Theme: Class

  • “Some of the West’s people are tolerant of Cosmopolitan Jewish and Anglo Puritan

    —“Some of the West’s people are tolerant of Cosmopolitan Jewish and Anglo Puritan lies because we have members of the other classes who are still fearful of the aristocratic class.

    We must drive a wedge between them and the cosmopolitans and puritans. And it seems like this global employment and immigration crisis provides us with just that opportunity.

    The separate interests of the cosmopolitans and the lower classes of the host nation are becoming apparent – and with it, the lower classes are rebelling.

    The only group I see still tolerant of and allied to the Cosmopolitans is the academic class, most of whom are Underclass or Puritans because they academy has filtered out by intent and design the Aristocracy. But these ‘Secular Priests of Falsehood’ are still too afraid and confused about how they will survive, where they’ll go, what they’ll do once the people rebel against it.

    Showing them a plan during a transition would be helpful in getting them to decouple from the anti-commons crowd, too.”—Josh Jeppson


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 10:54:00 UTC

  • “There is so much misunderstanding involved in libertarian equality-bashing. Equ

    —“There is so much misunderstanding involved in libertarian equality-bashing. Equality was not conceived as a leveling process, but as an empowerment project — to let as many people as possible realize their potential. Equality as leveling is harshly criticized by the best minds of Social Democratic theory, such as Roberto Unger.”—Asgeir Theodor Johannesson

    —“Very percipient Mr. Johannesson.

    And what a great difference there was between this noble conception and its fruition.

    To bifurcate the two is useful. That of

    – empowerment of all to fulfill a specialist working within the community (a craft), and

    that of

    – dragging almost everyone down to a rung below the initial average in the name of ‘equality of outcome’, or even more perniciously (seemingly surprising to the unlettered) ‘equality of opportunity’.”—Andy Curzon

    THE PROBLEM OF LIBERTARIANISM’S INCOMPLETE SENTENCES AND MARXIST SUBSITUTION

    Equality is an incomplete sentence open to suggestion, which is why it is yet another example of the fraud of suggestion.

    Equality of adjudication of differences in disputes over property in toto? Well, that’s just natural law by which we eliminate all frictions in the hope of developing the highest velocity, and therefore lowest costs, for all.

    When someone says equality, ask them equality of what?

    Cheers

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 10:50:00 UTC

  • OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OU

    OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OUR FAULT FOR BEING OUT-GUNNED BY IT. ESPECIALLY BY THEIR ALLIANCE WITH OUR WOMEN AND PURITANS.

    There is blame for everyone in the enlightenment – perhaps the jews and French the most. As I say, don’t blame the innovator in warfare, blame those who are losign from not developing superior countermeasures because of underinvestment in weaponry.

    —“Ezra Pound had many clever ideas, but his faulting “Big Jew” was not one of them.”— Boris Miroslav Spacek

    He was correct that the cosmopolitans were the originators of the second ‘religious’ conquest of the west, this time by pseudoscience rather than by authoritarian mysticism.

    We have Aesop, Homer, Alexander, Aristotle, Aurelius, Machiavelli, Bacon, Locke, Smith, Hume, Jefferson, Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Menger, Nietzche, Hayek, and all those in between.

    But the cosmopolitans reacted to them with the Pseudoscientific Counter-Enlightenment: Boaz (anthropology), Freud (psychology), Marx (economics and sociology), Cantor(mathematical platonism), Mises (economic pseudoscience), Adorno/Frankfurt( anti-aristocratic aesthetics), Rand and Rothbard (anti-commons).

    And sold the pseudoscience to the female and underclass populace as a utopian scheme via the academy for profit, just as the mysticism was sold to the female and underclass via traveling preachers for profit: to rebel against the aristocracy that domesticated them out of ignorance, mysticism, tribalism, and poverty.

    So this is all merely a fact of history now, and the consequences of the first great lie: authoritarian mysticism, and the second great lie of critical pseudoscience are empirically observable as the destruction of common capital in all its forms.

    So no, he was not wrong.

    What he was wrong about, and what all subsequent generations have been wrong about, is that when one is confronted by an act of warfare wether by arms, by immigration(displacement), by economics, by conversion, or by information (falsehood), that one can be out-gunned-out-germed-out-steeled by immigration, economics, conversion, or informational propaganda as well as by force of arms.

    So that the failure to adapt to a new form of warfare is OUR FAULT, rather than the fault of the innovators of the new form of warfare.

    And this is not complicated.

    We have built western civilization into the FASTEST evolving civilization by the domestication of humans under our domain, through nothing more than the use of the common, natural, judge-discovered law, and the use of truth, empiricism, reason, arms and technology despite small numbers to do so. And we have dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of mysticism, ignorance, poverty, and starvation, and disease with those tools – and we profited from it. And there is no shame in that profiting.

    Compare the consequences of the use of western truth to domesticate man, and the consequences of the first reaction to aristocracy (scriptural religion), the second reaction to Aristotelian aristocracy (scriptural monotheism), and the third reaction to Baconian empiricism (pseudoscientific cosmopolitanism).

    Are jews responsible for the second and third great lies and the harm that they have done? Of course they are.

    Are we responsible for not yet advancing our law so that such lies are impossible to propagate through as aggressive punishment of that method of war and crime as every other method of war and crime?

    Yes, we are.

    So the jews are certainly to blame for much of the world’s reliance on the great lies, and the conflicts therefrom. But we are responsible for tolerating the great lies.

    The interesting question is… why are we tolerant of the great lies, either supernatural great lies, or pseudoscientific great lies?

    And why is it that the jews have learned to specialize in ‘the big lies’ as the Russians and Germans have so frequently observed?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 09:26:00 UTC

  • “Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and

    —“Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and emotional blackmail first,and the barrel of a gun later. In the closed nationstate model of the 20th century it was used to shift blocks of capital to different competing institutions. In a global neoliberal anarchic sense it’s used to loot dying nation states and transfer wealth to global oligarchic power confederacies. We must (temporarily?) embrace nationalism not necessarily along moral lines (nationalism has become a form of nostalgic romanticism that is fun obviously) but as “firewalls” against nomadic oligarchs looting and robbing and destroying our crumbling cultural and and bureaucratic institutions.”— Murray Sell


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:21:00 UTC

  • I would like to teach the philosophy of aristocracy. Because, except for a few n

    I would like to teach the philosophy of aristocracy. Because, except for a few notable exceptions like nietzche, the entire corpus is the philosophy of beggars.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 21:05:00 UTC

  • Ridicule: the last refuge of those without an argument. The genteel classes were

    Ridicule: the last refuge of those without an argument. The genteel classes were better served by duel.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 17:22:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794952987491844096

    Reply addressees: @LilDocCollins @Bgiant1Bob @nsa @CIA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794945099566235648


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794945099566235648

  • ” The Left didn’t just sell the Working Class down the river – they convinced ma

    —” The Left didn’t just sell the Working Class down the river – they convinced many of them to support policies against their own self-interest, trading security, liberty, and prosperity for virtue-signalling.”—Ryan Montague


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 16:12:00 UTC

  • I LOVE MY WORKING CLASS PEEPS. F-k these leftists who sold them down the river

    I LOVE MY WORKING CLASS PEEPS.

    F-k these leftists who sold them down the river.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 13:52:00 UTC

  • CLASS HIERARCHY IN WESTERN POLYTHEISM 1 – WARFARE – limitation on external chang

    CLASS HIERARCHY IN WESTERN POLYTHEISM

    1 – WARFARE – limitation on external change to the status quo (highly intolerant of error) an authoritarian organization of mandatory allies against other organizations of allies.

    2 – NATURAL COMMON LAW – limitation on internal change in the status quo (social science) (intolerant of error) and taking advantage of institutional allies.

    3 – PHYSICAL SCIENCE – Upper Middle-class investigation of truth for use in changing the status quo (pragmatic with error) and authoritative accumulation of allies.

    4 – ECONOMIC SCIENCE – Middle class (partly) pseudoscience, (partly) science, and (partly) philosophy for use in changing the status quo – arguably for the worse.

    5 – PHILOSOPHY – Middle-Class Appeal for change or affirmation of the status quo. (largely error, signaling, and deceit – persuasive accumulation of allies)

    6 – LITERATURE – Clerical Class visions of alternatives to the status quo (conciliatory romantic appeal to allies)

    7 – PSEUDOSCIENCE-PSEUDORATIONALISM – working class rebellion against the status quo – seeking other similar allies.

    8 – RELIGION – underclass escape from the material status quo by alliance with those below it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 08:31:00 UTC

  • It’s not how many people read the Wall St Journal. It’s WHO reads it. The term “

    It’s not how many people read the Wall St Journal. It’s WHO reads it. The term “Everybody”: “Everyone of consequence”. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 22:39:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794308056482009089

    Reply addressees: @NorthBayTeky

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794250317474861056


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NorthBayTeky

    Not “everyone” https://t.co/wp5nisYBsG

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794250317474861056