What separates classical liberalism (anglo libertarianism), from the P-Constitution’s reformation: 1) a greater emphasis on the law limiting behavior; 2) less on the government as legislator; 3) more on the treasury as a sovereign investor,4) ending the false promise of equality.
Theme: Constitutional Order
-
Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity in Demonstrated Int
Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity in Demonstrated Interests.
Common law, constitution, enumerated rights, in strictly constructed (un-interpretable) form.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 12:09:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272501541228994560
Reply addressees: @mutazsoliman @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272495925651537920
-
Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity in Demonstrated Int
Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity in Demonstrated Interests.
Common law, constitution, enumerated rights, in strictly constructed (un-interpretable) form.
Reply addressees: @mutazsoliman @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays -
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under P-law. And we create a market for their suppression in defense of the informational commons. And if we purge vehemently enough we will make their attempts untenable for a thousand years.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 11:26:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272490716426616832
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272489771294695424
-
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under
(It’s very, very, hard to get around the law in P-law, and the amendments under P-law. And we create a market for their suppression in defense of the informational commons. And if we purge vehemently enough we will make their attempts untenable for a thousand years.)
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @NoahRevoy @JulieBorowski @JohnMarkSays -
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you se
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you seek the benefits of the group you gain the liabilities of the group.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 11:19:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272489004668239872
Reply addressees: @SirJohn981 @Freesoilyeah
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272488520255447040
-
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you se
Correct. Our constitutional amendments restore collective punishment. “If you seek the benefits of the group you gain the liabilities of the group.”
Reply addressees: @SirJohn981 @Freesoilyeah -
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/104097906_306376510760509_5973982085
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/104097906_306376510760509_5973982085551804489_o_306376507427176.jpg CLOSING ARGUMENT IN BLOCK VS DOOLITTLECLOSING ARGUMENT IN BLOCK VS DOOLITTLE
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 08:38:00 UTC
-
If you have rule of law you will have moral markets. If you have (((free markets
If you have rule of law you will have moral markets. If you have (((free markets))) you do not have rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 07:53:00 UTC
-
There is only one remaining libertarianism, and that is Propertarianism: rule of
There is only one remaining libertarianism, and that is Propertarianism: rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity in display word and deed, defended by a universal militia of equally sovereign men.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-15 02:45:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272359476377661440