Isn’t libertarianism merely an attempt by the middle class to obtain status and power parity with the judicial-military upper class, without paying the (dear) costs to the relationship to their customers and market that truth, judgment, policing, and warfare entail? Isn’t Jewish libertinism an attempt not only to escape those costs, but the costs of producing the commons AS WELL? Isn’t it necessary for commissions (dividends) from the market produced by the judicial-military imposition of order, just compensation for the high cost to their lives, livelihoods, relationships and families? Isn’t feminism and socialism just an attempt to circumvent the exchange of sex, care, and servitude for the results of the production of order, the production of goods and services, and the production of generations by the family? Aristocracy (martial/judicial – limits ) (organization of cooperation) Priestly (public intellectual – advocacy) (organization of ambitinos) Burgher (organization of production distribution and trade) Family (organization of production of generations) Labor (production of goods and services) (organization of physical reality) Dependent (Young, Infirmed, and Old) Underclass (those who cannot contribute but just cost) Criminal-class (career predators and parasites)
Theme: Class
-
The Class Divisions of Academic Labor
—“Stanford and Chicago GSB have more academic publications that these universities’ economics departments. Two things i don’t like in this trend. 1) Academia persuaded university authorities that to business PhD and MBA math-economics is indispensable. Applied programs people hate this “rigorous” nonsense 2) Too many graduates from mainstream go to teach in business schools.”— Arteom Korotchenya – Procedural Application (private business and public govt) vs – Application(repeatability) vs – Basic Research(discovery). Three different things. Very few basic research papers of merit in any given year. Many, many applications tested each year, each expanding or reducing empirical content and thereby increasing or decreasing candidacy in law. All organizations, intellectual included, operate by class structures, roughly segmented by every ten points of IQ +/- 1/2 St.Dev. And it is the cooperation between these classes that produces the difference between imagination, hypothesis, theory, and law. Those at the bottom test theories tested by application to data and hypothesized by basic research. Together we take a restructuring of human understanding, through various tests, until habituated by use, and assumed metaphysically as a natural property of existence. So think of the hierarchy as a production cycle, and work within your class, and don’t worry about what other classes do. They CAN only work with the conceptual tools that we give them. And very few of us struggle amidst ridiculous odds to find some innovation that can work its way through that production cycle and end up in our unconscious assumptions about the nature of reality and how we can act to benefit from it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev,
-
The Class Divisions of Academic Labor
—“Stanford and Chicago GSB have more academic publications that these universities’ economics departments. Two things i don’t like in this trend. 1) Academia persuaded university authorities that to business PhD and MBA math-economics is indispensable. Applied programs people hate this “rigorous” nonsense 2) Too many graduates from mainstream go to teach in business schools.”— Arteom Korotchenya – Procedural Application (private business and public govt) vs – Application(repeatability) vs – Basic Research(discovery). Three different things. Very few basic research papers of merit in any given year. Many, many applications tested each year, each expanding or reducing empirical content and thereby increasing or decreasing candidacy in law. All organizations, intellectual included, operate by class structures, roughly segmented by every ten points of IQ +/- 1/2 St.Dev. And it is the cooperation between these classes that produces the difference between imagination, hypothesis, theory, and law. Those at the bottom test theories tested by application to data and hypothesized by basic research. Together we take a restructuring of human understanding, through various tests, until habituated by use, and assumed metaphysically as a natural property of existence. So think of the hierarchy as a production cycle, and work within your class, and don’t worry about what other classes do. They CAN only work with the conceptual tools that we give them. And very few of us struggle amidst ridiculous odds to find some innovation that can work its way through that production cycle and end up in our unconscious assumptions about the nature of reality and how we can act to benefit from it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev,
-
Class Structure as Necessary Hierarchy in Limits. Militia (every able bodied man
Class Structure as Necessary Hierarchy in Limits.
Militia (every able bodied man sworn to defend sovereignty of all.
Aristocracy (martial/judicial – limits ) (organization of cooperation)
Priestly (public intellectual – advocacy) (organization of ambitions)
Burgher (organization of production distribution and trade)
Family (organization of production of generations)
Labor (production of goods and services) (organization of physical reality)
Dependent (Young, Infirmed, and Old)
Underclass (those who cannot contribute but just cost)
Criminal-class (career predators and parasites)
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 02:33:00 UTC
-
Liberty vs Sovereignty
LIBERTY VS SOVEREIGNTY Liberty evolved as ‘permission’. Sovereignty evolved as ‘ability’. Aristocracy seeks Sovereignty. The Bourgeoise seeks Liberty. The Craftsman seeks ‘Freedom‘. The Proletarian seeks Parasitism. (consumption) Thus Endeth The Lesson.
-
Liberty vs Sovereignty
LIBERTY VS SOVEREIGNTY Liberty evolved as ‘permission’. Sovereignty evolved as ‘ability’. Aristocracy seeks Sovereignty. The Bourgeoise seeks Liberty. The Craftsman seeks ‘Freedom‘. The Proletarian seeks Parasitism. (consumption) Thus Endeth The Lesson.
-
Reproductive Classes
REPRODUCTIVE CLASSES Elite – Extremely desirable Upper – Desirable throughout life. Middle – Desirable through fertility, Upper Lower – Desirable during peak fertility. Lower – Desirable only as ‘settling’ (last resort) Lowest – Undesirable
-
Reproductive Classes
REPRODUCTIVE CLASSES Elite – Extremely desirable Upper – Desirable throughout life. Middle – Desirable through fertility, Upper Lower – Desirable during peak fertility. Lower – Desirable only as ‘settling’ (last resort) Lowest – Undesirable
-
Why Don’t We MIX Economies?
Sep 05, 2016 12:48pm WHY IS IT THAT WE DON”T MIX ECONOMIES?
- Military (Slavery) – labor dependent
- Communist (Serfdom) – skill dependent
- Democratic Socialist (freedom) – mentally dependent
- Capitalist (liberty) – capital dependent
If nations are smaller there are more ‘top slots’ but each having less free capital for use in corruption available. All era’s face information problems when they scale. This is ours. The answer is always the same: information and institutions.
-
Why Don’t We MIX Economies?
Sep 05, 2016 12:48pm WHY IS IT THAT WE DON”T MIX ECONOMIES?
- Military (Slavery) – labor dependent
- Communist (Serfdom) – skill dependent
- Democratic Socialist (freedom) – mentally dependent
- Capitalist (liberty) – capital dependent
If nations are smaller there are more ‘top slots’ but each having less free capital for use in corruption available. All era’s face information problems when they scale. This is ours. The answer is always the same: information and institutions.