Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Simple solution: if you move between states you cannot vote for twelve years ( a

    Simple solution: if you move between states you cannot vote for twelve years ( at all). Revoke all voting for those who moved between states in the past twelve (20) years. If you immigrate your family cannot vote for three generations. No stealing and spending down of cultural capital. That’s how it’s done. Simplest solution, revoke all citizenship, voting, and all benefits, back to 1967.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 09:36:00 UTC

  • What outcome is that? Restoration of rule of law, of constitution, civilization,

    What outcome is that? Restoration of rule of law, of constitution, civilization, continued transcendence of western man, and the suppression of false promise, baiting into hazard, financialization, propaganda, legislation from the bench, politicization, and islamization?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 16:41:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250464206681509889

    Reply addressees: @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250419209416237065

  • I mean truth-before-face, rule of law, jury and testimony, independent judiciary

    I mean truth-before-face, rule of law, jury and testimony, independent judiciary, science, medicine, industry, and technology you pimple-dicked sheep beg, borrow and steal from us. … We did more in 400 years in the ancient world and 400 years in the modern than you did in 3000.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 14:46:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250435267086839809

    Reply addressees: @healingbyhenry @sunkiisss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250420702995308547

  • I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders, the british constitution,

    I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders, the british constitution, the common law, the european development of rule of law of common law, the germanic law, and the western indo european law of the ancients and their predecessors.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 13:33:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250417079200735233

    Reply addressees: @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250416077844119553


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes Here, in the USA, taking care of an ailing parent rather than putting her in a home, he shows up to fight in virginia, educates others one how our civilization was undermined, writes a reformation of the constitution to restore and preserve it, works within the law – until then.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1250416077844119553

  • BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND

    BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND A BODY OF LAW

    (and frankly y’all got nobody else at all other than me with anything to offer.)

    —“Curt: Don’t you realize that what you are trying to do is start a political movement? P must be a political movement if it’s ever going to get off the ground. You can talk all you want about it being the final conclusion to logic and science. You know what? That and $4 will get you a cup from Starbucks. I would personally like to see some P principles in our constitution. But it ain’t gonna happen if you don’t build constituencies. And the number one group that could be in your corner is conservative Christians. But that isn’t going to happen because you are too dogmatic about the folly of Christianity. I am offering you some advice. Delete all negative references to Christianity in your writings. Stop telling Christians they are foolish, failures, weak, arrogant, disobedient and wasting their time believing in the fake man in the sky. You are trying to build a political movement (herd) whether you choose to admit it or not. Who is going to be followers of the P movement? Marxists? Socialists? Antifa? The leftist academic elitists? The deep state? The parasitic democrats dependent on government transfer payments, single mothers, millions of recent immigrants, the AOC & Bernie millennials? No. It’s Euro Americans of which a huge number are Christian. And you’re going to piss them off. You are NOT going to gain any traction by alienating what should be your core constituency. You can be self-righteous in your P dogma and lose. Or you can try to win by forging alliances with those who can help you move forward. Choose wisely.”— Herod Bedford

    Go to my twitter page. What does the pinned tweet say?

    Here. I’m going to post it below for you.

    My response is that instead you stop making excuses for the truth in order to burying your head in the sand using faith as an excuse. You can never have a theocracy. You can only have trifunctionalism, or you can disappear from this earth.

    Truth and Law vs Wisdom and Faith.

    I’m not looking for a majority, any more than were the founders. I’m looking for 1% or less of the population that will fight to restore the constitution and our civilization without pandering to anyone, whether christian, or fascist, or marxist-socialist-postmodernist-feminist, or anything in between – we are made from rule of law and christianity, fascism, liberalism, and leftism are all privileged cults of fantasy that are possible because the few – the very few – were willing to pick up, carry arms, sally forth, and fight to preserve them despite cowards like you.

    Either your civilization and its operating system of law comes first, or you are an enemy of our people. If your faith is before your people, or you are the enemy of our people. if it comes before our law, our people, and our civilization then you are the enemy of your people. Your privilege of faith is due to our civilization, and our law, and the truth within our law that you deny in order to maintain your faith.

    Christian self congratulatory delusions are only possible, as is judaism, because real men fight for the law to have the freedom to provide you with that self indulgence.

    The few strong, reciprocal, and brave, do not need the approval of the many weak, irreciprocal, and cowardly.

    So grow up, man up, shut up, and fight for our law.

    Because the survival of your faith is predicated on it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 10:11:00 UTC

  • Which is what I do. I update the written constitution of adams, jefferson, and t

    Which is what I do. I update the written constitution of adams, jefferson, and the founters, which was an update of the unwritten constitution of britain, which was an update of the unwritten law of anglo saxons, which was an update of the germanic common law.  … Rule of Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 21:29:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250174384049991684

    Reply addressees: @jim_rutt @_Indirection

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250170009885855745

  • Most of these maps can vary. The point being that territorial empires necessary

    Most of these maps can vary. The point being that territorial empires necessary for financing warfare during the industrial revolution are now impediments to local preference and power distance.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 17:15:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250110479520931843

    Reply addressees: @richardamnson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250109912430063616

  • enumerate those rights and define sufficient food, and enumerate what they are r

    enumerate those rights and define sufficient food, and enumerate what they are required to do in exchange and you have a constitution. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:53:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250089699819094016

    Reply addressees: @eruditenights

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249776466365009927

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE. In this constitution, all rights and obligations un

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/OUR NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE.

    In this constitution, all rights and obligations under all conditions are enumerated in “Article III – Rights and Obligations” – and it is this article and it’s structure that improves upon the bill of rights by organizing and consolidating rights so that they are all but impossible to violate. The failure to enumerate rights using this formal structure is why they were so easy to circumvent.

    The right and obligation for defense is under “Section IV – Reciprocity in Defense”.

    The primary work effort missing from this Article is the changes in rights and obligations under war or windfall. This will be an innovation in articulating the law where it hasn’t been articulated before. But that shouldn’t interfere with your discussion.

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/Updated Apr 13, 2020, 11:03 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 11:03:00 UTC

  • Learning P Focus on: (a) The west’s group strategy of a universal militia, sovre

    Learning P

    Focus on:

    (a) The west’s group strategy of a universal militia, sovreignty, reciprocity, markets and natural law.

    (b) Our P-amendments to the constitution to restore the constitution, our way of life, and western civlization.

    (c) the basics of reciprocity and testimony

    (d) How to understand and defeat the sophisms and deceits.

    Everything else is technical.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-12 14:33:00 UTC