Theme: Constitutional Order

  • It doesn’t matter. The congress doesn’t have that power. 😉

    It doesn’t matter. The congress doesn’t have that power. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 23:14:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215411524824633345

    Reply addressees: @tavareskjones

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215407859795746817


    IN REPLY TO:

    @tavareskjones

    #BREAKING: House passes measure seeking to limit Trump’s military actions against Iran. https://t.co/2dfA3NXR59

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215407859795746817

  • You can use an Alinsky tactic to personalize a movement – but we all see you for

    You can use an Alinsky tactic to personalize a movement – but we all see you for what you are: the enemy of those of us that elected a representative our our intent to end the imperial USA as an agent of world cosmopolitanism, and to gut the state that has destroyed middle class.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 20:06:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215364127612461056

    Reply addressees: @QuintusCurtius

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215297984654729216


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215297984654729216

  • constitution work is … painful and slow right now

    constitution work is … painful and slow right now.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 16:09:00 UTC

  • NO, YOU DON”T GET IT I don’t get to ‘appeal’ to markets. The law doesn’t do that

    NO, YOU DON”T GET IT
    I don’t get to ‘appeal’ to markets. The law doesn’t do that. We use the law to create policy that appeals to markets WITHIN the natural law.

    I CANT compromise without… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=549984685598426&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 03:03:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215106700803563521

  • “The dissident right wing is split on Aristotle and Plato. You being an Aristote

    —“The dissident right wing is split on Aristotle and Plato. You being an Aristotelian and someone like Richard Spencer being a Platonist. Save the West with science and law for the Aristotelian vs Save the West with justification and idealism for the Platonist.”—Clown Baby @ClownBa73413423

    Correct. Aristotelian < Platonist < Theologian. The three grammars of cognitive development. Empathic, Narrative, Theological > Rational, Ideal, Platonist > Empirical Measurement Aristotelian. The brain evolves in that order. It’s not a mystery why we preserve the use all three. But why don’t other civ’s?

    Feel drag along (Comfort) – Empirical Measurement Aristotelian

    … Reason sell (Explain) – Rational, Ideal, Platonist

    … … Empirical tell (Decide) – Empathic, Narrative, Theological


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 08:04:00 UTC

  • THE END OF DEMOCRACY? OR A SECOND DARK AGE.

    [W]e can save democracy in some form if we modify the franchise and create houses for the classes again, and give women a separate house. But (as Samuel Huntington warned) democracy cannot survive Islam. Between (1) granting women the franchise, (2) postwar Jewish marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-denialism and (3) Islamic religion-of-continuous-war-and-conquest by continuous undermining, without Monarchy as a judge of last resort and without our traditional law of sovereignty in ‘Inviolable Book’ form, and without a Civilization’s State religion we are not able to resist (defeat) the ease at which women’s intuition for undermining, the Jewish and Muslim strategy of undermining can be combined to destroy the only civilization to drag mankind out of the perpetual dark age of Abrahamic Ignorance and Deceit. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity cost us all the great civilizations of the ancient world: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Persian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, The Indus region of India, And was stopped only because it consumes whatever people adopt it, and reduces them to perpetual externalization of inner conflict through blame of others, whereas every other religious system provides mindfulness within the self. Western civilization uniquely created continuous innovation and adaptation by the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self all favor others (the polity) in exchange for status, and status produces mindfulness by existential, demonstrated, evidentiary, constructive means. Sovereignty requires reciprocity, reciprocity requires the natural law of tort, jury, and court of peers, and cooperation is limited to markets in every domain of life regardless of station. Markets in every domain of life produce the most rapid means of adaptation. Adaptation of the law by continuous competition in court produces the most rapid means of political adaptation. material heroism by the use of technology, contract and maneuver, produce the most rapid means of technological adaptation. It is this heroism and sovereignty that came west into Europe with the indo-European expansion. It’s that heroism and sovereignty that made Greece and Rome. And it’s that heroism and sovereignty that rescued us from the last Dark Age. And it’s that heroism and sovereignty that built the modern world of plenty. It was Semitic false promise of a monopoly underclass desirable for women and slaves, and the forcible imposition of superstition, by a priesthood selling lies that replaced a martial aristocracy demonstrating truth, and a failure to constrain roman expansion to the rate at which people could be civilized into a martial and middle-class society that created the opportunity for a dark age, and the vast numbers of Muslim raiders that destroyed civilizations, arts, knowledge, and trade routes that produced the First Semitic Dark age. But it is our failure to learn from that experience and to change from western market tolerance to western monopoly warfare against these enemies that threatens a second Semitic dark age. The Group’s strategy was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx, Freud, Boas), Math with pseudo-mathematics (Cantor, Bohr), reason with sophistry(Derrida), class and gender cooperation with conflict(Adorno, Friedan), Heroism with Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Just as they had replaced the west’s ‘book’ of Homer, Our Aristocratic Hero of Achilles, our Family of the Gods, and our rational law, empiricism, and reason with the Semitic ‘books’, the victim-hero of jews and Jesus persecution, the family of Jewish heroes, the apostles and saints, supernatural law, supernaturalism, and the great Semitic deceit using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophistry to avoid argument and truth), critique (disapproval, straw-manning, and poisoning the well to avoid argument and truth), hiding under voluntary choice, plausible deniability for the hazard and unfalsifiability of promises to create not innovation and production, evolution and transcendence, but devolution, ignorance, submission, consumption, destruction, and dysgenia. Their group strategy like the female’s is Anti-civilization: Their Pursuit of a Second Dark Age. Undermining and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth. There is no difference between Jewish invention of false promises in ancient world, Christian destruction of the European ancient world, and Islamic destruction of the rest of the civilizations of the ancient world, and the Jewish invention of false promises of denial, sophistry, and pseudoscience in Marxism in economics, Freudianism in psychology, boasianism in anthropology, Cantorian-Bohr math, frankfurt in cultural marxism, postmodern relativism and denialism, in academy, undermining rule of law in the courts, and Marxist, feminist, postmodern identitarian conflict generation under pretense that markets are not the only possible means of cooperation. They literally have tried to destroy truth, reason, and reason and cooperation by exchange in every possible dimension of human reason, knowledge, and cooperation. The Hindus produced wisdom literature in myth. Chinese produced wisdom literature and reason. The Europeans produced wisdom literature in empiricism. But the Semites produced a wisdom literature of lies. Why? Hermes and the cart of lies. Why did Semites invent lying? Likely Because professional (huckster) religion started in Anatolia-Mesopotamia, and it ameliorated the differences between very different tribes at the intersection of trade routes across four continents. The cure, of course, is to produce our own ‘Book’ that canonizes the group strategy of western civilization’s continuous innovation and adaptation – the civilization that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early, death, and the status of victims of a nature all but deliberately hostile to human life. That book would state our history, our strategy, our law, and our method of reasoning in the language of our Natural Religion: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. And it would, as do all books, set the terms by which none may trespass in thought, display, word, or deed – regardless of rank, nation, race or excuse. Heroism and Man for the Aristocracy, Stoicism and Nature for the able, Christianity for the vulnerable. That is the end purpose of the P-law project. And a revolution and restoration and renaissance of our civilization. And an end to Semitic dark ages in European alliance with Sinic, Hindu, and African civilizations will bring it about. Truth can win if men choose. It is just our choice.

  • THE END OF DEMOCRACY? OR A SECOND DARK AGE.

    [W]e can save democracy in some form if we modify the franchise and create houses for the classes again, and give women a separate house. But (as Samuel Huntington warned) democracy cannot survive Islam. Between (1) granting women the franchise, (2) postwar Jewish marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-denialism and (3) Islamic religion-of-continuous-war-and-conquest by continuous undermining, without Monarchy as a judge of last resort and without our traditional law of sovereignty in ‘Inviolable Book’ form, and without a Civilization’s State religion we are not able to resist (defeat) the ease at which women’s intuition for undermining, the Jewish and Muslim strategy of undermining can be combined to destroy the only civilization to drag mankind out of the perpetual dark age of Abrahamic Ignorance and Deceit. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity cost us all the great civilizations of the ancient world: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Persian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, The Indus region of India, And was stopped only because it consumes whatever people adopt it, and reduces them to perpetual externalization of inner conflict through blame of others, whereas every other religious system provides mindfulness within the self. Western civilization uniquely created continuous innovation and adaptation by the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self all favor others (the polity) in exchange for status, and status produces mindfulness by existential, demonstrated, evidentiary, constructive means. Sovereignty requires reciprocity, reciprocity requires the natural law of tort, jury, and court of peers, and cooperation is limited to markets in every domain of life regardless of station. Markets in every domain of life produce the most rapid means of adaptation. Adaptation of the law by continuous competition in court produces the most rapid means of political adaptation. material heroism by the use of technology, contract and maneuver, produce the most rapid means of technological adaptation. It is this heroism and sovereignty that came west into Europe with the indo-European expansion. It’s that heroism and sovereignty that made Greece and Rome. And it’s that heroism and sovereignty that rescued us from the last Dark Age. And it’s that heroism and sovereignty that built the modern world of plenty. It was Semitic false promise of a monopoly underclass desirable for women and slaves, and the forcible imposition of superstition, by a priesthood selling lies that replaced a martial aristocracy demonstrating truth, and a failure to constrain roman expansion to the rate at which people could be civilized into a martial and middle-class society that created the opportunity for a dark age, and the vast numbers of Muslim raiders that destroyed civilizations, arts, knowledge, and trade routes that produced the First Semitic Dark age. But it is our failure to learn from that experience and to change from western market tolerance to western monopoly warfare against these enemies that threatens a second Semitic dark age. The Group’s strategy was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx, Freud, Boas), Math with pseudo-mathematics (Cantor, Bohr), reason with sophistry(Derrida), class and gender cooperation with conflict(Adorno, Friedan), Heroism with Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Just as they had replaced the west’s ‘book’ of Homer, Our Aristocratic Hero of Achilles, our Family of the Gods, and our rational law, empiricism, and reason with the Semitic ‘books’, the victim-hero of jews and Jesus persecution, the family of Jewish heroes, the apostles and saints, supernatural law, supernaturalism, and the great Semitic deceit using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophistry to avoid argument and truth), critique (disapproval, straw-manning, and poisoning the well to avoid argument and truth), hiding under voluntary choice, plausible deniability for the hazard and unfalsifiability of promises to create not innovation and production, evolution and transcendence, but devolution, ignorance, submission, consumption, destruction, and dysgenia. Their group strategy like the female’s is Anti-civilization: Their Pursuit of a Second Dark Age. Undermining and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth. There is no difference between Jewish invention of false promises in ancient world, Christian destruction of the European ancient world, and Islamic destruction of the rest of the civilizations of the ancient world, and the Jewish invention of false promises of denial, sophistry, and pseudoscience in Marxism in economics, Freudianism in psychology, boasianism in anthropology, Cantorian-Bohr math, frankfurt in cultural marxism, postmodern relativism and denialism, in academy, undermining rule of law in the courts, and Marxist, feminist, postmodern identitarian conflict generation under pretense that markets are not the only possible means of cooperation. They literally have tried to destroy truth, reason, and reason and cooperation by exchange in every possible dimension of human reason, knowledge, and cooperation. The Hindus produced wisdom literature in myth. Chinese produced wisdom literature and reason. The Europeans produced wisdom literature in empiricism. But the Semites produced a wisdom literature of lies. Why? Hermes and the cart of lies. Why did Semites invent lying? Likely Because professional (huckster) religion started in Anatolia-Mesopotamia, and it ameliorated the differences between very different tribes at the intersection of trade routes across four continents. The cure, of course, is to produce our own ‘Book’ that canonizes the group strategy of western civilization’s continuous innovation and adaptation – the civilization that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early, death, and the status of victims of a nature all but deliberately hostile to human life. That book would state our history, our strategy, our law, and our method of reasoning in the language of our Natural Religion: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. And it would, as do all books, set the terms by which none may trespass in thought, display, word, or deed – regardless of rank, nation, race or excuse. Heroism and Man for the Aristocracy, Stoicism and Nature for the able, Christianity for the vulnerable. That is the end purpose of the P-law project. And a revolution and restoration and renaissance of our civilization. And an end to Semitic dark ages in European alliance with Sinic, Hindu, and African civilizations will bring it about. Truth can win if men choose. It is just our choice.

  • SIGH —“you should read….(law)…” Terry O’Brien: 1) Yes of course i’ve read

    SIGH

    —“you should read….(law)…”

    Terry O’Brien:

    1) Yes of course i’ve read those works (see my reading list and our library). Although I tend to prefer Milsom’s treatment of the law.

    2) You’re confusing errors with definitions. that’s ok.

    P logic and law depend on disambiguation by enumeration, operationalization, and serialization, to prevent errors of inference and categorization and this results in everting from clarification to redefinition to neologism.

    We use this technique to create a value neutral universally commensurable language and logic of testimony

    3) Tort means ‘trespass’ and is a violation of demonstrated interest – or what we codify as property. While all peoples vary in the degree of suppression of trespass given their division of labor, level of development, family structure, terms of inheritance, investment in commons, and level of corruption (trust), all people resolve disputes by demonstrated interests at least within the limits of defection.

    4) What is the basis of decidability in Common Law (the abusive term used today that means ‘whatever we can get away with’), Common law (as etymologically evolved) in judge discovered findings of law, Traditional germanic law and its practice, ancient european traditional law, the commonalities of greek and roman law, and what we can linguistically and archeologically determine from proto-germanic west indo european law? (Sovereignty and Reciprocity, testimony and jury.)

    5) Where did (western) evidentiary reason, evidentiary empiricism, and evidentiary science evolve, at what points, by what authors, in what professions?

    So, if we look at vernacular, temporal, periods, ages, or across all of european history since the indo-european expansion, and compare those internal consistencies with other civilizations we winnow down the number of constant relations. This degree of resolution in traditions of decidability, just as the degree of resolution in subatomic, atomic, chemical, biochemical, cellular, expose local and continuous general rules.

    Ergo the common law tradition predates greece and rome. And it is rome and napoleonic france that did it damage, just like it was christian rome, revolutionary france, and postmodern France(with help from the jewish counter-englightenment of marx, boas, freud, cantor, adorno) that undermined that law – causing the continent and the anglosphere to diverge with the anglosphere retaining the via negativa tradition, and the french-continental reverting to via-positiva and causing the failure (impossibility) of the european project.

    The origin of our civilization like all civilizations especially after the Axial Age (restoration after the bronze age collapse), is captured in our group strategy and our law that must survive within it. That law and the ‘metaphysics’ (paradigms of decidability) are the origin of the commonality across time.

    Why did the greeks go through the great change of socrates, plato, Aristotle, and alexander? Why did the greeks romans and the British use a different strategy from the Mesopotamians and the Chinese and the Hindus? Why did greeks work with geometry reason and divination, and why did Mesopotamians work with algebra theology and astrology?

    Whatever group strategy we had, whatever social order that was required of it, and whatever traditions, customs, law and mythos that we had around 900bc at the latests, was continuously reinforced by competition with others. And there are 500 dead gods in the record for those that failed.

    Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Thang, Evidence, Testimony, chieftain > Law, Jury, Senate king > Law, jury, house, senate, emperor

    Because markets are the only means of cooperation and dispute resolution under sovereignty.

    And because only contract is possible for people who required a voluntary entrepreneurial military, using metallurgy, wheel, horse, maneuver, to defeat superior numbers.

    There is a reason for military epistemology, metallurgical epistemology, and our legal epistemology.

    Our origins.

    “What can I testify to under realism, naturalism, and operationalism that is internally consistent, externally correspondent, operationally possible, and narratively coherent?”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 11:07:00 UTC

  • THE END OF DEMOCRACY? We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franch

    THE END OF DEMOCRACY?

    We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franchise and create houses for the classes again, and give women a separate house. But (as Samuel Huntington warned) democracy cannot survive Islam. Between (1) granting women the franchise, (2) postwar jewish marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-denialism and (3) Islamic religion-of-continuous-war-and-conquest by continuous undermining, without Monarchy as a judge of last resort and without our traditional law of sovereignty in ‘Inviolable Book’ form, and without a Civilization’s State religion we are not able to resist (defeat) the ease at which women’s intuition for undermining, the jewish and muslim strategy of undermining can be combined to destroy the only civilization to drag mankind out of the perpetual dark age of Abrahamic Ignorance and Deceit. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity cost us all the great civilizations of the ancient world: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Persian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, The Indus region of India, And was stopped only because it consumes whatever people adopt it, and reduces them to perpetual externalization of inner conflict through blame of others, whereas every other religious system provides mindfulness within the self.

    Western civilization uniquely created continuous innovation and adaptation by the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self all favor others (the polity) in exchange for status, and status produces mindfulness by existential, demonstrated, evidentiary, constructive means.

    Sovereignty requires reciprocity, reciprocity requires the natural law of tort, jury, and court of peers, and cooperation is limited to markets in every domain of life regardless of station. Markets in every domain of life produce the most rapid means of adaptation. Adaptation of the law by continuous competition in court produces the most rapid means of political adaptation. material heroism by the use of technology, contract and maneuver, produce the most rapid means of technological adaptation.

    It is this heroism and sovereignty that came west into europe with the indo-european expansion. It’s that heroism and sovereignty that made Greece and rome.

    It was semitic false promise of a monopoly underclass desirable for women and slaves, and the forcible imposition of superstition, by a priesthood selling lies that replaced a martial aristocracy demonstrating truth, and a failure to constrain roman expansion to the rate at which people could be civilized into a martial and middle class society that created the opportunity for a dark age, and the vast numbers of muslim raiders that destroyed civilizations, arts, knowledge, and trade routes that produced the First Semitic Dark age.

    But it is our failure to learn from that experience and to change from western market tolerance to western monopoly warfare against these enemies that threatens a second semitic dark age.

    The Group’s Strategy was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx,Freud,Boas), Math with pseudo-mathematics (Cantor, Bohr), reason with sophistry(Derrida), class and gender cooperation with conflict(Adorno, Friedan), Heroism with Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Just as they had replaced the west’s ‘book’ of Homer, Our Aristocratic Hero of Achilles, our Family of the Gods, and our rational law, empiricism, and reason with the semitic ‘books’, the victim-hero of jews and jesus persecution, the family of jewish heroes, the apostles and saints, supernatural law, supernaturalism, and the great semitic deceit using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophistry to avoid argument and truth), critique (disapproval, straw manning, and poisoning the well to avoid argument and truth), hiding under voluntary choice, plausible deniability for the hazard and unfalsifiability of promises to create not innovation and production, evolution and transcendence, but devolution, ignorance, submission, consumption, destruction and and dysgenia. Their group strategy like the female’s is Anti-civilization: Their Pursuit of a Second Dark Age.

    Undermining and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth.

    There is no difference between jewish invention of false promises in ancient world, christian destruction of the the european ancient world, and islamic destruction of the rest of the civilizations of the ancient world, and the jewish invention of false promises of denial, sophistry, and pseudoscience in Marxism in economics, fruedianism in psychology, boasianism in anthorpology, cantorian-bohr math, freankfurt in cultural marxism, postmodern relativism and denialism, in adademy, undermining rule of law in the courts, and marxist, feminist, postmodern identitarian conflict generation under pretense that markets are not the only possible means of cooperation. They literally have tried to destroy truth, reason, and reason and cooperation by exchange in every possible dimension of human reason, knowledge, and cooperation.

    The hindus produced wisdom literature in myth. Chinese produced wisdom literature and reason. The europeans produced wisdom literature in empiricism. But the semites produced a wisdom literature of lies. Why? Hermes and the cart of lies. Why did Semites invent lying? Likely Because professional (huckster) religion started in Anatolia-Mesopotamia, and it ameliorated the differences between very different tribes at the intersection of trade routes across four continents.

    The cure of course is to produce our own ‘Book’ that canonizes the group strategy of western civilization’s continuous innovation and adaptation – the civilization that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early, death, and the status of victims of a nature all but deliberately hostile to human life.

    That book would state our history, our strategy, our law, and our method of reasoning in the language of our Natural Religion: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. And it would, as do all books, set the terms by which none may trespass in thought, display, word, or deed – regardless of rank, nation, race or excuse. Heroism and Man for the Aristocracy, Stoicism and Nature for the able, Christianity for the vulnerable.

    That is the end purpose of the P-law project. And a revolution and restoration and renaissance of our civilization. And an end to semitic dark ages in European alliance with Sinic, Hindu, and African civilizations will bring it about.

    Truth can win if men choose.

    It is just our choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 09:48:00 UTC

  • THE MAIN PROPERTARIAN INNOVATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS THAT COMPLETE WESTERN LAW A

    THE MAIN PROPERTARIAN INNOVATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS THAT COMPLETE WESTERN LAW AND ARISTOTELIAN EPISTEMOLOGY.

    by Alain Dwight

    My current copy/paste of what is P is pretty much a break down at the narrative level:

    Here’s what I think the main Propertarian innovations/clarifications are that complete western (common/tort) law and Aristotelian epistemology.

    1 – Testimonilaism: The tests you can use to attempt to falsify a claim and truth as real rather an ideal, meaning truth is an adjective meaning “claim I can warranty has survived all means of falsification known to man”

    Link:

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/01/14/what-does-truth-mean-and-what-is-its-adjective-form/

    2 – Law as descriptive (framed as the science of co-operation and agency): retaliation and high trust can be deterministically predicted based on measuring reciprocity and impositions against property-en-toto. Errosion of trust erodes social norms and this cascades down to the rest of commons required to accumulate agency and retain sovereignty.

    Natural law says “if you do this your group will fail.” Common/tort law is men saying “we’re not going to let you do this because we refuse to be a failed group.”

    3 – Property-en-toto: all investments acquired without violating reciprocity that a person is willing and able to defend (whereas certain forms of damage against normative and informational commons were exploitable loopholes in tort law – hence we see hte industrialization of professional deception)

    4 – Reciprocity as deterministic: reciprocity will be exchanged by co-operation when interactions are “productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntarily exchanged, and free of imposition upon others by externality.” Otherwise reciprocity will be exchanged by means of conflict.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 20:29:00 UTC