Curt Doolittle

Theme: Constitutional Order

  • WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ‘ENLIGHTENMENT” AND CAN HAVE IT AGAIN. —C

    WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ‘ENLIGHTENMENT” AND CAN HAVE IT AGAIN.

    —Curt: What are your thoughts on the idea that only a strong government is secure enough to be a limited government?”—

    1)The strongest government is a universal militia, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet.

    2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in common before the French ‘enlightenment’ that converted strong adversarial government to weak distributed government.

    The French experiment failed. Strong government with strong juridical defense and democratic veto of policy by those with demonstrated competence (1-service-family, 2-service-biz/industry, service-3-governorship) is optimum government. it cannot be done better by humans, and can only be improved by computational assistance.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 17:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105158916362511273

  • 2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in com

    2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in common before the French ‘enlightenment’ that converted strong government to distributed government. The French experiment failed. Strong govt with strong juridical defense and veto of policy is optimum.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 17:31:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324403858035089408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324403856697102338

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    1)The strongest government is a *universal militia*, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet. https://twitter.com/bearcaught45/status/1324400507235029000

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1324403856697102338

  • 1)The strongest government is a *universal militia*, rule of law of self-determi

    1)The strongest government is a *universal militia*, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet. https://twitter.com/bearcaught45/status/1324400507235029000

  • 1)The strongest government is a *universal militia*, rule of law of self-determi

    1)The strongest government is a *universal militia*, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 17:28:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324403194206838784

    Reply addressees: @bearcaught45

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324400507235029000

  • 2) And I’d beg my fellow traditionalists (constitutionalists), Romans(xians), an

    2) And I’d beg my fellow traditionalists (constitutionalists), Romans(xians), and ‘spartans'(right) to consider we (a) convert the blue cities into ‘free cities’ (look it up), and rule, or separate and re-join the British Empire, in exchange for the reform of the Bank of England.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 17:11:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324399019058204673

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324399018064121857

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    1) I won’t talk about a strategy for civil war because while part of it is obvious, the novel part of it is not. I will talk about the desirable outcome as returning to the original constitution,its imitation of the Holy Roman Empire, as independent states with a weak government.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1324399018064121857

  • 1) I won’t talk about a strategy for civil war because while part of it is obvio

    1) I won’t talk about a strategy for civil war because while part of it is obvious, the novel part of it is not. I will talk about the desirable outcome as returning to the original constitution,its imitation of the Holy Roman Empire, as independent states with a weak government.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 17:11:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1324399018064121857

  • SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES Three Mar

    SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES

    Three Markets: Via negativa market for juridical DEFENSE, via reciproca markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (marriage), production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services (TRADE), and via positiva markets for the production of commons (OFFENSE)

    All People require civil(private) juridical defense. All Residents require institutional (govt) juridical defense. All Citizens who have demonstrated competence and contribution to the commons may have access to political force(participation) by their achievements, creating Houses of the Classes as a market for the production of commons.

    Limiting participation to property-owning males having performed public service in military, emergency, or civilian corps – and extending it to their wives and children; increasing credit capacity and retirement benefits by their number of children produces optimum incentives. Creating a separate house of females as a substitute for the church may or may not constrain women’s natural hostility to capitalization vs hyperconsumption. We don’t yet know.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 16:57:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105158767599348870

  • The USA is not a country but a federation of states (countries) and its central

    The USA is not a country but a federation of states (countries) and its central problem is attempting to pretend its a country in order to maintain its military power as the inheritor of the British empire.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-04 10:47:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323939803877040129

    Reply addressees: @ForeignPolicy @ebjornlund

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323935630821412864

  • Natural Religion: The Price We Must Pay

    P-Law will produce the wants of Reactionaries: “life, family, community, quality”. It will just do it using formal logic, law, and court as market for suppression of violators that is very difficult if not impossible to undermine, instead of mythology, philosophy, or religion.

    Groups must use organizations and generations that require an oppressive authority to indoctrinate values. If you have a ‘book’ that is not scripture but science, not wisdom but law, then religion to indoctrinate people will evolve within it, and that law will be absorbed by it.

    I’m not a storyteller but a formal scientist, and don’t see it as my job to produce mythology, religion, or indoctrination – that’s a creative enterprise, not a scientific one. My job, the P-Judiciary’s job, and P-Law’s job is to DOCUMENT the law of nature and nature’s god.

    So you may not see my work as religious but that’s because a religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule.

    So there need be no difference between truth, science, law, politics, and religion, if there are no human lies therein. And instead, our religion consists of the wonder of each of us cooperating by competing AND insuring one another as we revel in transcendence not resistance.

    There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all Abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults.

  • Natural Religion: The Price We Must Pay

    P-Law will produce the wants of Reactionaries: “life, family, community, quality”. It will just do it using formal logic, law, and court as market for suppression of violators that is very difficult if not impossible to undermine, instead of mythology, philosophy, or religion.

    Groups must use organizations and generations that require an oppressive authority to indoctrinate values. If you have a ‘book’ that is not scripture but science, not wisdom but law, then religion to indoctrinate people will evolve within it, and that law will be absorbed by it.

    I’m not a storyteller but a formal scientist, and don’t see it as my job to produce mythology, religion, or indoctrination – that’s a creative enterprise, not a scientific one. My job, the P-Judiciary’s job, and P-Law’s job is to DOCUMENT the law of nature and nature’s god.

    So you may not see my work as religious but that’s because a religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule.

    So there need be no difference between truth, science, law, politics, and religion, if there are no human lies therein. And instead, our religion consists of the wonder of each of us cooperating by competing AND insuring one another as we revel in transcendence not resistance.

    There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all Abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults.