Theme: Constitutional Order

  • The felony conviction will be thrown out as a construction – it should never had

    The felony conviction will be thrown out as a construction – it should never had been treated as having merit. It had no merit. No one has ever been charged more than one hundred dollars for the same paperwork nonsense.
    Likewise the banks knew what they were getting into, every… https://t.co/gBln6E8moD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-06 17:34:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854215809352302598

  • The felony conviction will be thrown out as a construction – it should never had

    The felony conviction will be thrown out as a construction – it should never had been treated as having merit. It had no merit. No one has ever been charged more than one hundred dollars for the same paperwork nonsense.
    Likewise the banks knew what they were getting into, every real estate asset is treated similarly, the loan was willingly given, paid on time or early, and they bank would do the loan or future loans again.
    The documents case was thrown out. There is some stomach to try to pursue it, but it’s a dead end. There has to be some intent. There has to be some harm. There wasn’t any.
    The fact that he banged a porn star is nothing compared to what men with wealth are capable of and practice with regularity. It’s wealth’s equivalent of common folk ‘doing a line’ or ‘ignoring a few grand’ on their tax return, or breaking some other minor law. (I could tell you stories from around the world).
    I’ve put truly bad people away for real fraud, financial crimes, and racketeering. Trump is squeaky clean compared to even average citizens. The fact that they had to abuse the law in each case is evidence of how clean he is. If there was anything meaningful to find they would have found it. But they didn’t. So they made it up.

    Reply addressees: @eyeslasho


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-06 17:22:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854212899419648000

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854174357616025628

  • There is no such criteria in the definition of liberal. It means only that we ar

    There is no such criteria in the definition of liberal. It means only that we are treated equally under the law in matters of the law. Liberalism had no pretense of equality. Only equality under the law. Disrespecting people is necessary for normative formation and preservation of high trust norms. When the Marxist and Feminists prohibited discrimination they opened the door to the suppression of discrimination on behavior. As such by the false promise of ending discrimination by race, they created the opportunity to suppress discrimination by behavior. That’s how the ‘march through the institutions of cultural production’ was used to destroy the high trust society and high trust norms.

    Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-04 19:04:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1853513653682884608

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1853485887838896318

  • RT @uberboyo: There is no such thing as being replaced Its never over The entire

    RT @uberboyo: There is no such thing as being replaced

    Its never over

    The entire political order depends on crippling your imagination -…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-02 21:56:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1852832215073435756

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THOSE AREN’T JUSTICES They don’t produce settlement. They’ve n

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THOSE AREN’T JUSTICES

    They don’t produce settlement. They’ve not the fitness; or the temperament. Frankly, I’d question…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-31 12:43:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1851968174675353920

  • RT @elonmusk: Doesn’t it seem odd that the same people who demanded that everyon

    RT @elonmusk: Doesn’t it seem odd that the same people who demanded that everyone have vaccine ID are now insisting that voter ID should NO…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-27 20:52:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1850641851570897230

  • It is a necessary step of due diligence, before we have the traditional, common

    It is a necessary step of due diligence, before we have the traditional, common law, constitutional, right to organize and compel the state to address our grievances.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-24 03:54:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1849298355412943236

    Reply addressees: @meateater888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1849275037502816582

  • Dear FBI: —“It’s not that we’re hiding anything, it’s that you can’t seem to c

    Dear FBI:
    —“It’s not that we’re hiding anything, it’s that you can’t seem to comprehend what we’re not hiding.”–

    Everything we do is public. Everything we do is constitutionally legal. Everything we do is moral. We’re pretty open with military and law enforcement. We recruit…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-21 22:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1848488234684195273

  • Dear FBI: —“It’s not that we’re hiding anything, it’s that you can’t seem to c

    Dear FBI:
    —“It’s not that we’re hiding anything, it’s that you can’t seem to comprehend what we’re not hiding.”–

    Everything we do is public. Everything we do is constitutionally legal. Everything we do is moral. We’re pretty open with military and law enforcement. We recruit from military and law enforcement. And we never hear from them as other than with positive feedback.

    Though it’s the FBI that gets sent out every time one of us posts something that can be misinterpreted on social media. And it’s a silly conversation every time.

    The problem? LEO seeking to prosecute vs seeking to understand. Today an agent kept calling me evasive for my answers to the question of whether I was OK with violence. Of course, he doesn’t know that I think this is a dumb question coming from law enforcement that uses violence for moral purposes. Violence like energy is a resource – it’s neutral. Its whether that resource is put to good or ill use. And, worse, whether one grasps what is good or ill in the context.

    In the context of reformation, it’s the risk of violence for failure to redress moral grievances that causes governments to reform. The civil rights groups achieved their goals in under six weeks. They were moral goals (for the most part.)

    So it’s not the violence, is the risk of violence that’s necessary to bring a reluctant party to the table. But it’s that possibility of violence that produces the solution to the problems that eliminate the want of violence. In other words, asking me whether I advocated violence was dishonest, entrapment, and an attempt to force me to say something out of a context that as moral, into one that was not. That’s deception.

    So, seriously, when you come to talk to me, or us, bring someone from Justice with a knowledge of constitutional law and history. Otherwise we literally can’t talk to one another cogently. Watching expressionless incomprehension followed by eyes glazing over, followed by questions or accusations that are not only entrapment, but absurd or intellectually insulting isn’t helpful.

    I understand. Y’all approach matters without much depth. Perhaps that’s your job. But we aren’t like that. We follow the strategy of the founders: demand for a redress of grievances by proposal of moral solutions to those grievances, and the confession of guilt and illegitimacy by failure to address them.

    And while it will take time – it will work.

    So in the meantime, please help us respect one another in our job to try to prevent escalation into civil war.

    Because the difference between us is that we can stop a civil war with our tools.

    You can’t but encourage it with yours.

    Affections.
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-21 22:15:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1848488234436767744

  • RT @beinlibertarian: The Department of Education is an unconstitutional failed e

    RT @beinlibertarian: The Department of Education is an unconstitutional failed experiment.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-19 19:14:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847717890608509331