Theme: Constitutional Order

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.

  • The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of tra

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law.

    Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law.

    Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’.

    It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government.

    And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification.

    So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’.

    The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill.

    Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible.

    But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo.

    So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement.

    And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle.

    Revolution Comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-22 14:03:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106624623188931024

  • The Law, defended by a militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, po

    The Law, defended by a militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418207926431404032

  • And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the stat

    And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418206287490387968

  • It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constit

    It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418205895826231297

  • Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articula

    Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418204611949772802

  • The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of tra

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-22 13:41:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1418204611949772802

  • 8. So the pseudoscientists were successful in law as well as the rest of the fie

    8. So the pseudoscientists were successful in law as well as the rest of the fields: Freud, Boaz, Marx, the neo-marxists esp Gramsci, The Frankfurt School in America, the Postmodernists in France: Derrida, Lyotard, Anti-Male Feminists: Steinem, Friedan and many, many, more. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1417564081658204160 https://t.co/XOzcAYx5Sd

  • @sourpatchlyds 5. With the advent of the middle-class seizure of government, we

    @sourpatchlyds
    5. With the advent of the middle-class seizure of government, we replaced the constant diligence against the violation of our law by the ‘divine right of kings’ with the same problem by ‘the legitimacy of democratic government’. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1417562229671616513

  • @sourpatchlyds 3. European civilization always practiced natural law (self-deter

    @sourpatchlyds
    3. European civilization always practiced natural law (self-determination, reciprocity, jury) And this law limited the government (kings).
    4. If there is a difference between science, morality, and legislation, then ‘such legislation is not law, it is a command.’ https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1417561704649707527