Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Disambiguation of Government (Bankruptcy)

    Disambiguation of Government (Bankruptcy) https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/24/disambiguation-of-government-bankruptcy/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 18:19:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253750547536060416

  • Disambiguation of Government (Bankruptcy)

    [D]isambiguation:

    1. Military > State > Government > Commons > institutions-organization
    2. Rule of Law > Law > Courts > Contracts > Biz-trade
    3. Strategy+Tradition > Religion+Education+Academy+Media > Families/Consumers > People-consumption

    State (corporation holding assets) 1. Federal State -> Federal Government 2. … Regional State -> Regional Government 3. … … Territorial: County Corporation -> County Government 4. … … Market: Local Corporation -> Local Government If a state declares bankruptcy the creditors get screwed all or partly. The state has demonstrated incompetence in the management of state affairs, and then the creditors will seek higher interest rates in the future, and after a cycle or two governments ‘learn’ partly because they have evidence of the consequences after bankruptcy and no evidence prior to bankruptcy – just as we now have evidence of immigration, diversity, monetary policy, and democracy – evidence of failure seems to be necessary to prevent repetition of human hubris. The state as a monopoly on violence is evidently false because it was a construct of the westphalian peace. At present it’s falsified, just as it was prior to the westphalian peace. In other words it was always false. The state is a corporation. The institutions organize the use of assets. The owners of that corporation consist of a small number of people willing to use sufficient violence to prevent alternative organizations of institutions and assets. The people who govern may or may not constitute sufficient violence to do so. Usually they don’t. In china they do. In russia they do. Because the fear of chaos in those countries is the opposite of the love of opportunity in NE European civilizations. – something the rest of the world cannot comprehend – because they never developed trust or commons … as we did.

  • Disambiguation of Government (Bankruptcy)

    [D]isambiguation:

    1. Military > State > Government > Commons > institutions-organization
    2. Rule of Law > Law > Courts > Contracts > Biz-trade
    3. Strategy+Tradition > Religion+Education+Academy+Media > Families/Consumers > People-consumption

    State (corporation holding assets) 1. Federal State -> Federal Government 2. … Regional State -> Regional Government 3. … … Territorial: County Corporation -> County Government 4. … … Market: Local Corporation -> Local Government If a state declares bankruptcy the creditors get screwed all or partly. The state has demonstrated incompetence in the management of state affairs, and then the creditors will seek higher interest rates in the future, and after a cycle or two governments ‘learn’ partly because they have evidence of the consequences after bankruptcy and no evidence prior to bankruptcy – just as we now have evidence of immigration, diversity, monetary policy, and democracy – evidence of failure seems to be necessary to prevent repetition of human hubris. The state as a monopoly on violence is evidently false because it was a construct of the westphalian peace. At present it’s falsified, just as it was prior to the westphalian peace. In other words it was always false. The state is a corporation. The institutions organize the use of assets. The owners of that corporation consist of a small number of people willing to use sufficient violence to prevent alternative organizations of institutions and assets. The people who govern may or may not constitute sufficient violence to do so. Usually they don’t. In china they do. In russia they do. Because the fear of chaos in those countries is the opposite of the love of opportunity in NE European civilizations. – something the rest of the world cannot comprehend – because they never developed trust or commons … as we did.

  • When you go to law school you do not learn what we teach here: strictly construc

    When you go to law school you do not learn what we teach here: strictly constructed natural law jurisprudence. Most of what you learn is procedure, statute (legislation), and case law (examples). Or “How to work the process”. That’s why P makes sense to you. Because its internally consistent.

    Now, once you learn ENOUGH case law, you realize that the court does a pretty good job most of the time. The problem is the lack of jurisprudence (rules of law) in the constitution, and the ‘legislation’ that violates the natural law on top of it.

    Most of the ‘bad stuff’ is procedural manipulation somewhere between the police, the prosecution, the court staff.

    There are very good lawyers and not so good lawyers. And you can tell when reading the arguments put before the court which one you’re dealing with.

    Mostly there are waaaaaaayyyyy too many lawyers. And that’s why I prefer the british two stage system. So that a lawyer(customer service representative) and a barrister(presents to the court) are separated. This allows you to get customer service from a lawyer, but a barrister may refuse your case. This savse the judge and jury from legal clown world. That’s the ONLY thing I really prefer about the british system other than the wigs. I really like the wigs. šŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 17:40:00 UTC

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: A body of policy changes & law, a project plan, shareholder ag

    RT @ThruTheHayes: A body of policy changes & law, a project plan, shareholder agreements, & a constitution for function; or it’s shit-talk.…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 17:18:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253734990996819969

  • Lesson

    1. Eve’s apple, 2. Pandora’s box, 3. The 19th Amendment.

    Is it the fault of the female, or is it the fault of the male, for not having created laws to equally suppress the female interpersonal and social, superpredator, that they did to suppress the male physical and military, superpredator. One family one vote was a compromise. In the absence of one family one vote we require houses for men and women just as we required house for aristocracy, nobility, industry, and family. The animal just follows its instincts. It is up for those few men of ability to domesticate the animals. And we are always the few.

  • Lesson

    1. Eve’s apple, 2. Pandora’s box, 3. The 19th Amendment.

    Is it the fault of the female, or is it the fault of the male, for not having created laws to equally suppress the female interpersonal and social, superpredator, that they did to suppress the male physical and military, superpredator. One family one vote was a compromise. In the absence of one family one vote we require houses for men and women just as we required house for aristocracy, nobility, industry, and family. The animal just follows its instincts. It is up for those few men of ability to domesticate the animals. And we are always the few.

  • We can thank Rome…

    —“We can thank Rome for bastardizing the teaching of Christ and merging roman law and administration into religious fiction which became legal fiction 😣”— Justin Coone

    In the end, yes, that’s the problem in a nutshell. Tried to make a jewish middle eastern(occult) supernatural(astrological) government for peasants, women, and slaves (equalitarian), over a european rule of law (empirical), magical metallurgicall), and warrior people (hierarchical) – fracturing the society in exchange for obtaining a clerical and priestly class and egyptian levels of religious rule at the cost of making common people into peasants rather than kinfolk. That’s really what’s lost: making kin into peasants.

  • We can thank Rome…

    —“We can thank Rome for bastardizing the teaching of Christ and merging roman law and administration into religious fiction which became legal fiction 😣”— Justin Coone

    In the end, yes, that’s the problem in a nutshell. Tried to make a jewish middle eastern(occult) supernatural(astrological) government for peasants, women, and slaves (equalitarian), over a european rule of law (empirical), magical metallurgicall), and warrior people (hierarchical) – fracturing the society in exchange for obtaining a clerical and priestly class and egyptian levels of religious rule at the cost of making common people into peasants rather than kinfolk. That’s really what’s lost: making kin into peasants.

  • But I’m Not Creating a Popular Political Movement I’m Creating a Revolution and

    But I’m Not Creating a Popular Political Movement I’m Creating a Revolution and A Body of Law https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/23/but-im-not-creating-a-popular-political-movement-im-creating-a-revolution-and-a-body-of-law/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-23 20:06:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253415062234034177