Theme: Class

  • American Conservatism Is Not An Ideology

    The purpose of an ideology is to assist a group or class in obtaining political power. The purpose of American Conservatism is to prevent groups or classes from obtaining political power. It’s that simple.

  • problem of “Beached White Males”. The middle aged unemployed may never be employ

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/07/04/krauthammer_middle-aged_may_never_get_employed_again.html#.ThMr2PaN3sc.facebookThe problem of “Beached White Males”. The middle aged unemployed may never be employed again. If we distort the economy with credit so that people pursue careers that are only possible within credit bubbles, they are no longer retrainable and able to reenter the work force.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-07-05 11:24:00 UTC

  • left’s hollow fantasy in a Center Right Society

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=3119The left’s hollow fantasy in a Center Right Society.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-07-03 09:40:00 UTC

  • only people that think about Marxism any longer are silly people in the liberal

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=3112The only people that think about Marxism any longer are silly people in the liberal arts who are so invested in the Marxian fantasy that they cannot change even if they wanted to, and simply haven’t died off yet. Marxism, like the French Rationalism that Marx took his inspiration from, is anti-empirical: contrary to the evidence. It’s too bad that the French and Marx failed to understand that English Liberalism w


    Source date (UTC): 2011-07-02 12:19:00 UTC

  • and Aristocracy: two different things, that in the US are intertwined

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=3101Conservatism and Aristocracy: two different things, that in the US are intertwined.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-06-29 21:19:00 UTC

  • Conservatism Isn’t Always Aristocratic, And Aristocracy Needn’t Be Conservative

    American conservatives struggle with the fact that their political sensibilities consist of both the sentiments of conservatism and the remnants of aristocratic european philosophy – and that because they neither understand aristocratic philosophy, or understand conservatism, they cannot separate these two bodies of thought into their constituent parts. As constituent parts they can easily be defended against radical progressives who would continue to undermine the system of rule of law, and innovative individualism that we have inherited from our ancestors, and which is the source of our prosperity. Conservatism is a sentiment and a philosophy. Aristocracy is a philosophy and a system of government. Conservatism has a skeptical view of man’s abilities. Aristocracy has an aspirational view of man’s abilities. But both conservatism and Aristocratic philosophy acknowledge the difference in ability between humans and that inequality is persistent, permanent, and obvious. Both support the meritocratic rotation of elites, as long as that rotation is accomplished in the market or in defense of the realm – in the service of others. And both hold disdain for political ambitions that are not accomplished through the market or defense of the realm. There is nothing inherently conservative about Aristocratic philosophy. But there is everything meritocratic about it.

  • “The histories of mankind are histories only of the higher classes.” – Thomas Ma

    “The histories of mankind are histories only of the higher classes.”

    – Thomas Malthus. (Isn’t that because they’re the exceptions? Why spend effort and analysis to catalog and remember the pervasive and innocuous? Humans, like all apes, will forgo food to watch their Alphas. We learn from our Alphas. Our upper classes are our Alphas. There isn’t anything more to it. And we’d go extinct otherwise.)


    Source date (UTC): 2011-06-10 13:35:00 UTC

  • Only wanna-be nouveau’s lease Lamborghini’s. Players pay cash. Besides, car love

    Only wanna-be nouveau’s lease Lamborghini’s. Players pay cash. Besides, car lovers drive Ferraris: better visibility and feel.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 14:48:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70863223984881664

    Reply addressees: @GuyKawasaki

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70843721482117121


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70843721482117121

  • People will be less wiling to give you money. Fashion is a proletariat industry,

    People will be less wiling to give you money. Fashion is a proletariat industry, and symbol. Money encourages conformity.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 14:25:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70857539046215680

    Reply addressees: @eolsencreative

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70853679867117568


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ericolsenCMO

    I’m contemplating dressing weird just to convince people how creative I am.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70853679867117568

  • No Whoopie, It’s Not About Race.

    Over on Real Clear Politics, Whoopie Goldberg says she’s Playing The Race Card. To which I reply: It’s not about race. It’s about the welfare state’s collectivism vs classical liberalism’s individualism. Three Rules of Politics:

    • RULE 1: “People will not tolerate rulership by someone who despises them and their values.”
    • RULE 2:“People will not tolerate taxation when the proceeds are used for purposes with which they disagree.”
    • RULE 3: “Everyone reverts to group persistence under duress. EVERYONE. So people have racial, cultural, class, and genration biases. They are biased for their group under duress, and egalitarian under prosperity. This is basic behavioral economics. There is no data, anywhere, that supports an alternative view.

    If someone despises you, and uses your taxes for purposes that you disagree with, and you’re under economic duress, then that’s all that’s required to understanding their political position. People despised, and continue to despise Jimmy Carter for the same reasons as they do Obama. FACT 1: Whites pay the vast majority of taxes. While the government does everything it can to obscure the fact that taxes are primarily a white burden, the fact remains, that taxes are almost entirely a white burden. This violates Rule 2 above. And under economic duress it invokes Rule 3 above. If anything is racially loaded, it’s that whites are unique in the world, and in world history, in preferring classical liberalism’s individual freedom and responsibility over the alternatives offered by other, less successful cultures. If race is involved, it’s because Obama demonstrably disdains white people. I didn’t use the word ‘hate’. That’s a loaded word for silly people. But, why else would he call a meeting with a board of six like minded economic advisors this spring without a single white person among them? If race was involved why would whites try to draft Colin Powell, and why would whites be such avid supporters of black conservatives? So, it’s not about race. It’s about being anti-American. American being defined as a class of rights that white, anglo-germanic people invented, and codified in a constitution, and who have consistently extended those rights to other peoples. And have fought wars to extend to other peoples. And born sacrifices to carry to other peoples. So if you want to make it about race, and we actually get the data out during the election cycle, it will have quite the opposite effect that advocates of ‘playing the race card’ will intend. That’s because white people are beginning to act like the minority that they are becoming. And in that process, they have, and will continue to cease feeling guilt over slavery, or their dominance over the expansion of the institutions of prosperity that we call capitalism, and will increasingly act as does the Jewish lobby: in self interest. And for African Americans, if whites lose their guilt and become a minority, and act as diasporic capitalists like the Jews, how is the rest of the world going to treat Africans and African Americans? Playing the race card is a losing proposition. So lets just stick with having the argument over the welfare state and collectivism versus classical liberalism and individualism.