Theme: Constitutional Order

Dear i/o.
A little chastisement:

We don’t live in a Democracy. By design. Because they always fail by a race to totalitarianism, civil war, and collapse.

Instead, by design, in deliberate institutional, procedural, and aesthetic imitation of Rome, thankfully elucidated by Gibbon, albeit with traditional common germanic law, thankfully codified as English common law by Blackstone, we live in a Republic, under rule of law, under common law, limited by the natural law, and limited by commonality in court and concurrency in voting and legislation, altogether largely codified in both the Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights, where we elect, by tests of concurrency, representatives representing the population (house, state localities (people)), of the states (senate(state legislatures)), and of the parties (electoral college (nobility)) – and somewhat foolishly have opened the franchise to those who do not demonstrate loyalty or responsibility for it’s preservation.

Our founders left us the most scientific form of government ever produced by man, with all but six major holes in the constitution – six holes that have left open the door for sedition against it during the twentieth century.

The question is whether, by trying to produce a democracy, hostile interests, have undermined our culture, our demographics, values, norms, traditions, our institutions, our common law, our concurrent legislation, our constitution, our rule of law, and it’s foundation on natural law (of cooperation).

The answer is yes. By design. Between the movement of class marxists to the states converting to cultural marxism and then race marxism, and finding sympathy among white women, who could be sold education in indoctrination, and were more open to sedition and organization against our civilization than the underclasses were to communism.

If you adhere to the fallacy that populations are equal, that sexes are equal, that cultures are equal, that religions are equal and that a heterogeneity of such can be governed without the same tyranny that led to the death of the Roman republic and its eventual fall, then you are too incompetent to hold a position on the subject, too incompetent to speak in public of it, and certainly to incompetent to participate in political franchise.

At some point, your naive and foolish optimism that leads to the tyranny you so comfortably advance in your ignorance, must be offset by men of responsibility and competency, by force if necessary, out of self defense alone, but not just for self, or kin, or progeny, but for humanity – as we are the only people on this earth so far capable of demonstrating the competency necessary to liv with such correspondence and consistency to the natural law aw of cooperation – and in doing so, in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, dragging ignorant superstitious incompetent stagnating or devolving mankind oug of its ignorance, superstition, low-trust, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early death, and victimization by the man and vicissitudes of a nature that biologically, climatologically, geologically, seeks to exterminate us with disturbing regularity in a universe that is a vast hostile irradiated wasteland uncaring for our existence and ignorant of it.

Cheers
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @eyeslasho