Don’t be stupid. This is how we randomize a jury. Its a technique that’s thousands of years old. The size of the jury reflects the scope of influence of the crime. The jurors selected at random and the size of the jury protect against tampering. Democracy originated with it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-17 13:00:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460956047502458886
Reply addressees: @ReportsDaNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460691287863144452
I can condense all of the work into the constitution at this point, but it’s breaking my brain doing it. I still have to get responsibility, first principle, and the enumeration of the methods of lying in there. And I have to remove some duplication. I think I’ve figured out how.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-16 18:10:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460671714665324554
It’s the sum of everything up to the political level. I could add civilizational strategies to it, because State(male, dominant), Law (ascendant male, reciprocal, or neutral), and Religion (female, submissive) are the three anchor institutions upon which subsequent depend.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-16 14:12:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460611711585693699
Reply addressees: @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460607820865236994
WHY WHLL IT WORK?
Because it P-Law a minor tweak to the most successful system of government in human history, and the only one to create a modern state capable of bulding and maintaining itself as a first world power.
There are a set of minor holes in our ‘operating system’ (Constitution, law, tradition, adn religion) through which the enemy can easily march. To the average person this seems unfixable. However it isn’t. The law creates a market for the suppression of criminality. We need only define the crimes in terms that the law can ‘scientifically’ test. And that’s what I’ve done.
Put the infrastructure in place, and the rest will work. Because these ‘ordinary men’ will have the ability to follow their gut instincts: SUPPRESS WHAT IS IRRECIPROCAL, DISGUSTING, AND DISLOYAL.
You see. That is what drives their intuitions. But they have no means of organizing that suppression and no means of disambiguating ithe irreciprocal disgusting and disloyal from that which is just ‘odd’ or inventive.
So the only question is dominate and pay the cost of civilizing the enemy, or separate and let them pay the cost of their failures.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 19:59:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282848725506873
@dleetr WHY WILL IT WORK?
Because it is a minor tweak to the most successful system of government in human history, and the only one to create a modern state capable of bulding and maintaining itself as a first world power.
Put the infrastructure in place, and the rest will work. Because these ‘ordinary men’ will have the ability to follow their gut instincts: SUPPRESS WHAT IS IRRECIPROCAL, DISGUSTING, AND DISLOYAL.
You see. That is what drives their intuitions. But they have no means of organizing that suppression and no means of disambiguating ithe irreciprocal disgusting and disloyal from that which is just ‘odd’ or inventive.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 19:55:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282834826482207
( … more … )
Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence.
Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it.
What do you need to understand? You need to understand that this law is a science and that the judges defend against internal political enemies the way ‘every man a sheriff does against internal physical and social enemies, and as the military defends against external enemies.
To do that you need to understand the paragraph that describes the European group strategy, the law of reciprocity and testimony, the list of demonstrated interests we call capital, the list of crimes that can be committed, and the rights, obligations, and inalienations under the law that demand we suppress those crimes in ourselves and others.
Can you do that? Yes you can. It’s possible to write a set of posters you can stick on your wall. It will largely mirror your moral intuitions., Just like magical thinking, selfishness, lying, cheating, and stealing will largely mirror leftist intuitions.
The problem I have is (a) getting you idiots to pay attention long enough to understand that (b) show up to make it happen (c) stay in the field long enough to bring it into fruition (d) not go all fundamentalist, or nazi and screw it up by making the people more afraid of your having any semblance of influence, than they are of a constitutional reformation.
So I’ve done my job. It took seventy of the greatest men of the enlightenment to do it the last time. I’m stuck here doing it almost alone with a few others helping me. And you clowns are a train wreck of fail.
So grow up, man up, and learn how to win. But don’t chastise me because I can’t make grownup thinking into a chocolate milkshake of sophistry and ideology for nitwits.
Nitwits just need to show up and shut up, and if necessary ‘supply’ yourselves by the traditional method militia armies always do.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:32:23 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282271022124228
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
– “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you never make a point. A guy like you needs to follow a template, like 1. Briefly state conclusion 2. State context/motivation/problem. 3. Reason. 4. Re-state conclusion.” – Yes it is. Every day. That said… I make the point, I make the point over many posts, not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience. There is only one way to save our civilization it’s by showing up in mass. Showing up in mass requires a set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The young men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadership that fragments into personality cults – precisely because you lack the competency to do anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake. As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbskulls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the chances that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those from the future who don’t show and take the risk. I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementable solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for a rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left, center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states. And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution. Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable. The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly its geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self-interest against itself. (…more in comments)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654
@WhitesAdvocate What do you need to understand? You need to understand that this law is a science and that the judges defend against internal political enemies the way ‘every man a sheriff does against internal physical and social enemies, and as the military defends against external enemies.
To do that you need to understand the paragraph that describes the european group strategy, the law of reciprocity and testimony, the list of demonstrated interests we call capital, the list of crimes that can be committed, and the rights, obligations, and inalienations under the law that demand we suppress those crimes in ourselves and others.
Can you do that? Yes you can. It’s possible to write a set of posters you can stick on your wall. It will largely mirror your moral intuitions., Just like magical thinking, selfishness, lying, cheating and stealing will largely mirror leftist intuitions.
The problem I have is (a) getting you idiots to pay attention long enough to understand that (b) show up to make it happen (c) stay in the field long enough to bring it into fruition (d) not go all fundamentalist, or nazi and screw it up by making the people more afraid of your having any semblance of influence, than they are of a constitutional reformation.
So I’ve done my job. It took seventy of the greatest men of the enlightenment to do it the last time. I’m stuck here doing it almost alone with a few others helping me. And you clowns are a train wreck of fail.
So grow up, man up, and learn how to win. But don’t chastize me because I can’t make grownup thinking into a chocolate milkshake of sophistry and ideology for nitwits.
Nitwits just need to show up and shut up, and if necessary ‘supply’ yourselves by the traditional method militia armies always do.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:29:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282259422278268
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282223412964301
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
@WhitesAdvocate I make the point, I make the point over many posts not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience. There is only one way to save our civilizatoin it’s by showing up in mass. Showing up in mass requries set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The youung men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadershp that fragments into personality cults – precisely becuase you lack teh competency tod o anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake. As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbsculls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the cahnces that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those fromthe future who don’t show and take the risk. I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementalbe solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left , center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states. And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution. Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable. The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly it’s geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self interest against it self. Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence. Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it. (more below)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282223412964301
Yes, “Self Determination by Self Determined Means” therefore provides for ethnostates. Largely the federal govt is restored to resolution of disputes between states, and defense of territorial integrity.
http://naturallawinstitute.com/170027-2/
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:46:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460288034654588936
@MarylandTeamWhite Short answer is yes. Long answer is that It creates the possibility for self determination by self determined means, and specifically for ethnostates, which I assume is what would be the driving force for separation and reformation. However, since we must accept the geostrategic necessity of preserving the territorial integrity of north america under a single military and trade system, it allows for the formation of various city states and states with different preferences. In other words, we convert the ‘leftwing’ cities into city states, and isolate them from infecting the rest of the contry.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:35:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282049079767334
THE SCIENCE OF THE LAW IS THE LAW OF THE SCIENCES – UNIVERSAL LAW
“[Blackstone] it was who first gave to the law the air of a science.”
Yep. Of course, it’s not occurred to our ancestors that science is but applied Anglo, Germanic, European, traditional, law.
P-Law produces the formal science of law – and in doing so the Law of Science: All.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-14 17:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107276490296451034