12:37:00 UTC

  • OBJECTIVES —“Curts objective is civil war”– Curts objective is constitutional

    OBJECTIVES

    —“Curts objective is civil war”–

    Curts objective is constitutional reform, in order to save our people and our civilization, and quite possibly mankind.

    The threat of civil war is the only means to bring it about, just as the threat of civil war in the 60’s, and 30’s were the only means to bring it about.

    The more certain the war, the more rapid the capitulation of the state.

    The point is to make a war so certain and so frightening that the state capitulates and we implement the changes to the constitution restoring natural law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-20 10:29:00 UTC

  • “One Law. Zero Tolerance.”

    “One Law. Zero Tolerance.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 22:25:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1086751437877665793

  • “One Law. Zero Tolerance.”

    “One Law. Zero Tolerance.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 17:24:00 UTC

  • “I have a law degree and i still don’t understand.”–Shane Mark If it wasn’t exc

    —“I have a law degree and i still don’t understand.”–Shane Mark

    If it wasn’t excruciatingly difficult, someone would have done it before me. Instead, a host of intellectuals during the late 19th through mid 20th tried and failed. But since that time we’ve had computer science (existential) instead of mathematics (ideal), and cognitive science (existential) instead of psychology (pseudoscience), and economics (real) instead of sociology (pseudoscience). There are lots of shoulders of giants to stand upon in the late 20th and early 21st when I’m working.

    It’s possible to create strictly constructed law on one hand that is testable by computer software, and a chain of dependency that is testable by computer, and to provide the law, prosecutors, lawyers, judges, and the jury with a set of tests for truthful speech – which cannot be performed by computer.

    Law of tort is quite good really. Legislation and regulation are reasonably good in the anglo (common law) tradition. We just need these tools, universal standing in matters of the commons, thereby ending disintermediation by the state, and providing a via negativa means of competition (court) in addition to the via-positiva means of competition (markets).

    Now, increase the definition and scope of property (see property-in-toto) to the full suite of things that people act to invest in producing whether by expenditure of forgone opportunity, or expenditure of time, effort, or resources, (including manners, ethics, morals, norms, commons, capital et all) and it is very hard for special interests (and usurpers) to survive. And even more so, nearly impossible to seek rents (more on that another time.)

    – Eradicate false and ir-reciprocal commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational speech in the commons.

    – Restore libel and slander.

    – Prohibit baiting into moral hazard in the law.

    – Replace copyright with creative commons.

    – Eliminate consumer interest (yes, really, and it’s not hard).

    – Privatize (contract out) all bureaucratic functions.

    – Replace private pensions with public (they aren’t possible anyway in current and future economies)…. meaning adopt the singapore model of ‘involuntarily buying insurance to protect your peers from your late age poverty’.

    Much, more detail, but all of it is rather ordinary.

    I can’t write twenty pages here but just take it for granted that I’ve worked through these ideas in painful detail.

    We can depoliticize, de-propagandize, eliminate fraud and deceit in every aspect of public life, restore the civic society, halve the time people must work to pay off homes, drastically reduce the cost of education, and dozens of other great improvements and all it will do is end parasitism by the political, bureaucratic, and financial classes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 09:04:00 UTC

  • I don’t think you understand. The existing common law consists of that which the

    I don’t think you understand.

    The existing common law consists of that which the judiciary will decide, and the state will enforce under the presumption we are equals.

    The existing continental law consists of the presumption of a feudal difference between the state and the citizenry, and that the citizens are permitted that which is not prohibited or commanded.

    The existing and past soviet and islamic law, consists of the presumption of enslavement by the state or the priesthood’s false god, and the the limiting of one’s actions to that which is permitted.

    “The White Law” consists of that law of cooperation, the abridgement of which demands adjudication, and restitution, for us to refrain from extermination, enslavement, or enserfment.

    it is a via-negativa law. It is a law of those who are equal in sufficient agency to be granted agency by one another – with the rest of man, beast, plant, and matter to be defended against in the interests of our continued production of agency, and continued transcendence.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 13:05:00 UTC

  • 2) Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy. Ethnocentric cults the optimum i

    2) Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy. Ethnocentric cults the optimum intergenerational cults.
    3) I write law. The law is a via negativa. Markets can find via-positiva solutions that do not violate law – that is the function of the competition between markets and law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 00:22:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083156973573545984

    Reply addressees: @DataDistribute @MusaVaino @BenBurgis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083154649618751488


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083154649618751488

  • Those who will fight matter. Incentives to fight matter. A set of demands (const

    Those who will fight matter. Incentives to fight matter. A set of demands (constitution) that provides incentives, and satisfies demand, matters. Internet dweebs are negatively correlated with those who will fight. Uninformed opinion negatively correlated with calculus of motive.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 23:55:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083150214083559429

  • Rule of Law

    Rule of Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 22:59:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083136233272983552

    Reply addressees: @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083133413832486917


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083133413832486917

  • SIMPLE ANSWERS DEPARTMENT —“The Spanish empire was centrally run. The British

    SIMPLE ANSWERS DEPARTMENT

    —“The Spanish empire was centrally run. The British was based on free enterprise.”—Richard Hall

    The british empire was based upon rule of law, which results in free enterprise.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 15:56:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081942550641082370