Theme: Constitutional Order

  • ROLLUP of today’s quick definition of law (and “not law”)

    ROLLUP of today’s quick definition of law (and “not law”)

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/11/23/i-teach-legal-juridical-science-not-sophistry-and-deceit-so-what-is-law-what-is-crime/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 21:16:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330983616000782336

  • I Teach Legal SCIENCE, not Sophistry and Deceit. So… What Is Law? What Is Crime?

    You will have a problem understanding me because I teach formal logic of juridical science. I do not teach contemporary proceduralism, which consists of legal pseudoscience operating under the sophistry of positive law – in violation of 5000 years of european (eugenic) tradition. —What exactly do you think a law is?— It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW. There is only one law possible, that is tort (trespass). All else is either contract under it, agent contract of the commons (legislation) under it, or edict of general case (edict) or edict of a specific case (regulation) outside of it, or a command by a general in time of war. — You don’t know what a crime is either — A crime is a violation of demonstrated interests that is ensured by the state. A tort is a crime of demonstrated interest the resolution of which is insured by the state. The variation between polities is the demarcation between the scope of demonstrated interests insured each way. An administrative crime is a violation by the members of the state of the terms of a contract of the commons. America unfortunately does not separate administrative courts from civil criminal and family courts. The constraint the strictly constructed natural law places on the government no matter its method of organization and decision, is that it must follow the law of reciprocity we call contract, that forces classes to trade, and legislation (contracts of the commons) constructed as trades. Most of the time trading good behavior for redistribution. —(crickets)— When someone other than Scalia (god rest his soul) tries to argue with me about the law. “Is there no one else?!!” Sigh.

  • I Teach Legal SCIENCE, not Sophistry and Deceit. So… What Is Law? What Is Crime?

    You will have a problem understanding me because I teach formal logic of juridical science. I do not teach contemporary proceduralism, which consists of legal pseudoscience operating under the sophistry of positive law – in violation of 5000 years of european (eugenic) tradition. —What exactly do you think a law is?— It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW. There is only one law possible, that is tort (trespass). All else is either contract under it, agent contract of the commons (legislation) under it, or edict of general case (edict) or edict of a specific case (regulation) outside of it, or a command by a general in time of war. — You don’t know what a crime is either — A crime is a violation of demonstrated interests that is ensured by the state. A tort is a crime of demonstrated interest the resolution of which is insured by the state. The variation between polities is the demarcation between the scope of demonstrated interests insured each way. An administrative crime is a violation by the members of the state of the terms of a contract of the commons. America unfortunately does not separate administrative courts from civil criminal and family courts. The constraint the strictly constructed natural law places on the government no matter its method of organization and decision, is that it must follow the law of reciprocity we call contract, that forces classes to trade, and legislation (contracts of the commons) constructed as trades. Most of the time trading good behavior for redistribution. —(crickets)— When someone other than Scalia (god rest his soul) tries to argue with me about the law. “Is there no one else?!!” Sigh.

  • Why Conservatives Failed, and How P-Law Can Make Us Succeed

    You may or may not notice but unlike all other conservative (european) intellectuals I don’t use shallow (pathetic) moralizing. I simply state the economics of any given question, illustrating the theft, fraud, or deceit (CRIME). I don’t play word games. I DO JUDGEMENTS OF LAW. This is why Europeans (Right) failed to resist the Jewish (Left) war on Europeans. Because you practiced Christian Dogma (sophistry), enlightenment ‘philosophy’ (pseudoscience) and shallow sentimental moralizing, rather than prosecution by simple scientific, common law of tort The pseudoscience and sophistry of Gould-Freud-Boas, Marx-Lenin-Trotsky, Adorno-Fromm, Gramsci-Derrida, Friedan-Steinem, Rothbard-Rand, Strauss-Kristol, Krugman-Stiglitz, NYT-Vox-Wapo, Woke-BLM-Antifa, cant be defeated by our eugenic morality they don’t share – theirs is dysgenic. The Jewish Left and their allies, don’t care about Truth, morality, or intellectual consistency. They care about obtaining power for financial, informational, and political extraction from the white laboring, working, and middle classes so that they can destroy european civ. The Left’s technique(Crime) which we call doxing is a violation of our traditional law wherein we are limited to the two markets: the via negativa of the court, or the via positiva of the market – and prohibited from interference in reputation(defamation), business, or marriage. This ancient Law was undermined by the enlightenment dispute over free speech. at some point free speech and tolerance for it, overtook the limiting of free speech to the truthful and political. It spread into business (snake oil) then into politics, and then into public speech. Stop falling for their game. Stop calling them out on intellectual inconsistency and moral equivalency. Use the truth: ‘Liars, frauds, and crooks at war with our civilization, continuing the 2000 yr Jewish-Islamic warfare against truth, reciprocity, merit, eugenics w/ dysgenia.” This pseudoscience and sophistry can’t be argumentatively defeated by moral competition because moral (reproductive, genetic) instincts are opposite of one another. Arguing with the left only empowers them. They can only be defeated by exposure and prosecution for their CRIMES. Individuals, Groups, Tribes, don’t stop committing crimes that they’ve been getting away with for years, decades, centuries or even millennia, especially if criminality is advocated by their religion. They STOP WHEN YOU PROSECUTE AND PUNISH THEM severely enough for long enough that they habituate new means of earning a living -or they leave. P-Law provides the tool for exposition, accusation, prosecution, conviction, judgment, restitution, punishment & prevention of the Left’s CRIMES against Europeans and MANKIND. P-Law is a value-neutral, universally commensurable, universally decidable, formal logic of Law. There is only ONE WEAKNESS in our civilization preventing our use of truth in ending the lies. The west’s success was hyper adaptivity and hyper innovation because of our institution of self-determination at the cost of market eugenics: we continued natural selection. Face that. Overcome the fear of it. Swallow the science. It is what it is. The only problem we face is bearing the cost of truth before face regardless of cost. Conservativism is reciprocity, reciprocity produces markets, markets are eugenic and conservatives the result of eugenics. The West resulted from rapid evolution by natural selection by adversarial competition made necessary by our reciprocal grant of self-determination by sovereignty reciprocity at the cost of truth-before-face and duty to commons(peers) before self, continuously domesticating man. The west resulted from rapid evolution by natural selection by adversarial competition.

  • Why Conservatives Failed, and How P-Law Can Make Us Succeed

    You may or may not notice but unlike all other conservative (european) intellectuals I don’t use shallow (pathetic) moralizing. I simply state the economics of any given question, illustrating the theft, fraud, or deceit (CRIME). I don’t play word games. I DO JUDGEMENTS OF LAW. This is why Europeans (Right) failed to resist the Jewish (Left) war on Europeans. Because you practiced Christian Dogma (sophistry), enlightenment ‘philosophy’ (pseudoscience) and shallow sentimental moralizing, rather than prosecution by simple scientific, common law of tort The pseudoscience and sophistry of Gould-Freud-Boas, Marx-Lenin-Trotsky, Adorno-Fromm, Gramsci-Derrida, Friedan-Steinem, Rothbard-Rand, Strauss-Kristol, Krugman-Stiglitz, NYT-Vox-Wapo, Woke-BLM-Antifa, cant be defeated by our eugenic morality they don’t share – theirs is dysgenic. The Jewish Left and their allies, don’t care about Truth, morality, or intellectual consistency. They care about obtaining power for financial, informational, and political extraction from the white laboring, working, and middle classes so that they can destroy european civ. The Left’s technique(Crime) which we call doxing is a violation of our traditional law wherein we are limited to the two markets: the via negativa of the court, or the via positiva of the market – and prohibited from interference in reputation(defamation), business, or marriage. This ancient Law was undermined by the enlightenment dispute over free speech. at some point free speech and tolerance for it, overtook the limiting of free speech to the truthful and political. It spread into business (snake oil) then into politics, and then into public speech. Stop falling for their game. Stop calling them out on intellectual inconsistency and moral equivalency. Use the truth: ‘Liars, frauds, and crooks at war with our civilization, continuing the 2000 yr Jewish-Islamic warfare against truth, reciprocity, merit, eugenics w/ dysgenia.” This pseudoscience and sophistry can’t be argumentatively defeated by moral competition because moral (reproductive, genetic) instincts are opposite of one another. Arguing with the left only empowers them. They can only be defeated by exposure and prosecution for their CRIMES. Individuals, Groups, Tribes, don’t stop committing crimes that they’ve been getting away with for years, decades, centuries or even millennia, especially if criminality is advocated by their religion. They STOP WHEN YOU PROSECUTE AND PUNISH THEM severely enough for long enough that they habituate new means of earning a living -or they leave. P-Law provides the tool for exposition, accusation, prosecution, conviction, judgment, restitution, punishment & prevention of the Left’s CRIMES against Europeans and MANKIND. P-Law is a value-neutral, universally commensurable, universally decidable, formal logic of Law. There is only ONE WEAKNESS in our civilization preventing our use of truth in ending the lies. The west’s success was hyper adaptivity and hyper innovation because of our institution of self-determination at the cost of market eugenics: we continued natural selection. Face that. Overcome the fear of it. Swallow the science. It is what it is. The only problem we face is bearing the cost of truth before face regardless of cost. Conservativism is reciprocity, reciprocity produces markets, markets are eugenic and conservatives the result of eugenics. The West resulted from rapid evolution by natural selection by adversarial competition made necessary by our reciprocal grant of self-determination by sovereignty reciprocity at the cost of truth-before-face and duty to commons(peers) before self, continuously domesticating man. The west resulted from rapid evolution by natural selection by adversarial competition.

  • It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW. There is only one law pos

    It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW.
    There is only one law possible, that is tort (trespass). All else is either contract under it, agent contract (legislation) under it, or edict of general case (edict) or edict of a specific case (regulation) outside of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 20:26:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330970881011625985

    Reply addressees: @lawconflicts @josephfcox

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330969709651652611

  • This ancient Law was undermined by the enlightenment dispute over free speech. a

    This ancient Law was undermined by the enlightenment dispute over free speech. at some point free speech and tolerance for it, overtook the limiting of free speech to the truthful and political. It spread into business (snake oil) then into politics, and then into public speech. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1330959554897727495

  • The Left’s technique(Crime) which we call doxing is a violation of our tradition

    The Left’s technique(Crime) which we call doxing is a violation of our traditional law wherein we are limited to the two markets: the via negativa of the court, or the via positiva of the market – and prohibited from interference in reputation(defamation), business, or marriage.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 19:41:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330959554897727495

  • Um. You’re the folks burning, looting, destroying education, culture, norms, tra

    Um. You’re the folks burning, looting, destroying education, culture, norms, traditions, the family, rule of law, the very idea of truth.

    He’s just failing to stop you.
    You know what always happens to you?
    It’s happening again.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 18:09:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330936620028207107

    Reply addressees: @SkyeDawn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330767857169391619

  • Historically polities, states, federations, and empires have excluded certain gr

    Historically polities, states, federations, and empires have excluded certain groups from government, from occupations, from property ownership, and even increased taxes on them because of the higher cost of policing them.

    Ex: Imposing ‘silence’ prohibiting their public speech.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 18:07:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330936096553902082