(FB 1544796513 Timestamp) THE CONDITION OF WHITE AMERICANS by Joseph Smith Average people donât properly consider the philosophy of government, or spend the time they should on the cycles of history. What they do consider is that the average out of pocket cost for healthcare for a family is nearing $30k per year. Theyâve robbed us, theyâve ignored us, theyâve slandered and belittled and demeaned us. Theyâve flooded our cities with scabs to suppress wages, theyâve shipped our factories to third world slave states to knock a few pennies off the plastic junk at Walmart. They take our money and give it to the corporatists that collapse the global economy without any conditions, and then the conglomerates betray us anyway. Weâre told we have no culture at all, that weâre uniquely evil in the historical scope. And worst of all portrayed as the winners in the system imposed on us, as if weâre head and shoulders gifted artificially by the unbearable aggression levied upon us. Demonized day and night in the press, patronized and pathologized in media, harassed in the streets and in every institution our ancestors have constructed. Itâs so far beyond just a tax that to continue to exclaim itâs even the primary problem is to spit in our faces. Thank God the French have their yellow vests and their convictions. The Americans have nothing but their weed, video games, and muh constitution soliloquies.
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544808083 Timestamp) ANARCHISM OR RULE OF LAW (NOMOCRACY)? One cannot both advocate for a uniform definition of property, and argue for anarchy. Hence why I argue for nomocracy: the natural law of reciprocity = the law of tort = the law of property = discovered by the resolution of demonstrated conflict = decided by tests of involuntary transfer.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544807368 Timestamp) IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW —“I follow Curt, but most of what heâs says seems like common sense.”— A Friend (from Chat) So yes. It is f–cking common sense. The difference is that I defend that common sense both logically and scientifically, because what is ‘common sense’ to you ‘is not common’. I made a Law of what you consider ‘common sense’. It is that law, the constitution that embodies it, and the logic and science in defense of it, that make it open to utility in persuasion, resistance to falsification, and institutional implementation, rather than simply a difference of moral bias and condition. I wrote our law. No one ever did that before. We just ‘do it’. For thousands of years. Individual Sovereignty, Truth, Duty (and charity), The Natural law of Reciprocity (Tort), the Sovereignty Judge and the Jury, and markets in everything that result. The Militia of a distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544805739 Timestamp) A RELIGION WITHOUT CLERGY – A MILITIA RATHER THAN ARMY – A GOVERNMENT OF LAW NOT MEN. —“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government” and “[i]n every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”— Thomas Jefferson —“The Distributed Dictatorship of Sovereign Men”— Eli Harman
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544808083 Timestamp) ANARCHISM OR RULE OF LAW (NOMOCRACY)? One cannot both advocate for a uniform definition of property, and argue for anarchy. Hence why I argue for nomocracy: the natural law of reciprocity = the law of tort = the law of property = discovered by the resolution of demonstrated conflict = decided by tests of involuntary transfer.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544807368 Timestamp) IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW —“I follow Curt, but most of what heâs says seems like common sense.”— A Friend (from Chat) So yes. It is f–cking common sense. The difference is that I defend that common sense both logically and scientifically, because what is ‘common sense’ to you ‘is not common’. I made a Law of what you consider ‘common sense’. It is that law, the constitution that embodies it, and the logic and science in defense of it, that make it open to utility in persuasion, resistance to falsification, and institutional implementation, rather than simply a difference of moral bias and condition. I wrote our law. No one ever did that before. We just ‘do it’. For thousands of years. Individual Sovereignty, Truth, Duty (and charity), The Natural law of Reciprocity (Tort), the Sovereignty Judge and the Jury, and markets in everything that result. The Militia of a distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544805739 Timestamp) A RELIGION WITHOUT CLERGY – A MILITIA RATHER THAN ARMY – A GOVERNMENT OF LAW NOT MEN. —“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government” and “[i]n every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”— Thomas Jefferson —“The Distributed Dictatorship of Sovereign Men”— Eli Harman
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545055782 Timestamp) BUT, THAT’S WHAT LAW MEANS —“It’s the law because it’s the law, accept it” seems like absolutism— Hue Whitman That’s what Laws of Nature(unconscious, deterministic) and Natural Law (conscious, volitionary) mean: they are DESCRIPTIVE. You cannot violate the laws of nature but you can manipulate them. You can violate the natural laws, and pay the consequences. The natural world already calculates its optimum, and we ‘cheat’ it. The natural law is something else men cheat. However, the optimum method of human evolution is the elimination of cheating (parasitism). If you eliminate all parasitism you end up with natural law. If you do not then you don’t. That’s what “Law” means “Decidable” in scientific language, and which means “Absolute” in archaic moral language. We have ‘appropriated’ the term ‘law’ in science, and reframed the original meaning of law as the series Findings of Common Law (Court), Command(Ruler), Legislation(Government), Regulation(Bureaucracy). The Continental system of law is different in this hierarchy since the continent uses Roman and Napoleonic law, and the state is separate from the people, whereas in Anglo (Scandinavian) Civilization, the Rulers are just current members of the people. This subtle difference is profound in consequence between the continental and intercontinental (anglo) civilizations.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545055782 Timestamp) BUT, THAT’S WHAT LAW MEANS —“It’s the law because it’s the law, accept it” seems like absolutism— Hue Whitman That’s what Laws of Nature(unconscious, deterministic) and Natural Law (conscious, volitionary) mean: they are DESCRIPTIVE. You cannot violate the laws of nature but you can manipulate them. You can violate the natural laws, and pay the consequences. The natural world already calculates its optimum, and we ‘cheat’ it. The natural law is something else men cheat. However, the optimum method of human evolution is the elimination of cheating (parasitism). If you eliminate all parasitism you end up with natural law. If you do not then you don’t. That’s what “Law” means “Decidable” in scientific language, and which means “Absolute” in archaic moral language. We have ‘appropriated’ the term ‘law’ in science, and reframed the original meaning of law as the series Findings of Common Law (Court), Command(Ruler), Legislation(Government), Regulation(Bureaucracy). The Continental system of law is different in this hierarchy since the continent uses Roman and Napoleonic law, and the state is separate from the people, whereas in Anglo (Scandinavian) Civilization, the Rulers are just current members of the people. This subtle difference is profound in consequence between the continental and intercontinental (anglo) civilizations.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545084448 Timestamp) Religions, Moneylending, and Commerce are universalist, but Militias,Armies,Kings, and the Law are Nationalist.