Akhenaten was trying to do the same thing I am, 3350 years ago. End the rent seeking parasites.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:48:00 UTC
Akhenaten was trying to do the same thing I am, 3350 years ago. End the rent seeking parasites.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:48:00 UTC
WE have a huge population of smart indians in america. But that’s because of who immigrated in the tech community. But in proportion to their ‘reserves’ of IQ, it doesn’t ‘make a dent in their home population.
Take Ireland during the famine and lose everyone capable of exiting.
Take america and add 100M africans, caribbeans, and amerindians.
It’s not like we don’t have dumb as a rock white people. We do. The problem is that the chinese and whites killed off more of our stupid than anyone else did.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:41:00 UTC
WHAT IQ AVERAGES DON”T TELL YOU
IQ averages really tell you the various sizes of the under, labor, and working class, and lower middle, middle and upper middle class.
You really can’t say ‘x people are stupid’. You have to only say: damn, in that population, there are wayyy more stupid people than smart people.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:33:00 UTC
THE NEW RIGHT. ALL OF US. ALL MEN. YES ITS AWESOME.
—“It sounds like you are saying that good men of all the classes (working, labor, middle, upper, academic, etc.), in the current disorder, each with their own language, with their own skills and contributions, can come together consciously in the struggle to correct the wrong of egalitarianism, leftism, progressivism (etc.). That would be awesome.”—Todd Ojala
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 14:11:00 UTC
THE ALT RIGHT (OR NEW RIGHT) BY CAUSE RATHER THAN LANGUAGE
The alt right (or new right) has given up hope of reconciliation and returned to separatism.
The Hopeful Right of the 18th, 19th, and 20th, centuries have been proven wrong by the evidence. And we have transitions to the Unhopeful Right. And finally, the Resigned Right.
Why? Because it is not possible to create the enlightenment fantasy of Aristocracy of Everyone.
Man was not oppressed by the aristocracy. Man was domesticated from beast, to slave, to serf, to freeman, to citizen, and if possible he might, if he possessed sufficient agency, earn his sovereignty among other sovereign men.
But since man was not oppressed, and man was merely domesticated – like every other plant and animal – many men (and many more women) are not domesticated sufficiently, so that they lack the agency, to join the aristocracy, of sovereign men.
The problem the anglo middle class man created, was his siezure of the power of the state from the aristocracy under the pretense of oppression rather than the evidence of domestication.
Through colonialism and then marxist-postmodernism, this error has spread round the world.
And faced with the evidence, the aristocracy of everyone – the ‘egalitarianism’ – has failed, and the right is abandoning it, and deflating christianity, and returning to the ethics of aristocracy.
So the redaction of christian universalist ethics of the enlightenment has occurred across all classes, and we are seeing the reactions of different classes from the Nat-Soc labor class, to the alt-right working class, to the nationalist middle class, to the civilizational upper middle class, to the academic class (people like Me, Duchesne, MacDonald, and even to a lesser degree Peterson) all demonstrating our class-communication methods but all of us saying precisely the same thing.
That the christian universalist era is over, and the myth of the aristocracy of everyone is over. And the myth of the oppressed is over.
It’s just aristocracy of those of us with agency, and the rest of the barbarian animals that have yet to be domesticated.
We must only choose whether to fence off the animals, or pay the high cost of domesticating them against their will
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 13:50:00 UTC
CLASSES AND THEIR OVERLAP
We can divide people into categories (classes) by reproductive desirability ( neoteny, health, symmetry, ratios, height ), social norms (degree of suppression of impulse), occupational achievement, income achievement, and intelligence. And perhaps a hundred other classifications. However, they all overlap to the point where in the aggregate they’re synonymous.
So yeah. There is such a thing as underclasses, laboring classes, working classes, managerial classes, administrative classes, calculative classes, academic classes, entrepreneurial classes, financial classes, legal classes, political classes.
These categories demonstrably exist and demonstrably sort people by ability, where ability is the desirability of their personas, their physical appearance, their accumulated learning, and the rate of their learning, and their utility to one another because of those things.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 12:13:00 UTC
MALTHUS WAS HALF WRONG
(worth repeating)
The bottom is too heavy. Malthus was wrong. It is not that the numbers will defeat us. It is that the numbers of those lacking agency will defeat us because the cost of their transformation from animal to man is simply too high for the productivity available to them to be used to organize them into a voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade, in the absence of technology and markets produced externally to them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 08:44:00 UTC
“alt right: the aristocratic civilization’s martial classes have given up hope that the other classes can join the aristocracy of everyone. And so we must restore our rights, or separate, or both.”
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 23:51:00 UTC
The academy is happy to talk to the upper middle class, but who is actually working for the middle, working, and upper laboring classes: the moral people?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-13 19:49:00 UTC
STOP THINKING MONOPOLY (MAJORITY) DEMOCRACY
That era of power is gone.
The Right, using the Marxist Strategy, is dividing into different forms of argument for each social class. This is the correct strategy, rather than another ‘christian monopoly’.
So the underclass (nazis), working class (ridicule), the middle class ( ‘we’ve tolerated enough’), upper middle class ( education ), and intellectual class (academics) are using different arguments to make the same point:
We are no not tolerating this status quo any longer, and we are certainly not letting it go further.
So ‘don’t punch right’ unless they punch you is actually the right strategy.
Leave them alone.
I stomp on the nazi drivel as signaling, I delete memes as signaling, and I step on libertarian virtue signaling (Free riders) (like some of the ‘contemporary limitless christian ethicists’ in this thread), and I especially stomp on people who use religion to argue, or to propose a solution.
I want arguments and solutions – because that’s my ‘class’ approach.
But understand, there is only one solution. VIOLENCE. (Revolution).
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-12 17:37:00 UTC