Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • “A republic will always end up run by an aristocracy or an oligarchy. In the cas

    —“A republic will always end up run by an aristocracy or an oligarchy. In the case of the (originally) aristocratic republic of the US, incremental democratization (esp. after 1828), mass lower class immigration and democratic control of the popular media (industrialization of propaganda)was the means by which a largely foreign oligarchy was able to supplant the formerly ruling WASP aristocracy in the 20th c. to the detriment of us all.”—Scott De Warren

  • The Case for Fascism 😉

    Nov 5, 2019, 9:10 AM

    —“Do NOT let fear of communism drive you into fascism.”—Stefan Molyneux

    If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T. One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage. This “Fascism” prevents consumption of accumulated genetic, personal, shareheld, common, social, portable, fixed, territorial, and institutional capital advocated by immoral libertarians under free trade, open borders, and the sophism of non aggression w/o including ALL capital. So if “Fascism” means intolerance that means Rule of Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, for individual, family, clan, tribe, and nation including familial, social, normative, traditional, institutional, genetic capital the aggressive, zero-tolerance, prosecution = Optimum Life. So yes, I want, all moral men want, “Fascism” if “Fascism” is Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Markets in Everything, intolerance for Monopoly of Abrahamic undermining by parasitisms of universalism, judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and lying. And that includes prosecution of those who would cast that Fascism (Intolerance) as Immoral, Unethical, Undesirable, who by doing so conspires with our ancient enemies to Underming (Again) our great civilization, by granting license for fomentation of crimes against our people. So “I pray thee take heed” that you do not conspire, even in ignorance, regardless of your intentions, with ancient enemies, whose strategy is to incite monopoly, tyranny, irreciprocity, parasitism, ignorance, sophism, superstition, pseudoscience, and denial to destroy us AGAIN. Because THE LAW does not forgive ignorance of The Law, and when prosecution, restitution, punishment, and prevention are soon restored, those who conspire, in ignorance or not, intent or not, willingly or not, shall be punished – all the same. And what restitution for genocide? So you are either a Fascist for the Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity or you are the enemy of mankind, and you have confessed your guilt, and those of us who can, shall have no mercy in restitution, punishment, and prevention of imitators by making an example of you.

  • The Case for Fascism 😉

    Nov 5, 2019, 9:10 AM

    —“Do NOT let fear of communism drive you into fascism.”—Stefan Molyneux

    If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T. One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage. This “Fascism” prevents consumption of accumulated genetic, personal, shareheld, common, social, portable, fixed, territorial, and institutional capital advocated by immoral libertarians under free trade, open borders, and the sophism of non aggression w/o including ALL capital. So if “Fascism” means intolerance that means Rule of Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, for individual, family, clan, tribe, and nation including familial, social, normative, traditional, institutional, genetic capital the aggressive, zero-tolerance, prosecution = Optimum Life. So yes, I want, all moral men want, “Fascism” if “Fascism” is Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Markets in Everything, intolerance for Monopoly of Abrahamic undermining by parasitisms of universalism, judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and lying. And that includes prosecution of those who would cast that Fascism (Intolerance) as Immoral, Unethical, Undesirable, who by doing so conspires with our ancient enemies to Underming (Again) our great civilization, by granting license for fomentation of crimes against our people. So “I pray thee take heed” that you do not conspire, even in ignorance, regardless of your intentions, with ancient enemies, whose strategy is to incite monopoly, tyranny, irreciprocity, parasitism, ignorance, sophism, superstition, pseudoscience, and denial to destroy us AGAIN. Because THE LAW does not forgive ignorance of The Law, and when prosecution, restitution, punishment, and prevention are soon restored, those who conspire, in ignorance or not, intent or not, willingly or not, shall be punished – all the same. And what restitution for genocide? So you are either a Fascist for the Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity or you are the enemy of mankind, and you have confessed your guilt, and those of us who can, shall have no mercy in restitution, punishment, and prevention of imitators by making an example of you.

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless

    Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. https://t.co/xjWDd7U0Ay

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless

    Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/any-of-the-ists-are-meaningless/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 21:34:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267207814683987968

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless.

    Nov 5, 2019, 6:33 PM Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineers order and suppresses demand for authority, then you’re hand waving another NAP-lie. So say Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Property-in-Toto, and then Commune, Oligarchy, Monarchy, or Despot, and then the means of revenue generation to pay for defense of territory externally, and defense of property internally with sheriff, and court , both of which are sufficient to deny competitors conquest. And then what comons will you produce and how will you pay for them, in order to attract trade, people, and opportunity, sufficient that neighboring ‘states’ do not conquer you as a parasite upon their economy.

  • Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless.

    Nov 5, 2019, 6:33 PM Any of the ‘-ists are meaningless. Unless you write a constitution that engineers order and suppresses demand for authority, then you’re hand waving another NAP-lie. So say Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Property-in-Toto, and then Commune, Oligarchy, Monarchy, or Despot, and then the means of revenue generation to pay for defense of territory externally, and defense of property internally with sheriff, and court , both of which are sufficient to deny competitors conquest. And then what comons will you produce and how will you pay for them, in order to attract trade, people, and opportunity, sufficient that neighboring ‘states’ do not conquer you as a parasite upon their economy.

  • Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature

    Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature https://t.co/QeaoVfjYM1

  • Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature

    Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/thingthang-ding-jury-assembly-senate-legislature/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 21:00:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267199216125988866

  • Thing(Thang, Ding): Jury > Assembly > Senate > Legislature

    Nov 6, 2019, 6:57 AM Thing (assembly) – Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

    THING(THANG,DING): JURY > ASSEMBLY > SENATE > LEGISLATURE

    A thing was a governing assembly in early Germanic society, made up of the free people of the community presided over by law-speakers. The word appears in Old Norse, Old English, and modern Icelandic as þing, in Middle English (as in modern English), Old Saxon, Old Dutch, and Old Frisian as thing, in German as Ding, and in modern Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Faroese, Gutnish, and Norn as ting, all from a reconstructed Proto-Germanic neuter *þingą; the word is the same as the more common English word thing, both having at their heart the basic meaning of “an assemblage, a coming together of parts”—in the one case, an “assembly” or “meeting”, in the other, an “entity”, “object”, or “thing”. The meeting-place of a thing was called a “thingstead” (Old English þingstede) or “thingstow” (Old English þingstōw). The Anglo-Saxon folkmoot (Old English folcgemōt, “folk meeting”; Middle English folkesmōt; modern Norwegian folkemøte) was analogous, the forerunner to the witenagemōt and a precursor of the modern Parliament of the United Kingdom. Today the term lives on in the English term hustings, in the official names of national legislatures and political and judicial institutions of Nordic countries and, in the Manx form tyn, as a term for the three legislative bodies on the Isle of Man.