Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • In a Perfect World….

    Jan 29, 2020, 11:28 AM   We want a monarchy with veto power if we can eventually get one. We need a cabinet (a management team) We need a prime minister that is not a senator We need a senate (market for commons) This senate can only produce contracts between the states in matters of revenue, infrastructure, trade. The house is eliminated. The state is a corporation run by the management team, The divisions include the judiciary, the military-state-intel, the treasury, the insurer. The fed reserve is gone and pulled into the treasury. Each state shall have a governor, cabinet, senate(territory), upper house(business), and lower house(families) Each governor appoints two senators. The blue cities are forcibly converted to Free Cities(if we fight) or States(if we agree). All state lines are fungible on the neighborhood level. Any new state can be formed anew.

  • In a Perfect World….

    Jan 29, 2020, 11:28 AM   We want a monarchy with veto power if we can eventually get one. We need a cabinet (a management team) We need a prime minister that is not a senator We need a senate (market for commons) This senate can only produce contracts between the states in matters of revenue, infrastructure, trade. The house is eliminated. The state is a corporation run by the management team, The divisions include the judiciary, the military-state-intel, the treasury, the insurer. The fed reserve is gone and pulled into the treasury. Each state shall have a governor, cabinet, senate(territory), upper house(business), and lower house(families) Each governor appoints two senators. The blue cities are forcibly converted to Free Cities(if we fight) or States(if we agree). All state lines are fungible on the neighborhood level. Any new state can be formed anew.

  • What Does “Go” Mean (revolution, civil war)

    Jan 29, 2020, 6:50 PM

    1. A moral license – it has to be explained (the declaration)
    2. A set of demands – they have to be published and made. (a constitution)
    3. A plan of transition – ( what it sounds like)
    4. A means of altering the status quo (incremental pressure to drive the parties to the table)

    I have a clear understanding of the means of political acceleration. I have a very clear understanding of the boogaloo strategy and have for years. The point is to make it so vividly certain it isn’t necessary – but you can’t fake it. The threat has to be a promise for it to work. If I have to, I”ll work at sounding very scary when the time comes. “And that is why you will agree to these terms in our mutual interest. Otherwise if we must fight to win, we will win, and our terms of settlement will worsen everyday”. And if we must, then we must, and if men are not willing to do what they must – they are not men worth having.

  • What Does “Go” Mean (revolution, civil war)

    Jan 29, 2020, 6:50 PM

    1. A moral license – it has to be explained (the declaration)
    2. A set of demands – they have to be published and made. (a constitution)
    3. A plan of transition – ( what it sounds like)
    4. A means of altering the status quo (incremental pressure to drive the parties to the table)

    I have a clear understanding of the means of political acceleration. I have a very clear understanding of the boogaloo strategy and have for years. The point is to make it so vividly certain it isn’t necessary – but you can’t fake it. The threat has to be a promise for it to work. If I have to, I”ll work at sounding very scary when the time comes. “And that is why you will agree to these terms in our mutual interest. Otherwise if we must fight to win, we will win, and our terms of settlement will worsen everyday”. And if we must, then we must, and if men are not willing to do what they must – they are not men worth having.

  • How Immigrant Cities Seceded by Violating the Law

    Jan 30, 2020, 6:04 PM by Jerry Odom How It’s Done (flawless) I’ll just drop this here, see your influence To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world: a) They establishments of sanctuary cities to harbor known illegal alien in direct violation of federal law us code 8 1324. b) The issuing of driver’s license and state documents to illegal aliens also in violation of federal law. (code 8 1324) c) Allowing illegal aliens to vote in federal elections is also a direct violation of federal law. d) Violation of Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 e) Violation of the 14th amendment and birthright citizenship f) Violation of oath of office 5 U.S. Code § 3331.Oath of office and Article 6 a. “that I will support and defend the Constitution” g) Violation of Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 h) Violation of article 4 section 4 i) Advocating for the overthrow of the US government via policy j) Violation of Clause 2 of Article 6: the Supremacy Clause k) countless violation of the Second Amendment l) the suppression of our religion, it’s replacement by adoption and expansion of an Alien and deceitful pseudoscientific cult via artful accounting, cherry-picking of measures, and willful ignorance of the changes in the capital of kin, culture, norm, tradition, and civilization; m) the forcible monopolization of our education, its use for indoctrination against our religion, and for the cult of the state; This is a shortlist of atrocities committed,

  • How Immigrant Cities Seceded by Violating the Law

    Jan 30, 2020, 6:04 PM by Jerry Odom How It’s Done (flawless) I’ll just drop this here, see your influence To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world: a) They establishments of sanctuary cities to harbor known illegal alien in direct violation of federal law us code 8 1324. b) The issuing of driver’s license and state documents to illegal aliens also in violation of federal law. (code 8 1324) c) Allowing illegal aliens to vote in federal elections is also a direct violation of federal law. d) Violation of Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 e) Violation of the 14th amendment and birthright citizenship f) Violation of oath of office 5 U.S. Code § 3331.Oath of office and Article 6 a. “that I will support and defend the Constitution” g) Violation of Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 h) Violation of article 4 section 4 i) Advocating for the overthrow of the US government via policy j) Violation of Clause 2 of Article 6: the Supremacy Clause k) countless violation of the Second Amendment l) the suppression of our religion, it’s replacement by adoption and expansion of an Alien and deceitful pseudoscientific cult via artful accounting, cherry-picking of measures, and willful ignorance of the changes in the capital of kin, culture, norm, tradition, and civilization; m) the forcible monopolization of our education, its use for indoctrination against our religion, and for the cult of the state; This is a shortlist of atrocities committed,

  • Curt Can You Explain… (Legal Reform)

    Jan 30, 2020, 6:41 PM

    —“I just read your “Civilizational Differences in Strategy and Conflict”. Excellent work! … I have a question. Toward the end of the post, you write “punish it in a via-negativa market for the continuous suppression of profit by plausible deniability of accountability”. Can you give an example of such a market, or an example of the effect of of such a market? Do you mean punishment for an observed negative consequence to a demonstrated interest (reciprocity)?”—

    “profit from plausible deniability to bait into hazard” Selling goods or services without warranty Selling drugs, encouraging prostitution, or pornography. Selling gambling, selling alcohol on credit, selling credit. Selling improbabilities, advertising, religion Selling marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism… One is not accountable for the consequences, because there is no warranty stated, and no warranty enforced. This is how abrahamic method of deceit was spread: western sovereignty is vulnerable to undermining because sovereigns are not prohibited from making bad choices, and we have forbidden retaliation and restitution for consequences of volition – even voluntary choice to be baited into hazard. In other words, the current emphasis on criminal reform is to add requirement for intent to stop police from criminalizing accidental violations. So our requirement for means, motive, opportunity, would be increased to include ‘intent’ also. Likewise, my emphasis on libility reform would be to force involuntary warranty on any baiting into hazard – which would effectively outlaw baiting into hazard, as violating sovereignty in the same way deceit violates sovereignty – and literally gut the advertising, media, entertainment, gambling, academic, credit card, consumer-financial, debt collection, and political sectors, and even the contracts for things like cell and cable bills. this effectively converts buyer beware (despite his or her ignorance) to lender beware (because of their asymmetric knowledge of risks). Instead all of this lending would go through the treasury and all CONSUMER interest be captured for the commons. If we combine liquidity distribution (managing the money supply) with direct distribution of cash to citizens on debit cards, we will invert the economy to be in the service of consumers. I hope this explains enough. Just like falsificationism and testimonialism and grammars convert justification to falsification – inverting our understanding of truth, this conversion of the law will restore sovereignty to the citizens and end the parasitism upon them that has destroyed the working middle managerial and small business classes. This is the greatest most revolutionary reform since the roman redistribution of land, and second only to the restructuring of continental power in the 19th century. And yet it is the very OPPOSITE of marxism.

  • Curt Can You Explain… (Legal Reform)

    Jan 30, 2020, 6:41 PM

    —“I just read your “Civilizational Differences in Strategy and Conflict”. Excellent work! … I have a question. Toward the end of the post, you write “punish it in a via-negativa market for the continuous suppression of profit by plausible deniability of accountability”. Can you give an example of such a market, or an example of the effect of of such a market? Do you mean punishment for an observed negative consequence to a demonstrated interest (reciprocity)?”—

    “profit from plausible deniability to bait into hazard” Selling goods or services without warranty Selling drugs, encouraging prostitution, or pornography. Selling gambling, selling alcohol on credit, selling credit. Selling improbabilities, advertising, religion Selling marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism… One is not accountable for the consequences, because there is no warranty stated, and no warranty enforced. This is how abrahamic method of deceit was spread: western sovereignty is vulnerable to undermining because sovereigns are not prohibited from making bad choices, and we have forbidden retaliation and restitution for consequences of volition – even voluntary choice to be baited into hazard. In other words, the current emphasis on criminal reform is to add requirement for intent to stop police from criminalizing accidental violations. So our requirement for means, motive, opportunity, would be increased to include ‘intent’ also. Likewise, my emphasis on libility reform would be to force involuntary warranty on any baiting into hazard – which would effectively outlaw baiting into hazard, as violating sovereignty in the same way deceit violates sovereignty – and literally gut the advertising, media, entertainment, gambling, academic, credit card, consumer-financial, debt collection, and political sectors, and even the contracts for things like cell and cable bills. this effectively converts buyer beware (despite his or her ignorance) to lender beware (because of their asymmetric knowledge of risks). Instead all of this lending would go through the treasury and all CONSUMER interest be captured for the commons. If we combine liquidity distribution (managing the money supply) with direct distribution of cash to citizens on debit cards, we will invert the economy to be in the service of consumers. I hope this explains enough. Just like falsificationism and testimonialism and grammars convert justification to falsification – inverting our understanding of truth, this conversion of the law will restore sovereignty to the citizens and end the parasitism upon them that has destroyed the working middle managerial and small business classes. This is the greatest most revolutionary reform since the roman redistribution of land, and second only to the restructuring of continental power in the 19th century. And yet it is the very OPPOSITE of marxism.

  • A Simple Prescription for A Political Solution

    Jan 31, 2020, 11:37 AM Whether libertarian, conservative, right, or hard right you should follow me even if you don’t always get what I’m on about. Traditionalists and Christians too – just grit your teeth when I go all ‘Yes, Christianity but no to Abrahamic Theology’. ‘Cause together we will win. 😉 The American Revolution for Independence from the crown had less support than the conservatives currently do – even those conservatives that are willing to fight. The only thing preventing conservatives from acting is a prescription for a solution that is possible to implement. So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states. The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and re-associate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders. This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire; a weak federal government as was the church. This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics; reduces power distance in producing those commons; allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference. The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes. This rough solution solves the problem of preserving the value of scale of both traditional european weak federal unity providing monetary, economic, and military security while allowing the separation of traditional peoples from immigrant and urban peoples. I have not addressed the most important reformation of the Monetary, Treasury, banking, financial, consumer credit, and debt sectors which will be the greatest reallocation of economic advantage in centuries – and the opposite of marxist folly. That’s for elsewhere. -cheers

  • A Simple Prescription for A Political Solution

    Jan 31, 2020, 11:37 AM Whether libertarian, conservative, right, or hard right you should follow me even if you don’t always get what I’m on about. Traditionalists and Christians too – just grit your teeth when I go all ‘Yes, Christianity but no to Abrahamic Theology’. ‘Cause together we will win. 😉 The American Revolution for Independence from the crown had less support than the conservatives currently do – even those conservatives that are willing to fight. The only thing preventing conservatives from acting is a prescription for a solution that is possible to implement. So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states. The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and re-associate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders. This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire; a weak federal government as was the church. This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics; reduces power distance in producing those commons; allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference. The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes. This rough solution solves the problem of preserving the value of scale of both traditional european weak federal unity providing monetary, economic, and military security while allowing the separation of traditional peoples from immigrant and urban peoples. I have not addressed the most important reformation of the Monetary, Treasury, banking, financial, consumer credit, and debt sectors which will be the greatest reallocation of economic advantage in centuries – and the opposite of marxist folly. That’s for elsewhere. -cheers