Theme: Constitutional Order

  • Our Need: Reducing the Canon of The West to A Bible: The Law Beyond Which None M

    Our Need: Reducing the Canon of The West to A Bible: The Law Beyond Which None May Tread https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/09/our-need-reducing-the-canon-of-the-west-to-a-bible-the-law-beyond-which-none-may-tread/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 15:12:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259139198407278592

  • Our Need: Reducing the Canon of The West to A Bible: The Law Beyond Which None May Tread

    May 3, 2020, 3:20 PM (From OCT 2019) (updated) The west never had a single bible, but a canon, and that canon was written in multiple frames although the spectrum of scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological. Philosophy, theology, tradition, are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes. Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for. While we traditionally had rule of law beyond which no leader may tread, we allowed liberalism (even classical liberalism) to violate that traditional law under the presumption that while the monarchy needed be constrained by law, we the people were somehow so special and virtuous we need not be. Our British Ancestors, Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the English civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution. But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because under programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program (yes). They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church. The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, by taking advantage of our our christian virtue, our market tolerance, our false claim that man was oppressed rather than domesticated by the aristocracy and markets, and our false presumption that we could create an aristocracy of everyone if they were but given the chance. We dragged them out of their failed cultures, failed religions, failed institutions, failed governments, and failed civilizations. We dragged them kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of a hostile nature. And They hate us for it. They work daily to destroy us. They seek to bring their failures to us, not our successes to them. We gave them that chance. And they failed. They failed because are unfit, unwilling, or unable, and undeserving. And they are destroying the monument to mankind that we have made. So we must complete the Greco-roman-germanic-anglo-American research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation. We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to Jewish law and Muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the social political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation. We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread. And we need to enforce it intolerantly, unforgivingly, and mercilessly, as our ancestors defended themselves by the same means. Heroism and excellence, The universal militia, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war. That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty. And it is our law beyond which none may tread.

  • Our Need: Reducing the Canon of The West to A Bible: The Law Beyond Which None May Tread

    May 3, 2020, 3:20 PM (From OCT 2019) (updated) The west never had a single bible, but a canon, and that canon was written in multiple frames although the spectrum of scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological. Philosophy, theology, tradition, are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes. Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for. While we traditionally had rule of law beyond which no leader may tread, we allowed liberalism (even classical liberalism) to violate that traditional law under the presumption that while the monarchy needed be constrained by law, we the people were somehow so special and virtuous we need not be. Our British Ancestors, Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the English civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution. But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because under programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program (yes). They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church. The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, by taking advantage of our our christian virtue, our market tolerance, our false claim that man was oppressed rather than domesticated by the aristocracy and markets, and our false presumption that we could create an aristocracy of everyone if they were but given the chance. We dragged them out of their failed cultures, failed religions, failed institutions, failed governments, and failed civilizations. We dragged them kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of a hostile nature. And They hate us for it. They work daily to destroy us. They seek to bring their failures to us, not our successes to them. We gave them that chance. And they failed. They failed because are unfit, unwilling, or unable, and undeserving. And they are destroying the monument to mankind that we have made. So we must complete the Greco-roman-germanic-anglo-American research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation. We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to Jewish law and Muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the social political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation. We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread. And we need to enforce it intolerantly, unforgivingly, and mercilessly, as our ancestors defended themselves by the same means. Heroism and excellence, The universal militia, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war. That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty. And it is our law beyond which none may tread.

  • I never make errors. It is my job. Only europeans have rule of law. Rule of Law

    I never make errors. It is my job. Only europeans have rule of law. Rule of Law limits Rulers. Chinese never developed rule of law. Just rule by command. CCP still uses rule by command. It is efficient. it is corrupt. but it is ok for china.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 15:08:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259138273076817920

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259111400841940992

  • China does not have rule of law and never did. chinese people don’t have rights.

    China does not have rule of law and never did. chinese people don’t have rights. Chinese government can issue any command it wants. This is common knowledge in international legal studies. The question is why don’t you know this? Like many things chinese are very ignorant people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:23:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259111721274421248

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259111400841940992

  • No the world is united by commerce and law and self interest. If you cannot use

    No the world is united by commerce and law and self interest. If you cannot use law (china doesn’t have law, and never did, it has command), You are too primitive a people to understand. This is why you failed. Confucius failed to solve the problem of politics. You failed.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:20:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259110983370444801

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259108340652630016

  • So this is why you have your history:Monopoly bureaucracy and hierarchy, and why

    So this is why you have your history:Monopoly bureaucracy and hierarchy, and why we have our history: Markets in everything including government, mediated by our law. This is why we have HIGH TRUST and truth before face, and you have low trust, corruption and face before truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:30:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259098345131380737

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259097737225809920


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HaiTaoYang9 You fear decentralization because of your past conflicts – but your past conflict was failure to develop the science of law and politics. You chose bureaucracy instead. We pay the price of conflict to develop law and politics and this is why we adapt and invent faster: tolerance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1259097737225809920

  • Again, Han culture not genetics. My comment above is correct. Europeans maintain

    Again, Han culture not genetics. My comment above is correct. Europeans maintained local political authority but cultural homogeneity (christianity and law). So we had weak federal government (church) you have strong. But this is why china stagnated and europe advanced rapidly.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:24:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259096802319613953

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259095825629581314

  • Sorry but it was. You are a chipmunk. And you don’t know who you’re talking to.

    Sorry but it was.
    You are a chipmunk.
    And you don’t know who you’re talking to.
    If you did you wouldn’t have said something that stupid.
    We know the time and place rule of law was invented.
    China never invented it. Nor islam. India and russia still can’t manage it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 01:59:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258939675995181056

    Reply addressees: @niceprinter12 @healingbyhenry @sunkiisss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258939088008359938

  • P increases the scope of the law to cover both false promise, and baiting into h

    P increases the scope of the law to cover both false promise, and baiting into hazard, at contractual ( private contracts ) and political ( contracts of the commons ) scales. This is the weakness in the current law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-07 12:12:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258369025073127425

    Reply addressees: @YvesBurri @EricLiford @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258365508732289027


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @YvesBurri @EricLiford @Nationalist7346 That’s patently false. The foundation of contract law is reciprocity, and irreciprocal contracts will not be enforced by the court. The problem is the court’s definition of irreciprocity favors personal choice and consequence rather than legal defense from baiting into hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1258365508732289027