Voting is no longer a viable option – the left won with immigration what they couldn’t with ideas. Now of the four options, we have only the courts, a repeat of the declaration as a common law suit against the state, and a violent revolution remaining. So, next step is The Court.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-11 00:54:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590870482009862144
It works everywhere. I just don’t understand why it’s complicated to continue to evolve the precision of the law prohibiting crime, just as we have evolved the precision of crime. My work emphasizes the crime that emerged as scale emerged, as promissory capital emerged.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-10 07:11:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590602950506057728
Reply addressees: @WAGHgame @SammySc44817825 @politicalmath
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590602255635742720
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@WAGHgame @SammySc44817825 @politicalmath A market for the suppression of crime isn’t a rube goldberg device. It’s the empirical evidence of the result of rule of law, independent judiciary, and a population of men a sufficient number of whom are trained in military discipline of individual responsibiilty for the group.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1590602255635742720
A market for the suppression of crime isn’t a rube goldberg device. It’s the empirical evidence of the result of rule of law, independent judiciary, and a population of men a sufficient number of whom are trained in military discipline of individual responsibiilty for the group.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-10 07:08:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590602255635742720
Reply addressees: @WAGHgame @SammySc44817825 @politicalmath
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590586538223898624
Correct. However, is this ‘corruption’ controllable by law? Of course. So is that a problem of Rule of Law or the incdentives of capital formation, or human nature, or all of the above? Well, it’s a failure to apply the law to the private sector version of corruption. (theft)
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-10 00:43:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590505352927514624
Reply addressees: @WAGHgame @SammySc44817825 @politicalmath
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590462079122956288
RT @LexCon75: It doesn’t matter if Republicans win today. The only thing that can fix America at this point is #PeacefulSecession and agree…
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-09 15:53:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1590371960651124736
The USA is loud and chaotic but we always find a solution. it’s part of our culture. Personally I work to DIVIDE the usa by devolving it back to a federation. But RU is dead becaue there aren’t enough RU people, and the government is causing demographic and economic suicide.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-08 06:16:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589864322020569088
Reply addressees: @d3rigur @LvivTyler
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589861754812895233
Correct. Though, my point being, that this isn’t a matter of socialism vs capitalism, but the conversion from common (empirical) law to positive (political) law forced on us by those same people. Under common law with universal standing in the hierarchy of courts its correctable.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-08 02:07:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589801676231258112
Reply addressees: @dr_duchesne @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589796882808680448
Capitalism-Socialism false dichotomy only exists to obscure rule of law vs rule by man. If rule of law is sufficient in it’s scope (easy) then mixed economies are possible w/o the excesses of either. But without that universal standard of measurement we invite excesses of both.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-08 00:51:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589782533335814145
Reply addressees: @TOOEdit @dr_duchesne
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589709170995257344
Every civilization reacted to the British invention of the modern legal empirical state, by doubling down. And every civilization has had to adapt. It’s taken centuries for this adaptation to cross the planet. Faster than agrarian and bronze revolutions – emergence will happen.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-07 19:22:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589699861741735936
Reply addressees: @Thaeus4 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589697583165108224
No, because law is the means of maintaining a standard of measure within that population, when humans ‘shift’ morality toward cheating as much as possible in every culture. (justificationism)
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-06 17:18:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589306318233702400
Reply addressees: @NorrisRMMorgan @Bradc36130905 @TheRickWilson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589303346976153602