Having an I love Slavic culture day today. In the states it’s pretty clear that Anglos, Dutch, and Nordics occupy the upper class, then germans, then Slavs. I would like to see data on it just to make sure it’s not geographic sampling in my part.
But here, they reach a natural distribution and it’s beautiful.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-14 04:17:00 UTC
ITS ARISTOCRACY THAT’S INDISPENSABLE, NOT AMERICA
–“America leads. We’re the indispensable nation.”– Obama
Let me correct not only Obama, but the entire deep state:
– Aristocracy leads because aristocrats are naturally superior at leading.
– Christian America is all that remains of world Aristocracy.
– Aristocracy is indispensable – not to nations, but to mankind.
Otherwise america is just an empire like any other.
Kill the state corporation.
Restore the monarchy and the nobility.
Restore exception-less, rule of law, and universal standing, under the only natural law that exists: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of hazard and externality of the same.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-10 06:42:00 UTC
THE IRS FINALLY BROKE MY LOVE OF COUNTRY
I just didn’t enjoy living in America any longer. I felt it was an anti-white-male culture. I felt punished for success. But it took one unjust prosecution, where the IRS owed me a lot of money, but they froze all my assets, and nearly ruined me. That act of class hatred by lowlife made me an enemy of the american government forever, and determined to end it forever.
Liberty in our lifetimes.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-06 03:46:00 UTC
Poverty demands our of necessity.
Plenty compromises out of utility.
Wealth avoids compromise and demand out of luxury.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-05 09:38:00 UTC
It’s like the 20th century has been a sustained effort to make life tolerable for low life.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-03 08:16:00 UTC
NOT A WHITE NATIONALIST. SORRY.
Culture-ist yes. Class-ist yes. Intelligence-ist, yes. Gender-ist, yes. Right of exclusion-ist, yes. Tribe-ist, nope. Racist Nope. Sorry. Not my thing. The meaningful differences between the races and tribes are differences in distributions not differences in properties. Aristocracy is for everyone. The more tribes the better. The more colorful the better. I read Darwin. I’m reasonably current on genetics. I’m all for restoring eugenic reproduction via one child policy for the dependent classes. And I’m all for charity for the dependent underclasses. But I’m into bettering every human family, not blaming other humans for acting like humans. So my preference is to criticize westerners for their suicidal group evolutionary strategy, not others for exercising theirs. But then again I am a rather scientific philosopher, and not a populist.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-30 12:57:00 UTC
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/when-america-was-great-taxes-were-high-unions-were-strong-and-government-was-big/407284/POSTWAR PRIVILEGE ENDED
1) Americans conquered a new continent
2) They sold off this continent to immigrants
3) They sold consumer goods to these immigrants.
4) They caused a collapse in prices in Europe (like china does to americans today)
5) They created new fiat money to give credit to these immigrants.
6) They directed these profits to investment in everything including the 20’s boom.
7) Europeans sought to control german expansion and created the european civil war.
8) The resulting correction and the oppressive settlement with Germany led to the second world war, which was merely an extension of the first, and which destroyed the word’s economy.
9) Americans inherited control of the British empire’s trading lanes and took over as the reserve currency.
10) American workers benefitted from producing expensive but low quality products to a world largely destroyed by war.
12) It took to the 1970’s for the world to reasonably rebuild.
13) In 1990 the effects of Chinese abandonment of communism and their entry into world labor started the dramatic shift in american consumption of consumer goods, just as america had done to Europe more than a century before.
15) In 2007 the rest of the world has largely adopted the same fiat money and consumer capitalist techniques.
16) In 2015, Americans have lost most competitive advantages EXCEPT for their GERMANIC high trust ethics and rule of law.
17) By 2040 Americans will lose their advantage in high trust ethics and rule of law to cultural and genetic conquest.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-29 22:54:00 UTC
[W]e have overwhelming data, in all walks of life, that shows that ‘beta’ women and ‘beta’ males fear standards (other’s behavior) that they cannot themselves adhere to, and that are existential reminders of the inferiority of their social standing. The technique that they use to vent their self loathing is gossip. Or what we call “rallying and shaming”. There are three purposes to Rallying and Shaming. (a) To alter the public perception of what is admirable, (b) to deprive the exceptional person of status signals (c) to decrease the relative distance between the ‘beta’ and the ‘alpha’. We see this technique used pervasively in economics and politics under ‘inequality’, in the gender wars as ‘paternalism’, in the race wars as ‘privilege’, and in the arts as subjectivism. But in all cases, it is the same behavior: the less desirable, able, and articulate, polluting excellence so that it is not copied by others, by rallying and shaming against those who are objectively their superiors. By shaming what is objectively superior, they hope to prevent being ‘left behind’ as inferiors, and to maintain their relative social standing – at least in their own minds, and among their peers. This strategy is known as ‘keeping each other down.”
[W]e have overwhelming data, in all walks of life, that shows that ‘beta’ women and ‘beta’ males fear standards (other’s behavior) that they cannot themselves adhere to, and that are existential reminders of the inferiority of their social standing. The technique that they use to vent their self loathing is gossip. Or what we call “rallying and shaming”. There are three purposes to Rallying and Shaming. (a) To alter the public perception of what is admirable, (b) to deprive the exceptional person of status signals (c) to decrease the relative distance between the ‘beta’ and the ‘alpha’. We see this technique used pervasively in economics and politics under ‘inequality’, in the gender wars as ‘paternalism’, in the race wars as ‘privilege’, and in the arts as subjectivism. But in all cases, it is the same behavior: the less desirable, able, and articulate, polluting excellence so that it is not copied by others, by rallying and shaming against those who are objectively their superiors. By shaming what is objectively superior, they hope to prevent being ‘left behind’ as inferiors, and to maintain their relative social standing – at least in their own minds, and among their peers. This strategy is known as ‘keeping each other down.”
Question for you. The Guardian put out a story the other day about “unaffordable Brittain” – although looking at the interactive map they published (shown below), they’re only really talking about England and Wales. Do you have a view on this? Will have a look for the parent article and post it below.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-16 06:53:00 UTC