DURANT’S REASONS WHY ARISTOCRACY BEATS DEMOCRACY
(Though understand, we are still talking about western, natural, rule of law, with a professional cabinet and a the necessity of parliamentary approval of requests for funds from the population.)
In my work I emphasize aristocracy,… https://twitter.com/oldbooksguy/status/1782070256149905448
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 20:23:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782143167367729259
CURT: WHY, DESPITE PROTESTANTISM IN BOTH ENGLAND AND GERMANY DID ENGLAND DEVELOP THE MODERN RULE OF LAW STATE AND GERMANY DIDN’T?
It can be attributed to several causes:
Centralization of Power: England maintained a highly centralized monarchy, simplifying the establishment and enforcement of a uniform rule of law across the nation. In contrast, Germany was fragmented into numerous states and principalities, complicating any uniform application of law.
Common Law Tradition: England’s historical common law system, which prioritized precedents, individual rights, and judicial interpretations, was further reinforced by Protestantism’s emphasis on individual conscience and rule of law. This tradition laid a strong foundation for legal system continuity and development.
Parliamentary System: England’s Parliament was crucial in developing the rule of law, acting as a balance to monarchic power and reinforcing the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. This provided a structured system of checks and balances essential for the rule of law.
Religious Unity: The establishment of the Church of England as the national church post-Reformation unified the nation under a single religious and legal framework, facilitating the streamlined enforcement of the rule of law.
Economic Development: Early industrialization in England bolstered a middle class that demanded and supported a stable legal system, reinforcing the development of the rule of law to protect emerging economic interests.
In Germany, the political fragmentation and influence of Roman law, which emphasized state power over individual rights, delayed similar developments. The religious division among Lutherans, Calvinists, and Catholics further fragmented any sense of national unity, complicating the establishment of a unified legal system.
Germany’s development was delayed by it’s divisions.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-19 21:30:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781435348632940544
RT @TabbyTeamster: @willobri @EireAcc @EmmaBWaldron @18for0 @davidmcw @finn_mcredmond Will, if é is going to adopt a new republic it needs…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-19 13:13:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781310072431218708
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but there is zero chance of collapse of the dollar as long as every alternative has no rule of law and the USA has more of it than anyone else – at least regarding capital.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-16 00:35:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780032287351939110
Reply addressees: @CanadianUltras
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780018878791536787
This section:
https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/part-xx-reforms-constitution/part-seven-the-reforms/article-ii-the-laws-of-man/constitution-the-natural-law/#the-natural-law-as-the-group-strategy-of-the-european-people
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 22:32:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780001346504073237
Reply addressees: @RunicSigil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779982427206946941
DESANTIS AGAIN RESTORING RULE OF LAW IN FLORIDA
https://x.com/i/trending/1777712864440275113
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-09 15:23:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777718873824854457
(Worth Repeating)
The End of Democracy, The Republic, The rule of Law? Or a Second Dark Age Of Ignorance and Dysgenia? https://t.co/PgAWAfTKhb
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-07 03:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776809457181216784
(Worth Repeating)
The End of Democracy, The Republic, The rule of Law? Or a Second Dark Age Of Ignorance and Dysgenia?
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-07 03:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776809457109934081
MISCEGENATION AND ANTI-MISCEGENATION LAWS IN THE USA
—“Anti-miscegenation laws are laws that enforce racial segregation at the level of marriage and intimate relationships by criminalizing interracial marriage and sometimes, they also criminalize sex between members of different races.
In the United States, various state laws prohibited marriages between whites and blacks, and in many states, they also prohibited marriages between whites and Native Americans as well as marriages between whites and Asians. In the U.S., such laws were known as anti-miscegenation laws. From 1913 until 1948, 30 out of the then 48 states enforced such laws
Miscegenation (/mɪˌsɛdʒəˈneɪʃən/ mih-SEJ-ə-NAY-shən) is marriage or admixture between people who are considered to be members of different races. The word, now usually considered pejorative, is derived from a combination of the Latin terms miscere (‘to mix’) and genus (‘race’ or ‘kind’).
The word was coined in an anonymous propaganda pamphlet published in New York City in December 1863, during the American Civil War. The pamphlet was entitled Miscegenation: The Theory of the Blending of the Races, Applied to the American White Man and Negro.
Before the publication of Miscegenation, the words racial intermixing and amalgamation were used as general terms for ethnic and racial genetic mixing.
The pamphlet was a hoax, concocted by Democrats to discredit the Republicans by imputing to them what were then radical views that would offend the vast majority of whites, even those who opposed slavery.
In the United States, interracial marriage, cohabitation and sex have been termed “miscegenation” since the term was coined in 1863.
After the Second World War, an increasing number of states repealed their anti-miscegenation laws. In 1967, in the landmark case Loving v. Virginia, the remaining anti-miscegenation laws were ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren”— From multiple Wiki Articles
(FYI: You must share to comment. Self protection of my feed. Thanks.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 21:57:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776368578981220352
Thomas is the most competent judge on the court and was only exceed by Scalia.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-04 12:58:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775870490206158946
Reply addressees: @harryjsisson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775617494167716042