Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • The Functions of the Classes

    THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES (propertarian class theory) ——UPPER——- TOOL OF COERCION: FORCE – MILITARY, LAW, SHERIFF
    1) UPPER – PRODUCTION OF ORDER (SOVEREIGNTY) Rule Economyt (Aristocracy Profit from the Organization of Labor+K) ——MIDDLE——- TOOL OF COERCION – REMUNERATION – ORGANIZATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRADE 2) UPPER MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION (LIBERTY) Capitalism ( Organization of Labor+Knowledge ) 3) MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF TRANSFORMATION (FREEDOM) Market Economy ( Voluntarily Organized Labor+K) 4) LOWER MIDDLE (working) TRANSFORMATION (PARTICIPATION) Mixed Economy ( Voluntary + Involuntarily Organized Labor+K) ——LOWER——- TOOL OF COERCION: GOSSIP (RESISTANCE) – PRODUCTION, DIST. AND TRADE 5) LOWER (working) LABOR (PARTICIPATION) Command Economy ( Lower – Involuntarily Organized Labor+K) 6) DEPENDENT – PRODUCTION OF GENERATIONS (POS. FREEDOM) Dependent Economy (Dependents – Redistributions from Labor+K) #NewRight

  • Using Horizontal and Vertical Classes

    —“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”— Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes. And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes. But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes. And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health. So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other. Curt Doolittle

  • Using Horizontal and Vertical Classes

    —“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”— Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes. And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes. But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes. And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health. So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other. Curt Doolittle

  • SERIES: Means of Rule

    THE ACCUMULATION AND CONSUMPTION OF CAPITAL CREATED THROUGH INCREASING AND DECREASING ORGANIZATION AUTHORITARIAN RULE (WAR – EVOLUTION ) Fascism (Authoritarianism) is the means by which we use the violence of the state to organize the entire society to solve a small, urgent, problem, of war, economic war, religious war, demographic war, or rapid economic transformation. MINORITY RULE ( EVOLUTION ) Oligarchy is the means by which we use the violence of the state to domesticate the unruly for profit, until they are no longer sufficiently unruly that they can obtain rule of law. RULE OF LAW (RECIPROCITY-PEAK) Rule of law is the means by which we use the promise of violence of the state to force trades between the classes so that everyone achieves the best available without violating reciprocity (cooperation). MAJORITY RULE (DEVOLUTION) Majority Rule (Democracy, Republican Democracy) is the means by which the majority of women and the underclass can use the violence of the state to extract rents from the productive classes who would otherwise invest them in long term monumental, institutional, genetic, and normative returns.      

  • Why? Because I won’t betray my ancestors, their kin, my kin, and the middle and

    Why? Because I won’t betray my ancestors, their kin, my kin, and the middle and working classes, even my underclasses. That’s why.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-17 13:38:00 UTC

  • SERIES: MEANS OF RULE: DEFINITIONS MAJORITY RULE (DEVOLUTION) Majority Rule (Dem

    SERIES: MEANS OF RULE: DEFINITIONS

    MAJORITY RULE (DEVOLUTION)

    Majority Rule (Democracy, Republican Democracy) is the means by which the majority of women and the underclass can use the violence of the state to extract rents from the productive classes who would otherwise invest them in long term monumental, institutional, genetic, and normative returns.

    RULE OF LAW (RECIPROCITY-PEAK)

    Rule of law is the means by which we use the promise of violence of the state to force trades between the classes so that everyone achieves the best available without violating reciprocity (cooperation).

    MINORITY RULE ( EVOLUTION )

    Oligarchy is the means by which we use the violence of the state to domesticate the unruly for profit, until they are no longer sufficiently unruly that they can obtain rule of law.

    AUTHORITARIAN RULE (WAR – EVOLUTION )

    Fascism (Authoritarianism) is the means by which we use the violence of the state to organize the entire society to solve a small, urgent, problem, of war, economic war, religious war, demographic war, or rapid economic transformation.

    THE ACCUMULATION AND CONSUMPTION OF CAPITAL CREATED THROUGH INCREASING AND DECREASING ORGANIZATION

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-17 09:12:00 UTC

  • “Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and

    —“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”—

    Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes.

    And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes.

    But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes.

    And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health.

    So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-13 22:04:00 UTC

  • THE LANGUAGES AND CLASSES OF ECONOMICS (h/t Jacob Liam Youngman ) In the intelle

    THE LANGUAGES AND CLASSES OF ECONOMICS

    (h/t Jacob Liam Youngman )

    In the intellectual division of labor there are those of use who use the discipline of economics as extension of natural law, those for utilitarian purposes, and those for exploitative purposes.

    So you will find a host of people like Thiel, Me, and Emil Suric, for whom economics is one of the sciences we rely upon in the pursuit of the evolutionary good – in the absence of dishonesty and conflict. Which is a very low (long) time preference, put to very moral (cooperative) ends. And you will find people like krugman and delong who rely upon economics for high (short) time preference, put to immoral (dysgenic) ends, using it as a means of conflict, and embracing the dishonesty that is possible by the use of quantitative aggregates and cherry picking of measurements.

    Within these groups: the Natural Law (Social Science) group that thinks in the long term, the pragmatist group that seeks to use economics within Rule of Law (non-discretionary rule based action) in the medium term, and the short term “we’ll fix it later” Discretionary Rule group – arguments are relatively consistent.

    The only difficulty for the common person is that without a ‘label’ that identifies the short dysgenic, medium pragmatic and meritocratic, and the long term meritocratic and eugenic, it’s hard to know which team an economist is playing for.

    But again, within each team, it is very, very, obvious what team each of us is playing for.

    But since economics has displaced morality as the method of decidability in politics; and because economics has evolved largely as a pseudoscience due to the short-term incentives of the discretionary rulership; and because we live under majority (monopoly) rule, its not possible for us to conduct trades between the short medium and long term ‘classes’.

    Realistically the left short female dysgenic underclass and the pseudoscientific priesthoood that rules on their behalf by parasitic transfer of wealth; the aspirational, pragmatic, male meritocratic commercial, financial, and entrepreneurial sector that tries to create wealth, and the conservative, defensive, masculine meritocratic judicial martial and familial sector that tries to preserve wealth that has been accumulated.

    So we have a martial and entrepreneurial middle and working class that remain the only moral people remaining. And we have the state, academy, media complex that conspires against the martial and entrepreneurial.

    So People like “US” all sound the same. What we lacked was the language to argue honestly, rationally, and empirically against the dysgenic parasitic financialization of rule that uses pseudoscience and propaganda and the state to circumvent natural law and rule of law.

    My hope is that as our circle expands from a few dozen to a few hundred that we will produce and distribute that language and through its frequent use, empower the martial, entrepreneurial, working and middle classes to overthrow their dysgenic oppressors.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 09:16:00 UTC

  • “Are you specifically maintaining there would be no libertarianism without marx,

    —“Are you specifically maintaining there would be no libertarianism without marx, or merely that most contemporary libertarian rhetoric derives from the marxist tradition? For example, libertarian class theory preceded marx, and marx explicitly borrowed from it.”— Skye Stewart

    (a) there is no ‘libertarian’ theory that I know of prior to the 20th century, even though there were libertine and anarchist theories. (b) western liberty movements sought to preserve contractualism, but never decried commons – classical liberalism was a movement to do MORE with the commons, rather than privatize it by the nobility. To gain peerage with the nobility. An aristocracy of everyone.

    The western liberty movement peaks under jefferson’s natural law contractualism. And the rent seeking began all over again.

    But Marx restated jewish history “of the unwanted” as a universal, and cast the aristocracy as oppressors rather than domesticators and defenders – a tradition continued by the Frankfurt school. He created a class theory of oppression rather than domestication. He sought a revolution against the aristocracy, and an inversion of the aristocratic order. And he sought to do it by depriving the aristocracy of property as its means of domestication.

    Rothbard only changed the strategy; deprive the aristocracy of commons and retain your private property, and you will destroy the principle asset of western man: his unique ability to construct commons.

    Do I think marx and rothbard, as well as freud, mises, and boaz (jews), have any more of an idea what they’re doing than women do when they undermine our civilization? Do gypsies? Do Muslims? I don’t think these people operate by reason but by intuition, and they all intuit that the west is something to be preyed upon – and do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-05 10:09:00 UTC

  • “Success expands acquisitions, which increases the phenomena to track, which all

    “Success expands acquisitions, which increases the phenomena to track, which allows for un-meritocratic creep into social and governmental institutions.”

    “The aristocracy gradually gets infected by the petty bourgeoisie who desire the material comforts and status gained, but who reject the virtue trials that grant warrior-aristocrats their moral indisputability.”

    “As the social and governmental institutions come to be stocked with mere bureaucrats, demands of virtue and competence decline. It becomes a downward spiral of the weak and incompetent struggling to cheaply profit how their petty vision and ability allow them.”

    “The republican ideal necessitates selling two products: liberty and security, the former for the virtuous and hungry who want enfranchisement and are willing to accept the rigors and the latter for the plebs who will otherwise ally with a Caesarian-Machiavellian figure against the aristocracy if they aren’t granted their petty needs (and with their subsequent constraints of influence).”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-04 11:04:00 UTC