http://www.libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/18/the-new-slave-masters/Police are the first class citizens now. The rest of us, we’re all the n-word.
Source date (UTC): 2011-11-18 13:48:00 UTC
http://www.libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/18/the-new-slave-masters/Police are the first class citizens now. The rest of us, we’re all the n-word.
Source date (UTC): 2011-11-18 13:48:00 UTC
The assertion that Europe’s crisis proves that the welfare state doesn’t work comes from many Republicans. … The idea, presumably, is that the crisis countries are in trouble because they’re groaning under the burden of high government spending. But .. the nations now in crisis don’t have bigger welfare states than the nations doing well — if anything, the correlation runs the other way. Sweden, with its famously high benefits, is a star performer… Meanwhile, before the crisis … spending on welfare-state programs … was lower, as a percentage of national income, in all of the nations now in trouble than in Germany… Oh, and Canada … has weathered the crisis better than we have.
( Sweden is a small homogenous protestant germanic country. It is an outlier. ) No one argues that highly redistributive societies are possible. We argue that large redistributive empires are impossible. This impossibility is caused by the fact that the social ‘economy’ that consists of opportunities, habits, manners, ethics and morals consists of a set of ‘costs’ that people must bear by ‘forgoing opportunity for privatization’. This forgone opportunity economy’s currency is status and this status economy rewards people for paying the fees of forgone opportunities. Money is the tool by which people pursue status by competing in the market. In any economy, racial and cultural (linguistic) diversity creates diverse sets of status signals cause economic competition that discourages redistribution. Therefore a redistributive economy can only persist in a homogenous society. And a rich, redistributive economy is only LIKELY to persist in a country where people are homogenous — culturally and racially. So, all external factors being equal, because of signaling, all empires are under constant pressure to fragment into tribes, and all tribes are under pressure to develop competitive institutions. Nationalism then is a prerequisite for wealth and redistribution. As Taleb states, the Levantines thought they were special too. Until there weren’t enough christians… Germanic protestants resent Northern germanic-italians resent souther greco-italians. And public intellectuals resent the status of both politicians and entrepreneurs and seek to alther the status economy for their benefit — just as Schumpeter said they would. 🙂
The 0.17%. The exact percentage of US Taxpayers that made more than $1M in 2009 income taxes. With 140M taxpayers, that’s 2.4M people who made $1M or more, and 66M people who didn’t pay any income taxes at all.
Source date (UTC): 2011-11-03 09:06:00 UTC
Vanessa Friedman of the Financial Times writes about her frustration that the ‘Best Dressed Lists’ actually contain the ‘most influential people’, not the best dressed. See Is Kate Middleton best-dressed or best-addressed?
So anyone want to join me in a campaign to change “Best Dressed List” to “Fashion’s Most Influential”? It would unquestionably bring some rationalism to the choices — though then again, rationalism has never exactly been high on the fashion hot list.
Of course. Fashion, cars and houses, as well as manners, posture, body language, and vocabulary are forms of signaling. Pretty is a commodity. Visit any campus. But alpha status is rare, and humans imitate alphas so that they can enhance their own status. The most popular posts I have ever written were on fashion. One declaring tattoos out of fashion in the middle class, the other declaring the northwest hiking ‘look’ out of fashion. I should write a fashion and relationship blog. I’d get far more readers. It would be trivially easy to write (because fashion is signaling – and signaling is economics). So why do I spend my time on Political Economy? I don’t know. Masochism. No other rational reason.
http://www.capitalismv3.com/index.php/2011/11/fashion-is-signaling-of-course-best-dressed-means-most-influential-not-most-beautiful/Is the Princess The Best Dressed? Of course. Because it’s not the clothes it’s the influence.
Source date (UTC): 2011-11-01 19:00:00 UTC
There is no increase in inequality. There is a change in the composition of households. Data is data is data. The change is caused by changes in who marries who, women in the workforce, devolution of the family, and immigration. It is what it is. So can we stop this ridiculous conversation now?
Source date (UTC): 2011-10-30 23:55:00 UTC
http://www.capitalismv3.com/index.php/2011/10/karl-smith-is-apple-evidence-against-austrians/The Zombie Philosophy Of The Progressive Left Economists
Source date (UTC): 2011-10-26 12:39:00 UTC
http://lewrockwell.com/rockwell/the-evil-1-percent194.htmlProtesting the wrong 1%
Source date (UTC): 2011-10-21 20:47:00 UTC
Krugman Watch: Austerity Class? Or is it a Starve-The-Beast Class? http://www.capitalismv3.com/index.php/2011/10/krugman-watch-austerity-class-or-is-it-a-starve-the-beast-class/
Source date (UTC): 2011-10-21 19:13:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/127462461812125696
http://www.capitalismv3.com/index.php/2011/10/krugman-watch-austerity-class-or-is-it-a-starve-the-beast-class/Krugman Watch: framing the debate by tactics not strategy as a means of undermining the argument.
Source date (UTC): 2011-10-21 15:12:00 UTC