joel… I think it’s that libertarians (eastern european underclass libertines) evolved as a response to the funding of competitors. And unable to determine how to solve that problem, they deny commons entirely. Moreover, if one can exist parasitically upon the commons generated by others, it’s cheaper and easier to acumulate wealth.
Commons are damned expensive.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 09:18:00 UTC
The cost of the underclass.
https://www.facebook.com/7NewsBrisbane/videos/1420432344636280/
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 05:20:00 UTC
WASHINGTON STATE VIRTUE SIGNALING
(a) washington until now has never experienced the problems of underclass immigratino, in no small part becuase i) like oregon, no black immigration, and ii) no labor immigration, only technical immigration.
(b) virtue signaling because of accident is a form of deceit – a lie. Washington remained a paradise precisely because it never had to encounter the problems until now. I was just in Redmond. MIcrosoft will not persist. That’s just in the numbers. When it fails, Redmond will look like ROChESTER NY after the fall of Xerox/Kodak. And left leaning seattleites will get their dream: AN INCREASE IN THE DEMAND FOR AUTHORITARIANISM BECAUSE OF A DECREASE IN HOMOGENEITY OF CULTURE, ABILITY, AND INTERESTS.
This is what separates the west from the east: eliminate the demand for authority, or increase the demand for authority. Europeans discovered government without rule. But since the socialist era, the underclass has been sold a present pseudoscientific religion of perpetual consumption, just as the ancient world’s underclass was sold a future supernatural religion of perpetual consumption in the afterlife.
Lies for fun and profit. Burn the roman empire to the ground through immigration and invasion, and conversion via lies. Burn the Anglo-German empire to the ground through immigration, invasion, and conversion via lies.
We can take the european route of profiting from rule that reduces the underclass and the demand for authority, or take the middle eastern route of profiting from rule that increases the underclass by increasing the demand for authority.
Our european method produces egalitarian peers consisting of genetically middle class majority, and the middle eastern method produces majority underclass of competing tribes the rule of which requires authority.
So choose an america of Castes that looks like India today, and Brazil in the making – or choose a europe made of many small homogenous middle class polities, consisting of equalitarian peers.
There is no method by which we can make the underclass otherwise. It is the scale of the underclass the determines the possible methods of rule.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 15:37:00 UTC
—“Marxists: it’s not the distribution of production, it’s the DISTRIBUTION of IQ”—Kashif Vikaas
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 20:45:00 UTC
(I don’t think of it as marxist terms by the way. The west has always practiced the model of aristocracy, nobility, burgher, freeman, serf, slave, and ‘other’. All that changes is the distribution of power between aristocracy(military), nobility (managerial), and clergy (administrative). What’s ‘Novel’ is the expansion of the ‘burgher’ s (merchants) and the transfer of the clerical class and revenues from the clergy to what we consider the middle class. )
—“Results from these three research methods suggests that in the United States today approximately 15 to 20 percent are in the poor, lower class; 30 to 40 percent are in the working class; 40 to 50 percent are in the middle class; and 1 to 3 percent are in the rich, upper class.”—-
I use Paul Fussel’s book “Class” as the best overall analysis to date.
Prior to the enlightenment, 50% of europe’s lands were in the hands of the church and rented out for profit. The monasteries produced goods and functioned as the ‘big corporations do today’, The clergy, because it maintained a near monopoly on literacy, fulfilled much of the clerical labor force – at least as far as government went.
With the enlightenment and the printing press (a) the clergy no longer had a monopoly (similar to today’s academy/state/media complex is losing it’s monopoly on the control of information, and (b) the revolutions deprived the church of its means of income, and (c) private industry could concentrate capital and invest and the church could not.
When Darwin dealt a death blow to the only income stream related to the church (a channel to the divine), the academy ‘left the parent’s home’ so to speak and took over teaching the ‘new religion of sciences’ so to speak.
Unfortunately, the truth was only appealing to the upper classes. So once the academy found the lies of the cosmopolitans to serve as a product for the ascendent middle, working, and lower classes, they stepped in and replaced the church as the propagandists and ‘priests’ of the new state.
What has happened, primarily since (a) the failure of the great society program, and (b) the fall of world communism, the expansive corruptoin of all socialist polities, and (c) the incremental erasure of the (((cosmopolitan pseudosciences))) strangely enough, in no small part by (((a group of intellectuals))) who are nearly forced to admit that given the record of democratic voting, the economic and political record, the results of cognitive, genetic, and archeological science, that the conservatives (aristocracy) was right all along.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 17:34:00 UTC
(When I use the term “88’er” I’m referring exclusively to the people who try to justify the hitler cult who lack intelligence to do so, and rapidly resort to insults and spamming when their sophism runs into the brick wall of reason, logic, science, and the institutions necessary to produce and maintain a polity its economy, and its commons.)
Basically I’m ok with anything as long as it’s not false or impossible. And for a polity, it’s economy, and its commons, the chickens come home to roost eventually. The less more correspondent your rules of decidability, the more survivable and durable your polity, economy, and commons. The less correspondent your rules of decidability the less survivable and durable your polity, economy, and commons.
NSDAP was a non-correspondent momentum play – an attempt to create a religion (cult) to use remaining property-in-toto, to create an empire that would provide survivability where the status quo would not. That I agree that this aesthetic was beautiful, and the strategy was a brilliant use of new media, propaganda, and irreproducible time-and-place, is very different from saying it was either survivable or repeatable. The Nazis innovated using new technology to take advantage of time and place. If you want to create a new aesthetic in this time and place, you need to innovate in aesthetic, use new technology, that will produce similar ends in this time and place.
IMHO this is not possible because NS was a working class movement that competed against the communist working class movement. And frankly we no longer possess such a working class, nor one that can be motivated by such means, in this time and place. The era where we could rally the peasantry, rally the working class has been gone, and we are left with the opposite vulnerability – others are rallying the under-and-immigrant-classes (the opposition) using the strategy the NS made use of.
Right now we have a full spectrum of the New Right emerging with a language for every class. And as is usual in the west, instead of speaking with one class voice (the working class under NS, the peasantry under christianity), we are speaking with all voices of all our classes.
Yet, each class makes the mistake that their language is sufficient for the motivation of other classes. They live in their own cognitively biased world. And so we may in fact need various languages of inspiration and motivation for each of the classes – I certainly don’t intend to inspire the working class, only to fight for his interests in my own classes.
So rallying around a singe ideology is very difficult. And it will be difficult until we have a solution and a plan of achieving it. But when we have a solution and a plan of achieving it, each class can modify it’s message to support the plan or some variation of it.
This is what is preventing the right from coalescing into a single movement. It’s why the current administration bought us time, but may not have been as helpful as being backed against the wall as the left now feels.
I am certain my solution of modifying the constitution will produce the ends we desire over a fairly short if not rapid period of time. And it will work – not because it will produce a shared belief – but because it will prevent the formation of competing solutions, and it will use the same selfish market incentives in the prosecution of anti-westerners as we westerners have used to create our other ‘markets in everything’.
Just as simpletons talk about people, average people talk about events, above average people talk about ideas – in revolutionary context, simpletons talk about beliefs (if we all believe or value x), average people talk about education or policy (if we can only get x done), above average people talk about institutions and incentives (if we only do x the rest will follow).
There may exist some other possible means. But as far as I can tell, we have lost our numbers due to the intentional invasion of the west by the underclasses for the purpose of creating demand for authority, for the purpose of ending western aristocratic civilization, and the great experiment of the anglo saxon peoples in contractualism, sovereignty, and rule of internally consistent externally correspondent reciprocally moral, Natural Law. The only system of self governance that makes possible Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 08:33:00 UTC
Every time the whacko 88’ers attack me all they do is legitimize me with the mainstream – proving my point. Nationalism for everyone sells. shit talking other people while claiming your superior does nothing.
(yes I’ve been drinking. lol)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 20:34:00 UTC
—-“National Socialism (working class) and Libertarianism (middle, producing class) are class-specific evolutionary strategies stated in rational-universalist terms.”—- James Augustus Berens
(james being genius again)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 20:24:00 UTC
WE ARE ARISTOCRACY NOT ELITES
“We do not seek to separate ourselves from the soldiers, the workmen, the craftsmen, the modern guild-masters, and the white-collar-toilers of experiment, calculation and planning. Instead, we SERVE THEM in their war of survival against the globalist merchants of empty-words that constitute the membership of the Cathedral Complex: the marketers, advertisers, media, the public intellectuals, the state, and the academy that trains them in the art of empty words.”
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-10 13:59:00 UTC
THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CIVIC WITH THE COFFEE TABLE
Jane Pauley (upper middle class) (mid-atlantic) ( civic courtroom )
Katie Couric (middle class) (NY jew) (the stage)
Kathy Lee Gifford (lower middle class) (midland) ( living room )
Kelly Rippa (upper working class) (midland) (family room)
Oprah (lower middle class whites)(grandma’s parlor)
The View (undesirables,upper proletarians) ( Italian restaurant )
The devolution of the rhetorical commons
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-08 10:57:00 UTC